LQDT vs. SBERP.ME

In the year-to-date period, LQDT achieves a 46.31% return, which is significantly higher than SBERP.ME's -13.33% return. Over the past 10 years, LQDT has underperformed SBERP.ME with an annualized return of 8.93%, while SBERP.ME has yielded a comparatively higher 21.97% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT) and Sberbank of Russia (SBERP.ME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current LQDT Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is higher than the SBERP.ME Sharpe Ratio of -0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LQDT and SBERP.ME, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither LQDT nor SBERP.ME has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum LQDT drawdown since its inception was -95.31%, roughly equal to the maximum SBERP.ME drawdown of -91.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQDT and SBERP.ME. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT) is 8.71%, while Sberbank of Russia (SBERP.ME) has a volatility of 10.93%. This indicates that LQDT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBERP.ME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Liquidity Services, Inc. and Sberbank of Russia. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.