PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LQDT vs. QRHC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between LQDT and QRHC is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.1

Performance

LQDT vs. QRHC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT) and Quest Resource Holding Corporation (QRHC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-40.00%-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
65.99%
-31.12%
LQDT
QRHC

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LQDT:

2.48

QRHC:

-0.41

Sortino Ratio

LQDT:

3.98

QRHC:

-0.34

Omega Ratio

LQDT:

1.55

QRHC:

0.96

Calmar Ratio

LQDT:

1.42

QRHC:

-0.19

Martin Ratio

LQDT:

24.05

QRHC:

-0.75

Ulcer Index

LQDT:

4.52%

QRHC:

22.76%

Daily Std Dev

LQDT:

44.06%

QRHC:

42.01%

Max Drawdown

LQDT:

-95.31%

QRHC:

-97.70%

Current Drawdown

LQDT:

-44.12%

QRHC:

-88.10%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LQDT:

$1.12B

QRHC:

$119.41M

EPS

LQDT:

$0.63

QRHC:

-$0.38

PEG Ratio

LQDT:

1.78

QRHC:

0.99

Total Revenue (TTM)

LQDT:

$291.99M

QRHC:

$218.56M

Gross Profit (TTM)

LQDT:

$142.17M

QRHC:

$34.54M

EBITDA (TTM)

LQDT:

$31.91M

QRHC:

$10.43M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LQDT achieves a 12.95% return, which is significantly higher than QRHC's -10.77% return. Over the past 10 years, LQDT has outperformed QRHC with an annualized return of 16.82%, while QRHC has yielded a comparatively lower -5.32% annualized return.


LQDT

YTD

12.95%

1M

13.72%

6M

64.72%

1Y

107.92%

5Y*

46.05%

10Y*

16.82%

QRHC

YTD

-10.77%

1M

-4.29%

6M

-31.44%

1Y

-14.83%

5Y*

19.19%

10Y*

-5.32%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LQDT vs. QRHC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LQDT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LQDT is 9494
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LQDT is 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LQDT is 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LQDT is 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LQDT is 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LQDT is 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

QRHC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QRHC is 2727
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QRHC is 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QRHC is 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QRHC is 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QRHC is 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QRHC is 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LQDT vs. QRHC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT) and Quest Resource Holding Corporation (QRHC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LQDT, currently valued at 2.48, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.002.48-0.41
The chart of Sortino ratio for LQDT, currently valued at 3.98, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.003.98-0.34
The chart of Omega ratio for LQDT, currently valued at 1.55, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.550.96
The chart of Calmar ratio for LQDT, currently valued at 1.42, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.42-0.19
The chart of Martin ratio for LQDT, currently valued at 24.05, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0024.05-0.75
LQDT
QRHC

The current LQDT Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is higher than the QRHC Sharpe Ratio of -0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LQDT and QRHC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
2.48
-0.41
LQDT
QRHC

Dividends

LQDT vs. QRHC - Dividend Comparison

Neither LQDT nor QRHC has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

LQDT vs. QRHC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LQDT drawdown since its inception was -95.31%, roughly equal to the maximum QRHC drawdown of -97.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQDT and QRHC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-90.00%-80.00%-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-44.12%
-88.10%
LQDT
QRHC

Volatility

LQDT vs. QRHC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT) is 9.87%, while Quest Resource Holding Corporation (QRHC) has a volatility of 11.61%. This indicates that LQDT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QRHC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
9.87%
11.61%
LQDT
QRHC

Financials

LQDT vs. QRHC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Liquidity Services, Inc. and Quest Resource Holding Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab