FGIAX vs. CWGIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) and American Funds Capital World Growth and Income Fund Class A (CWGIX).
FGIAX is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index NR. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007. CWGIX is managed by American Funds. It was launched on Mar 26, 1993.
Performance
FGIAX vs. CWGIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FGIAX vs. CWGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.53% | 17.73% | 10.70% | 8.51% | -6.23% | 14.51% | -2.76% | 29.32% | -7.91% | 19.40% |
CWGIX American Funds Capital World Growth and Income Fund Class A | -4.19% | 24.68% | 13.85% | 20.55% | -17.32% | 14.74% | 15.31% | 25.32% | -10.60% | 24.55% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGIAX achieves a 9.53% return, which is significantly higher than CWGIX's -4.19% return. Over the past 10 years, FGIAX has underperformed CWGIX with an annualized return of 8.70%, while CWGIX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.27% annualized return.
FGIAX
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -3.78%
- YTD
- 9.53%
- 6M
- 10.02%
- 1Y
- 20.91%
- 3Y*
- 14.03%
- 5Y*
- 10.45%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
CWGIX
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- -9.84%
- YTD
- -4.19%
- 6M
- -0.07%
- 1Y
- 19.60%
- 3Y*
- 15.56%
- 5Y*
- 8.31%
- 10Y*
- 10.27%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FGIAX vs. CWGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGIAX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than CWGIX's 0.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FGIAX vs. CWGIX — Risk / Return Rank
FGIAX
CWGIX
FGIAX vs. CWGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) and American Funds Capital World Growth and Income Fund Class A (CWGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FGIAX | CWGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.75 | 1.23 | +0.52 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.26 | 1.78 | +0.47 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.25 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.61 | 1.57 | +1.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.12 | 6.75 | +5.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FGIAX | CWGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.75 | 1.23 | +0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.56 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | 0.65 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.65 | -0.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between FGIAX and CWGIX is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FGIAX vs. CWGIX - Dividend Comparison
FGIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.12%, less than CWGIX's 11.03% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.12% | 9.99% | 7.46% | 2.27% | 6.11% | 7.20% | 1.38% | 7.06% | 6.32% | 5.83% | 8.23% | 3.05% |
CWGIX American Funds Capital World Growth and Income Fund Class A | 11.03% | 10.54% | 7.88% | 3.20% | 2.09% | 6.82% | 1.23% | 2.44% | 7.00% | 6.63% | 4.96% | 3.78% |
Drawdowns
FGIAX vs. CWGIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGIAX drawdown since its inception was -49.35%, smaller than the maximum CWGIX drawdown of -54.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGIAX and CWGIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGIAX | CWGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.35% | -54.47% | +5.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.29% | -11.08% | +2.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.08% | -27.18% | +6.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.02% | -32.00% | -6.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.78% | -10.52% | +6.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.22% | -7.16% | -0.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.78% | 2.58% | -0.80% |
Volatility
FGIAX vs. CWGIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) is 4.05%, while American Funds Capital World Growth and Income Fund Class A (CWGIX) has a volatility of 5.20%. This indicates that FGIAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CWGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FGIAX | CWGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.05% | 5.20% | -1.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.09% | 10.06% | -2.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.28% | 15.77% | -3.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.08% | 14.98% | -1.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.17% | 15.94% | -0.77% |