LQDT vs. QRHC

In the year-to-date period, LQDT achieves a 47.59% return, which is significantly higher than QRHC's -2.05% return. Over the past 10 years, LQDT has outperformed QRHC with an annualized return of 9.11%, while QRHC has yielded a comparatively lower -4.43% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT) and Quest Resource Holding Corporation (QRHC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current LQDT Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is higher than the QRHC Sharpe Ratio of -0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LQDT and QRHC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither LQDT nor QRHC has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum LQDT drawdown since its inception was -95.31%, roughly equal to the maximum QRHC drawdown of -97.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQDT and QRHC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT) is 8.67%, while Quest Resource Holding Corporation (QRHC) has a volatility of 16.50%. This indicates that LQDT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QRHC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Liquidity Services, Inc. and Quest Resource Holding Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.