FGIAX vs. RTXAX
FGIAX (Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A) and RTXAX (Russell Investment Tax-Managed Real Assets Fund) are both mutual funds - FGIAX is a Infrastructure Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Infrastructure Index NR, while RTXAX is a Global Equities fund managed by BlackRock. Over the past 5 years, FGIAX returned 9.59%/yr vs 6.57%/yr for RTXAX. Their correlation of 0.84 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FGIAX charges 1.21%/yr vs 1.33%/yr for RTXAX.
Performance
FGIAX vs. RTXAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGIAX achieves a 11.78% return, which is significantly lower than RTXAX's 17.49% return.
FGIAX
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -1.91%
- 6M
- 6.48%
- YTD
- 11.78%
- 1Y
- 15.52%
- 3Y*
- 14.04%
- 5Y*
- 9.59%
- 10Y*
- 8.21%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.95%
RTXAX
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- 1.95%
- 6M
- 9.82%
- YTD
- 17.49%
- 1Y
- 28.12%
- 3Y*
- 10.95%
- 5Y*
- 6.57%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.53%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
FGIAX vs. RTXAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 11.78% | 17.73% | 10.70% | 8.51% | -6.23% | 14.51% | -2.76% | 8.21% |
RTXAX Russell Investment Tax-Managed Real Assets Fund | 17.49% | 13.56% | 1.50% | 7.40% | -11.66% | 26.57% | 3.73% | 6.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between FGIAX and RTXAX is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2019 | 0.84 |
The correlation between FGIAX and RTXAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FGIAX vs. RTXAX — Risk / Return Rank
FGIAX
RTXAX
FGIAX vs. RTXAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) and Russell Investment Tax-Managed Real Assets Fund (RTXAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FGIAX | RTXAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.42 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.68 | 5.06 | -2.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.31 | 18.10 | -9.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FGIAX vs. RTXAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGIAX drawdown since its inception was -49.35%, which is greater than RTXAX's maximum drawdown of -40.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGIAX and RTXAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGIAX | RTXAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.35% | -40.68% | -8.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.04% | -5.21% | -0.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.68% | -17.13% | +7.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.08% | -24.63% | +3.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.72% | -0.89% | -1.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.13% | -7.64% | +0.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.94% | 1.46% | +0.48% |
Volatility
FGIAX vs. RTXAX - Volatility Comparison
Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) has a higher volatility of 3.34% compared to Russell Investment Tax-Managed Real Assets Fund (RTXAX) at 2.50%. This indicates that FGIAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RTXAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FGIAX | RTXAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.34% | 2.50% | +0.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.07% | 8.30% | +0.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.70% | 10.89% | -0.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.25% | 15.75% | -2.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.16% | 19.90% | -4.74% |
FGIAX vs. RTXAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGIAX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is lower than RTXAX's 1.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
FGIAX vs. RTXAX - Dividend Comparison
FGIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.27%, more than RTXAX's 2.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 14.27% | 9.99% | 7.46% | 2.27% | 6.11% | 7.20% | 1.38% | 7.06% | 6.32% | 5.83% | 8.23% | 3.05% |
RTXAX Russell Investment Tax-Managed Real Assets Fund | 2.44% | 2.86% | 2.05% | 1.98% | 3.11% | 1.74% | 1.71% | 0.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FGIAX and RTXAX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FGIAX has higher volatility (3.34%) compared to RTXAX (2.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGIAX dropped -49.35% vs RTXAX's -40.68%.
RTXAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FGIAX and RTXAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer