GLXY vs. NBIS
GLXY (Galaxy Digital Inc.) and NBIS (Nebius Group N.V.) are both stocks. GLXY operates in Capital Markets (Financial Services), while NBIS operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services). Over the past year, GLXY returned -18.60% vs 308.81% for NBIS. Their 0.47 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
GLXY vs. NBIS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLXY achieves a -2.15% return, which is significantly lower than NBIS's 153.96% return.
GLXY
- 1D
- 4.14%
- 1M
- -11.02%
- 6M
- -17.25%
- YTD
- -2.15%
- 1Y
- -18.60%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -5.71%
NBIS
- 1D
- 11.64%
- 1M
- -1.41%
- 6M
- 141.13%
- YTD
- 153.96%
- 1Y
- 308.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 285.91%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $132.32M | $137.55M | $181.75M | |
| $5.03B | $4.20B | $4.28B |
GLXY vs. NBIS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GLXY Galaxy Digital Inc. | -2.15% | -4.85% |
NBIS Nebius Group N.V. | 153.96% | 133.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLXY and NBIS is 0.50, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2025 | 0.48 |
The correlation between GLXY and NBIS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
GLXY:
$7.26B
NBIS:
$51.02B
GLXY:
$0.16
NBIS:
$3.08
GLXY:
135.90
NBIS:
68.94
GLXY:
4.15
NBIS:
23.69
GLXY:
0.78
NBIS:
65.69
GLXY:
$57.33B
NBIS:
$877.90M
GLXY:
$46.78B
NBIS:
$420.60M
GLXY:
$577.49M
NBIS:
-$52.78M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLXY vs. NBIS — Risk / Return Rank
GLXY
NBIS
GLXY vs. NBIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Galaxy Digital Inc. (GLXY) and Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GLXY | NBIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.37 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.31 | 6.44 | -6.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.52 | 14.21 | -14.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GLXY vs. NBIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLXY drawdown since its inception was -60.71%, roughly equal to the maximum NBIS drawdown of -58.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLXY and NBIS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLXY | NBIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.71% | -58.27% | -2.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -60.71% | -48.30% | -12.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.95% | -25.85% | -23.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.25% | -19.20% | -10.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 35.87% | 21.85% | +14.02% |
Volatility
GLXY vs. NBIS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Galaxy Digital Inc. (GLXY) is 30.86%, while Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) has a volatility of 46.63%. This indicates that GLXY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NBIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLXY | NBIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 30.86% | 46.63% | -15.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 70.53% | 83.37% | -12.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 91.33% | 114.07% | -22.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 90.24% | 113.43% | -23.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 90.24% | 113.43% | -23.19% |
Dividends
GLXY vs. NBIS - Dividend Comparison
Neither GLXY nor NBIS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
GLXY vs. NBIS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Galaxy Digital Inc. and Nebius Group N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
GLXY and NBIS have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NBIS has higher volatility (46.63%) compared to GLXY (30.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLXY dropped -60.71% vs NBIS's -58.27%.
NBIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GLXY and NBIS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer