LQDT vs. LKOH.ME

In the year-to-date period, LQDT achieves a 46.31% return, which is significantly higher than LKOH.ME's 8.20% return. Over the past 10 years, LQDT has underperformed LKOH.ME with an annualized return of 8.93%, while LKOH.ME has yielded a comparatively higher 20.90% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT) and PJSC LUKOIL (LKOH.ME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current LQDT Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is higher than the LKOH.ME Sharpe Ratio of 0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LQDT and LKOH.ME, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

LQDT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LKOH.ME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.85%.

The maximum LQDT drawdown since its inception was -95.31%, which is greater than LKOH.ME's maximum drawdown of -71.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQDT and LKOH.ME. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT) has a higher volatility of 8.71% compared to PJSC LUKOIL (LKOH.ME) at 6.92%. This indicates that LQDT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LKOH.ME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Liquidity Services, Inc. and PJSC LUKOIL. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.