LPEFX vs. FGIAX
Compare and contrast key facts about ALPS/Red Rocks Global Opportunity Fund (LPEFX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX).
LPEFX is managed by ALPS. It was launched on Dec 30, 2007. FGIAX is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index NR. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007.
Performance
LPEFX vs. FGIAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LPEFX vs. FGIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LPEFX ALPS/Red Rocks Global Opportunity Fund | -17.57% | 1.25% | 17.78% | 28.31% | -28.82% | 23.70% | 9.35% | 49.57% | -12.60% | 27.02% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.53% | 17.73% | 10.70% | 8.51% | -6.23% | 14.51% | -2.76% | 29.32% | -7.91% | 19.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LPEFX achieves a -17.57% return, which is significantly lower than FGIAX's 9.53% return. Over the past 10 years, LPEFX has underperformed FGIAX with an annualized return of 8.14%, while FGIAX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.70% annualized return.
LPEFX
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- -8.58%
- YTD
- -17.57%
- 6M
- -18.30%
- 1Y
- -13.21%
- 3Y*
- 6.58%
- 5Y*
- 1.43%
- 10Y*
- 8.14%
FGIAX
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -3.78%
- YTD
- 9.53%
- 6M
- 10.02%
- 1Y
- 20.91%
- 3Y*
- 14.03%
- 5Y*
- 10.45%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LPEFX vs. FGIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LPEFX has a 1.46% expense ratio, which is higher than FGIAX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LPEFX vs. FGIAX — Risk / Return Rank
LPEFX
FGIAX
LPEFX vs. FGIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS/Red Rocks Global Opportunity Fund (LPEFX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LPEFX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.66 | 1.75 | -2.42 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.80 | 2.26 | -3.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.35 | -0.46 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.68 | 2.61 | -3.29 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -2.03 | 12.12 | -14.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LPEFX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.66 | 1.75 | -2.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 | 0.80 | -0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | 0.58 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.42 | -0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between LPEFX and FGIAX is 0.70, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
LPEFX vs. FGIAX - Dividend Comparison
LPEFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.65%, more than FGIAX's 9.12% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LPEFX ALPS/Red Rocks Global Opportunity Fund | 18.65% | 15.38% | 15.95% | 5.56% | 0.00% | 26.79% | 3.96% | 21.96% | 4.58% | 13.29% | 1.55% | 8.21% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.12% | 9.99% | 7.46% | 2.27% | 6.11% | 7.20% | 1.38% | 7.06% | 6.32% | 5.83% | 8.23% | 3.05% |
Drawdowns
LPEFX vs. FGIAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LPEFX drawdown since its inception was -77.00%, which is greater than FGIAX's maximum drawdown of -49.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LPEFX and FGIAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LPEFX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.00% | -49.35% | -27.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.00% | -8.29% | -13.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.19% | -21.08% | -28.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.19% | -38.02% | -11.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.97% | -3.78% | -24.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.78% | -7.22% | -15.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.38% | 1.78% | +5.60% |
Volatility
LPEFX vs. FGIAX - Volatility Comparison
ALPS/Red Rocks Global Opportunity Fund (LPEFX) has a higher volatility of 6.04% compared to Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) at 4.05%. This indicates that LPEFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LPEFX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.04% | 4.05% | +1.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.47% | 7.09% | +6.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.66% | 12.28% | +8.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.37% | 13.08% | +11.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.76% | 15.17% | +7.59% |