PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLXY vs. CRWV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GLXY vs. CRWV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Galaxy Digital Inc. (GLXY) and CoreWeave, Inc. (CRWV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLXY achieves a -6.04% return, which is significantly lower than CRWV's 0.22% return.


GLXY

1D
-2.37%
1M
-14.56%
6M
-25.65%
YTD
-6.04%
1Y
-21.84%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-8.86%

CRWV

1D
-2.88%
1M
-12.20%
6M
-22.99%
YTD
0.22%
1Y
-31.08%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
57.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.96B$1.98B$2.88B
$133.62M$141.92M$181.78M

GLXY vs. CRWV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
GLXY
Galaxy Digital Inc.
-6.04%-4.85%
CRWV
CoreWeave, Inc.
0.22%8.88%

Correlation

The correlation between GLXY and CRWV is 0.51, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2025

0.42

The correlation between GLXY and CRWV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.42 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GLXY:

$6.97B

CRWV:

$39.16B

EPS

GLXY:

$0.16

CRWV:

-$3.27

PS Ratio

GLXY:

0.75

CRWV:

5.61

Total Revenue (TTM)

GLXY:

$57.33B

CRWV:

$6.23B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GLXY:

$46.78B

CRWV:

$4.32B

EBITDA (TTM)

GLXY:

$577.49M

CRWV:

$1.89B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLXY vs. CRWV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GLXY
GLXY Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
GLXY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLXY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLXY Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
GLXY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLXY Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

CRWV
CRWV Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
CRWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRWV Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
CRWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRWV Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GLXY vs. CRWV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Galaxy Digital Inc. (GLXY) and CoreWeave, Inc. (CRWV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GLXYCRWVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.00

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.43

-0.63

+0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.73

-1.04

+0.31

GLXY vs. CRWV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLXY Sharpe Ratio is -0.29, which is comparable to the CRWV Sharpe Ratio of -0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLXY and CRWV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GLXY vs. CRWV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLXY drawdown since its inception was -60.71%, smaller than the maximum CRWV drawdown of -66.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLXY and CRWV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLXYCRWVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.71%

-66.87%

+6.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-60.71%

-59.11%

-1.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-50.98%

-60.91%

+9.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.18%

-38.69%

+9.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

35.74%

35.87%

-0.13%

Volatility

GLXY vs. CRWV - Volatility Comparison

Galaxy Digital Inc. (GLXY) and CoreWeave, Inc. (CRWV) have volatilities of 30.77% and 31.84%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLXYCRWVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

30.77%

31.84%

-1.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

70.62%

68.91%

+1.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

91.24%

97.38%

-6.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

90.32%

113.24%

-22.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

90.32%

113.24%

-22.92%

Dividends

GLXY vs. CRWV - Dividend Comparison

Neither GLXY nor CRWV has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

GLXY vs. CRWV - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Galaxy Digital Inc. and CoreWeave, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

GLXY vs. CRWV - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Galaxy Digital Inc. and CoreWeave, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

GLXY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Galaxy Digital Inc. reported a gross profit of 9.96B and revenue of 10.04B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 99.2%.

CRWV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CoreWeave, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.36B and revenue of 2.08B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 65.5%.

GLXY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Galaxy Digital Inc. reported an operating income of 171.78M and revenue of 10.04B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.7%.

CRWV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CoreWeave, Inc. reported an operating income of -144.00M and revenue of 2.08B, resulting in an operating margin of -6.9%.

GLXY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Galaxy Digital Inc. reported a net income of -216.31M and revenue of 10.04B, resulting in a net margin of -2.2%.

CRWV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CoreWeave, Inc. reported a net income of -740.00M and revenue of 2.08B, resulting in a net margin of -35.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GLXY and CRWV have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CRWV has higher volatility (31.84%) compared to GLXY (30.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLXY dropped -60.71% vs CRWV's -66.87%.

GLXY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.29 vs -0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLXY and CRWV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer