FGIAX vs. PORTX
Compare and contrast key facts about Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) and Trillium ESG Global Equity Fund (PORTX).
FGIAX is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index NR. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007. PORTX is managed by Trillium Mutual Funds. It was launched on Sep 29, 1999.
Performance
FGIAX vs. PORTX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FGIAX vs. PORTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.53% | 17.73% | 10.70% | 8.51% | -6.23% | 14.51% | -2.76% | 29.32% | -7.91% | 19.40% |
PORTX Trillium ESG Global Equity Fund | -7.91% | 1.15% | 7.67% | 19.02% | -24.04% | 22.16% | 24.56% | 28.20% | -7.24% | 27.89% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGIAX achieves a 9.53% return, which is significantly higher than PORTX's -7.91% return. Over the past 10 years, FGIAX has outperformed PORTX with an annualized return of 8.70%, while PORTX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.99% annualized return.
FGIAX
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -3.78%
- YTD
- 9.53%
- 6M
- 10.02%
- 1Y
- 20.91%
- 3Y*
- 14.03%
- 5Y*
- 10.45%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
PORTX
- 1D
- -1.41%
- 1M
- -9.92%
- YTD
- -7.91%
- 6M
- -18.21%
- 1Y
- -4.62%
- 3Y*
- 3.27%
- 5Y*
- 1.30%
- 10Y*
- 7.99%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FGIAX vs. PORTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGIAX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is lower than PORTX's 1.30% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FGIAX vs. PORTX — Risk / Return Rank
FGIAX
PORTX
FGIAX vs. PORTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) and Trillium ESG Global Equity Fund (PORTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FGIAX | PORTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.75 | -0.33 | +2.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.26 | -0.27 | +2.53 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 0.95 | +0.40 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.61 | -0.39 | +3.00 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.12 | -1.08 | +13.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FGIAX | PORTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.75 | -0.33 | +2.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.07 | +0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | 0.45 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.31 | +0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between FGIAX and PORTX is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FGIAX vs. PORTX - Dividend Comparison
FGIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.12%, while PORTX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.12% | 9.99% | 7.46% | 2.27% | 6.11% | 7.20% | 1.38% | 7.06% | 6.32% | 5.83% | 8.23% | 3.05% |
PORTX Trillium ESG Global Equity Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 12.61% | 5.84% | 3.55% | 2.61% | 1.85% | 2.32% | 4.50% | 2.46% | 4.66% | 5.86% |
Drawdowns
FGIAX vs. PORTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGIAX drawdown since its inception was -49.35%, roughly equal to the maximum PORTX drawdown of -51.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGIAX and PORTX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGIAX | PORTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.35% | -51.71% | +2.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.29% | -20.78% | +12.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.08% | -31.32% | +10.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.02% | -31.34% | -6.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.78% | -20.78% | +17.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.22% | -11.73% | +4.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.78% | 7.48% | -5.70% |
Volatility
FGIAX vs. PORTX - Volatility Comparison
Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) has a higher volatility of 4.05% compared to Trillium ESG Global Equity Fund (PORTX) at 3.48%. This indicates that FGIAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PORTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FGIAX | PORTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.05% | 3.48% | +0.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.09% | 17.83% | -10.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.28% | 23.39% | -11.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.08% | 19.06% | -5.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.17% | 18.13% | -2.96% |