PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
FGIAX vs. CSUAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

FGIAX vs. CSUAX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX).

FGIAX is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index NR. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007. CSUAX is a passively managed fund by Cohen & Steers that tracks the performance of the FTSE Global Core Infrastructure 50/50 Index. It was launched on Aug 28, 2017. Both FGIAX and CSUAX are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

FGIAX vs. CSUAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FGIAX vs. CSUAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FGIAX
Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A		9.53%17.73%10.70%8.51%-6.23%14.51%-2.76%29.32%-7.91%19.40%
CSUAX
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A		8.35%14.30%8.30%2.09%-5.20%16.24%-1.65%24.26%-5.83%17.99%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGIAX achieves a 9.53% return, which is significantly higher than CSUAX's 8.35% return. Over the past 10 years, FGIAX has outperformed CSUAX with an annualized return of 8.70%, while CSUAX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.48% annualized return.

FGIAX

1D
0.53%
1M
-3.78%
YTD
9.53%
6M
10.02%
1Y
20.91%
3Y*
14.03%
5Y*
10.45%
10Y*
8.70%

CSUAX

1D
0.34%
1M
-4.38%
YTD
8.35%
6M
8.97%
1Y
17.98%
3Y*
10.78%
5Y*
7.79%
10Y*
7.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A

Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A

Often compared with FGIAX:
FGIAX vs. PORTXFGIAX vs. MFWIXFGIAX vs. RTXAXFGIAX vs. APFDXFGIAX vs. VTFGIAX vs. ARTHXFGIAX vs. CWGIX
Often compared with CSUAX:
CSUAX vs. APFDXCSUAX vs. MVGIXCSUAX vs. GCCHXCSUAX vs. MEGICSUAX vs. LPXZXCSUAX vs. PORTXCSUAX vs. CWGIX

FGIAX vs. CSUAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGIAX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is lower than CSUAX's 1.22% expense ratio.

CSUAX
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A
FGIAX
Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A

Return for Risk

FGIAX vs. CSUAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
FGIAX
FGIAX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FGIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
FGIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
CSUAX
CSUAX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
CSUAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSUAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSUAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
CSUAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSUAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGIAX vs. CSUAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

FGIAXCSUAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.75

1.63

+0.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.26

2.17

+0.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.32

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.61

2.36

+0.24

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.12

10.32

+1.80

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FGIAX vs. CSUAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGIAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the CSUAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGIAX and CSUAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

FGIAXCSUAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.75

1.63

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.61

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.50

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.55

-0.13

Correlation

The correlation between FGIAX and CSUAX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

FGIAX vs. CSUAX - Dividend Comparison

FGIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.12%, more than CSUAX's 7.46% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FGIAX
Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A		9.12%9.99%7.46%2.27%6.11%7.20%1.38%7.06%6.32%5.83%8.23%3.05%
CSUAX
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A		7.46%8.09%2.23%2.17%3.55%2.95%1.30%1.52%2.08%5.00%2.04%6.20%

Drawdowns

FGIAX vs. CSUAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGIAX drawdown since its inception was -49.35%, smaller than the maximum CSUAX drawdown of -52.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGIAX and CSUAX.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

FGIAXCSUAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.35%

-52.20%

+2.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.29%

-7.98%

-0.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.08%

-20.45%

-0.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.02%

-35.05%

-2.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.78%

-4.38%

+0.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.22%

-8.49%

+1.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.78%

1.83%

-0.05%

Volatility

FGIAX vs. CSUAX - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) has a higher volatility of 4.05% compared to Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) at 3.26%. This indicates that FGIAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSUAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

FGIAXCSUAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.05%

3.26%

+0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.09%

6.89%

+0.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.28%

11.48%

+0.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.08%

12.89%

+0.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.17%

14.89%

+0.28%