LPRO vs. KMB
LPRO (Open Lending Corporation) and KMB (Kimberly-Clark Corporation) are both stocks. LPRO operates in Credit Services (Financial Services), while KMB operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 5 years, LPRO returned -39.27%/yr vs -0.50%/yr for KMB. Their 0.04 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
LPRO vs. KMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LPRO achieves a 102.58% return, which is significantly higher than KMB's 11.19% return.
LPRO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.96%
- 6M
- 75.42%
- YTD
- 102.58%
- 1Y
- 45.37%
- 3Y*
- -34.61%
- 5Y*
- -39.27%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -12.51%
KMB
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- -4.72%
- 6M
- 12.19%
- YTD
- 11.19%
- 1Y
- -12.23%
- 3Y*
- -1.48%
- 5Y*
- -0.50%
- 10Y*
- 1.74%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.90%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $325.44M | $393.74M | $451.43M | |
| $4.51M | $5.67M | $7.99M |
LPRO vs. KMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LPRO Open Lending Corporation | 102.58% | -74.04% | -29.85% | 26.07% | -69.97% | -35.70% | 231.69% | 8.10% | 1.04% |
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 11.19% | -19.86% | 11.79% | -7.08% | -1.58% | 9.66% | 0.95% | 24.57% | 4.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between LPRO and KMB is 0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2018 | 0.04 |
Fundamentals
LPRO:
$371.53M
KMB:
$36.28B
LPRO:
-$0.04
KMB:
$5.93
LPRO:
4.15
KMB:
2.20
LPRO:
4.91
KMB:
20.28
LPRO:
$89.32M
KMB:
$16.54B
LPRO:
$67.73M
KMB:
$5.93B
LPRO:
-$1.99M
KMB:
$3.07B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LPRO vs. KMB — Risk / Return Rank
LPRO
KMB
LPRO vs. KMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Open Lending Corporation (LPRO) and Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LPRO | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 0.97 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.84 | -0.27 | +1.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.60 | -0.39 | +1.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LPRO vs. KMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LPRO drawdown since its inception was -98.06%, which is greater than KMB's maximum drawdown of -36.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LPRO and KMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LPRO | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.06% | -36.97% | -61.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -51.61% | -29.60% | -22.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -92.02% | -34.06% | -57.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -98.01% | -34.06% | -63.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.71% | -21.48% | -71.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -50.39% | -8.89% | -41.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.23% | 20.31% | +6.92% |
Volatility
LPRO vs. KMB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Open Lending Corporation (LPRO) is 1.48%, while Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) has a volatility of 8.53%. This indicates that LPRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LPRO | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.48% | 8.53% | -7.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 62.73% | 18.63% | +44.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 83.20% | 27.16% | +56.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 73.27% | 20.63% | +52.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.92% | 21.25% | +39.67% |
Dividends
LPRO vs. KMB - Dividend Comparison
LPRO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.65%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 4.65% | 5.00% | 3.72% | 3.88% | 3.42% | 3.19% | 3.17% | 3.00% | 3.51% | 3.22% | 3.22% | 2.77% |
LPRO Open Lending Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
LPRO vs. KMB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Open Lending Corporation and Kimberly-Clark Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LPRO vs. KMB - Profitability Comparison
LPRO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Open Lending Corporation reported a gross profit of 15.64M and revenue of 20.49M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.3%.
KMB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.53B and revenue of 4.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.
LPRO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Open Lending Corporation reported an operating income of -633.00K and revenue of 20.49M, resulting in an operating margin of -3.1%.
KMB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported an operating income of 753.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.1%.
LPRO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Open Lending Corporation reported a net income of -460.00K and revenue of 20.49M, resulting in a net margin of -2.2%.
KMB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a net income of 521.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LPRO and KMB have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KMB has higher volatility (8.53%) compared to LPRO (1.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LPRO dropped -98.06% vs KMB's -36.97%.
LPRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.53 vs -0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LPRO and KMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer