PortfoliosLab logo
LQDT vs. QRHC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between LQDT and QRHC is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

LQDT vs. QRHC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT) and Quest Resource Holding Corporation (QRHC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LQDT:

0.41

QRHC:

-1.19

Sortino Ratio

LQDT:

1.11

QRHC:

-2.28

Omega Ratio

LQDT:

1.15

QRHC:

0.69

Calmar Ratio

LQDT:

0.31

QRHC:

-0.79

Martin Ratio

LQDT:

1.74

QRHC:

-1.86

Ulcer Index

LQDT:

12.63%

QRHC:

40.82%

Daily Std Dev

LQDT:

48.71%

QRHC:

63.67%

Max Drawdown

LQDT:

-95.31%

QRHC:

-97.70%

Current Drawdown

LQDT:

-64.19%

QRHC:

-95.48%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LQDT:

$724.32M

QRHC:

$45.81M

EPS

LQDT:

$0.79

QRHC:

-$1.20

PEG Ratio

LQDT:

1.78

QRHC:

1.24

PS Ratio

LQDT:

1.65

QRHC:

0.16

PB Ratio

LQDT:

3.69

QRHC:

1.03

Total Revenue (TTM)

LQDT:

$439.25M

QRHC:

$284.31M

Gross Profit (TTM)

LQDT:

$195.73M

QRHC:

$44.52M

EBITDA (TTM)

LQDT:

$40.96M

QRHC:

-$9.71M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LQDT achieves a -27.62% return, which is significantly higher than QRHC's -66.15% return. Over the past 10 years, LQDT has outperformed QRHC with an annualized return of 9.11%, while QRHC has yielded a comparatively lower -12.79% annualized return.


LQDT

YTD

-27.62%

1M

-26.46%

6M

-8.60%

1Y

19.78%

3Y*

19.89%

5Y*

32.56%

10Y*

9.11%

QRHC

YTD

-66.15%

1M

-6.78%

6M

-69.90%

1Y

-75.77%

3Y*

-20.63%

5Y*

10.59%

10Y*

-12.79%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Liquidity Services, Inc.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

LQDT vs. QRHC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LQDT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LQDT is 6767
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LQDT is 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LQDT is 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LQDT is 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LQDT is 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LQDT is 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

QRHC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QRHC is 22
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QRHC is 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QRHC is 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QRHC is 22
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QRHC is 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QRHC is 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LQDT vs. QRHC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT) and Quest Resource Holding Corporation (QRHC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current LQDT Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is higher than the QRHC Sharpe Ratio of -1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LQDT and QRHC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

LQDT vs. QRHC - Dividend Comparison

Neither LQDT nor QRHC has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

LQDT vs. QRHC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LQDT drawdown since its inception was -95.31%, roughly equal to the maximum QRHC drawdown of -97.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQDT and QRHC.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

LQDT vs. QRHC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT) is 16.83%, while Quest Resource Holding Corporation (QRHC) has a volatility of 25.28%. This indicates that LQDT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QRHC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

LQDT vs. QRHC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Liquidity Services, Inc. and Quest Resource Holding Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


20.00M40.00M60.00M80.00M100.00M120.00M20212022202320242025
116.38M
68.43M
(LQDT) Total Revenue
(QRHC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LQDT vs. QRHC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Liquidity Services, Inc. and Quest Resource Holding Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
40.8%
16.0%
(LQDT) Gross Margin
(QRHC) Gross Margin
LQDT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Liquidity Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 47.43M and revenue of 116.38M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.8%.

QRHC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Quest Resource Holding Corporation reported a gross profit of 10.93M and revenue of 68.43M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 16.0%.

LQDT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Liquidity Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 6.80M and revenue of 116.38M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.9%.

QRHC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Quest Resource Holding Corporation reported an operating income of -8.16M and revenue of 68.43M, resulting in an operating margin of -11.9%.

LQDT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Liquidity Services, Inc. reported a net income of 7.05M and revenue of 116.38M, resulting in a net margin of 6.1%.

QRHC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Quest Resource Holding Corporation reported a net income of -10.41M and revenue of 68.43M, resulting in a net margin of -15.2%.