PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LQDT vs. GOLDX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between LQDT and GOLDX is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.1

Performance

LQDT vs. GOLDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT) and Gabelli Gold Fund (GOLDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
66.00%
9.17%
LQDT
GOLDX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LQDT:

2.48

GOLDX:

1.51

Sortino Ratio

LQDT:

3.98

GOLDX:

2.06

Omega Ratio

LQDT:

1.55

GOLDX:

1.26

Calmar Ratio

LQDT:

1.42

GOLDX:

0.66

Martin Ratio

LQDT:

24.05

GOLDX:

5.29

Ulcer Index

LQDT:

4.52%

GOLDX:

7.56%

Daily Std Dev

LQDT:

44.06%

GOLDX:

26.53%

Max Drawdown

LQDT:

-95.31%

GOLDX:

-79.86%

Current Drawdown

LQDT:

-44.12%

GOLDX:

-40.36%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LQDT achieves a 12.95% return, which is significantly higher than GOLDX's 9.47% return. Over the past 10 years, LQDT has outperformed GOLDX with an annualized return of 16.82%, while GOLDX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.95% annualized return.


LQDT

YTD

12.95%

1M

13.72%

6M

64.72%

1Y

107.92%

5Y*

46.05%

10Y*

16.82%

GOLDX

YTD

9.47%

1M

8.66%

6M

9.27%

1Y

39.15%

5Y*

7.05%

10Y*

6.95%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LQDT vs. GOLDX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LQDT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LQDT is 9494
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LQDT is 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LQDT is 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LQDT is 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LQDT is 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LQDT is 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

GOLDX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GOLDX is 6565
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GOLDX is 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GOLDX is 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GOLDX is 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GOLDX is 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GOLDX is 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LQDT vs. GOLDX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT) and Gabelli Gold Fund (GOLDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LQDT, currently valued at 2.48, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.002.481.51
The chart of Sortino ratio for LQDT, currently valued at 3.98, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.003.982.06
The chart of Omega ratio for LQDT, currently valued at 1.55, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.551.26
The chart of Calmar ratio for LQDT, currently valued at 1.42, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.420.66
The chart of Martin ratio for LQDT, currently valued at 24.05, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0024.055.29
LQDT
GOLDX

The current LQDT Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is higher than the GOLDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LQDT and GOLDX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.50AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
2.48
1.51
LQDT
GOLDX

Dividends

LQDT vs. GOLDX - Dividend Comparison

LQDT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GOLDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%.


TTM202420232022202120202019201820172016
LQDT
Liquidity Services, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GOLDX
Gabelli Gold Fund
1.93%2.11%1.13%0.00%0.00%1.69%0.83%0.34%0.52%2.18%

Drawdowns

LQDT vs. GOLDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LQDT drawdown since its inception was -95.31%, which is greater than GOLDX's maximum drawdown of -79.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQDT and GOLDX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-44.12%
-40.36%
LQDT
GOLDX

Volatility

LQDT vs. GOLDX - Volatility Comparison

Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT) has a higher volatility of 9.87% compared to Gabelli Gold Fund (GOLDX) at 6.34%. This indicates that LQDT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GOLDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
9.87%
6.34%
LQDT
GOLDX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab