LPEFX vs. SMRSX
LPEFX (ALPS/Red Rocks Global Opportunity Fund) and SMRSX (ALPS/Smith Short Duration Bond Fund) are both mutual funds - LPEFX is a Global Equities fund managed by ALPS, while SMRSX is a Short-Term Bond fund managed by ALPS. Over the past 5 years, LPEFX returned 2.59%/yr vs 2.21%/yr for SMRSX. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LPEFX charges 1.46%/yr vs 0.93%/yr for SMRSX.
Performance
LPEFX vs. SMRSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LPEFX achieves a -7.03% return, which is significantly lower than SMRSX's 0.65% return.
LPEFX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.34%
- YTD
- -7.03%
- 6M
- -7.68%
- 1Y
- -3.95%
- 3Y*
- 8.37%
- 5Y*
- 2.59%
- 10Y*
- 9.15%
SMRSX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 0.65%
- 6M
- 0.81%
- 1Y
- 3.41%
- 3Y*
- 4.72%
- 5Y*
- 2.21%
- 10Y*
- —
LPEFX vs. SMRSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LPEFX ALPS/Red Rocks Global Opportunity Fund | -7.03% | 1.25% | 17.78% | 28.31% | -28.82% | 23.70% | 9.35% | 49.57% | -11.36% |
SMRSX ALPS/Smith Short Duration Bond Fund | 0.65% | 5.38% | 4.50% | 4.73% | -3.47% | -0.39% | 6.27% | 4.13% | 0.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between LPEFX and SMRSX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2018 | 0.18 |
Over the past year, LPEFX and SMRSX have become more correlated (0.39) than their long-term average of 0.18, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LPEFX vs. SMRSX — Risk / Return Rank
LPEFX
SMRSX
LPEFX vs. SMRSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS/Red Rocks Global Opportunity Fund (LPEFX) and ALPS/Smith Short Duration Bond Fund (SMRSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LPEFX | SMRSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.62 | -0.64 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.19 | 3.73 | -3.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.44 | 15.44 | -15.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LPEFX vs. SMRSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LPEFX drawdown since its inception was -77.00%, which is greater than SMRSX's maximum drawdown of -5.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LPEFX and SMRSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LPEFX | SMRSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.00% | -5.62% | -71.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.00% | -0.95% | -21.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.00% | -0.95% | -21.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.19% | -5.62% | -43.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.19% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.75% | -0.10% | -18.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.75% | -0.85% | -21.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.62% | 0.23% | +9.39% |
Volatility
LPEFX vs. SMRSX - Volatility Comparison
ALPS/Red Rocks Global Opportunity Fund (LPEFX) has a higher volatility of 6.08% compared to ALPS/Smith Short Duration Bond Fund (SMRSX) at 0.47%. This indicates that LPEFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMRSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LPEFX | SMRSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.08% | 0.47% | +5.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.94% | 1.05% | +13.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.24% | 1.37% | +16.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.61% | 1.70% | +22.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.89% | 1.59% | +21.30% |
LPEFX vs. SMRSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LPEFX has a 1.46% expense ratio, which is higher than SMRSX's 0.93% expense ratio.
Dividends
LPEFX vs. SMRSX - Dividend Comparison
LPEFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.54%, more than SMRSX's 3.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LPEFX ALPS/Red Rocks Global Opportunity Fund | 16.54% | 15.38% | 15.95% | 5.56% | 0.00% | 26.79% | 3.96% | 21.96% | 4.58% | 13.29% | 1.55% | 8.21% |
SMRSX ALPS/Smith Short Duration Bond Fund | 3.87% | 3.95% | 4.11% | 3.50% | 0.84% | 0.56% | 1.92% | 2.86% | 0.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LPEFX and SMRSX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LPEFX has higher volatility (6.08%) compared to SMRSX (0.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LPEFX dropped -77.00% vs SMRSX's -5.62%.
SMRSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LPEFX and SMRSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer