FGIAX vs. RTXAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) and Russell Investment Tax-Managed Real Assets Fund (RTXAX).
FGIAX is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index NR. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007. RTXAX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Jun 9, 2019.
Performance
FGIAX vs. RTXAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FGIAX vs. RTXAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.53% | 17.73% | 10.70% | 8.51% | -6.23% | 14.51% | -2.76% | 7.26% |
RTXAX Russell Investment Tax-Managed Real Assets Fund | 11.49% | 13.56% | 1.50% | 7.40% | -11.66% | 26.57% | 3.73% | 6.17% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGIAX achieves a 9.53% return, which is significantly lower than RTXAX's 11.49% return.
FGIAX
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -3.78%
- YTD
- 9.53%
- 6M
- 10.02%
- 1Y
- 20.91%
- 3Y*
- 14.03%
- 5Y*
- 10.45%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
RTXAX
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -2.88%
- YTD
- 11.49%
- 6M
- 14.38%
- 1Y
- 24.85%
- 3Y*
- 10.58%
- 5Y*
- 7.43%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FGIAX vs. RTXAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGIAX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is lower than RTXAX's 1.33% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FGIAX vs. RTXAX — Risk / Return Rank
FGIAX
RTXAX
FGIAX vs. RTXAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) and Russell Investment Tax-Managed Real Assets Fund (RTXAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FGIAX | RTXAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.75 | 1.69 | +0.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.26 | 2.24 | +0.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.35 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.61 | 1.89 | +0.72 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.12 | 10.79 | +1.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FGIAX | RTXAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.75 | 1.69 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.47 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.40 | +0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between FGIAX and RTXAX is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FGIAX vs. RTXAX - Dividend Comparison
FGIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.12%, more than RTXAX's 2.57% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.12% | 9.99% | 7.46% | 2.27% | 6.11% | 7.20% | 1.38% | 7.06% | 6.32% | 5.83% | 8.23% | 3.05% |
RTXAX Russell Investment Tax-Managed Real Assets Fund | 2.57% | 2.86% | 2.05% | 1.98% | 3.11% | 1.74% | 1.71% | 0.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FGIAX vs. RTXAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGIAX drawdown since its inception was -49.35%, which is greater than RTXAX's maximum drawdown of -40.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGIAX and RTXAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGIAX | RTXAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.35% | -40.68% | -8.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.29% | -13.11% | +4.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.08% | -24.63% | +3.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.78% | -3.32% | -0.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.22% | -7.96% | +0.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.78% | 2.29% | -0.51% |
Volatility
FGIAX vs. RTXAX - Volatility Comparison
Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) and Russell Investment Tax-Managed Real Assets Fund (RTXAX) have volatilities of 4.05% and 4.12%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FGIAX | RTXAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.05% | 4.12% | -0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.09% | 8.24% | -1.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.28% | 15.04% | -2.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.08% | 15.85% | -2.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.17% | 20.26% | -5.09% |