LPEFX vs. RLIIX
Compare and contrast key facts about ALPS/Red Rocks Global Opportunity Fund (LPEFX) and RiverFront Asset Allocation Growth & Income (RLIIX).
LPEFX is managed by ALPS. It was launched on Dec 30, 2007. RLIIX is managed by ALPS. It was launched on Aug 1, 2010.
Performance
LPEFX vs. RLIIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LPEFX vs. RLIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LPEFX ALPS/Red Rocks Global Opportunity Fund | -17.57% | 1.25% | 17.78% | 28.31% | -28.82% | 23.70% | 9.35% | 49.57% | -12.60% | 27.02% |
RLIIX RiverFront Asset Allocation Growth & Income | -1.75% | 13.74% | 8.77% | 13.37% | -14.99% | 13.57% | 7.10% | 18.51% | -11.07% | 15.00% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LPEFX achieves a -17.57% return, which is significantly lower than RLIIX's -1.75% return. Over the past 10 years, LPEFX has outperformed RLIIX with an annualized return of 8.14%, while RLIIX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.40% annualized return.
LPEFX
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- -8.58%
- YTD
- -17.57%
- 6M
- -18.30%
- 1Y
- -13.21%
- 3Y*
- 6.58%
- 5Y*
- 1.43%
- 10Y*
- 8.14%
RLIIX
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- -5.88%
- YTD
- -1.75%
- 6M
- 0.78%
- 1Y
- 13.55%
- 3Y*
- 10.00%
- 5Y*
- 5.27%
- 10Y*
- 6.40%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LPEFX vs. RLIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LPEFX has a 1.46% expense ratio, which is higher than RLIIX's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LPEFX vs. RLIIX — Risk / Return Rank
LPEFX
RLIIX
LPEFX vs. RLIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS/Red Rocks Global Opportunity Fund (LPEFX) and RiverFront Asset Allocation Growth & Income (RLIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LPEFX | RLIIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.66 | 1.24 | -1.90 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.80 | 1.78 | -2.59 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.26 | -0.36 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.68 | 1.65 | -2.33 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -2.03 | 7.36 | -9.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LPEFX | RLIIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.66 | 1.24 | -1.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 | 0.49 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | 0.53 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.47 | -0.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between LPEFX and RLIIX is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
LPEFX vs. RLIIX - Dividend Comparison
LPEFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.65%, more than RLIIX's 6.34% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LPEFX ALPS/Red Rocks Global Opportunity Fund | 18.65% | 15.38% | 15.95% | 5.56% | 0.00% | 26.79% | 3.96% | 21.96% | 4.58% | 13.29% | 1.55% | 8.21% |
RLIIX RiverFront Asset Allocation Growth & Income | 6.34% | 6.23% | 1.29% | 2.29% | 6.66% | 1.40% | 1.42% | 2.07% | 18.88% | 1.37% | 1.66% | 3.72% |
Drawdowns
LPEFX vs. RLIIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LPEFX drawdown since its inception was -77.00%, which is greater than RLIIX's maximum drawdown of -27.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LPEFX and RLIIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LPEFX | RLIIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.00% | -27.35% | -49.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.00% | -7.88% | -14.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.19% | -21.19% | -28.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.19% | -27.35% | -21.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.97% | -6.43% | -21.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.78% | -4.64% | -18.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.38% | 1.76% | +5.62% |
Volatility
LPEFX vs. RLIIX - Volatility Comparison
ALPS/Red Rocks Global Opportunity Fund (LPEFX) has a higher volatility of 6.04% compared to RiverFront Asset Allocation Growth & Income (RLIIX) at 3.55%. This indicates that LPEFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RLIIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LPEFX | RLIIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.04% | 3.55% | +2.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.47% | 6.53% | +6.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.66% | 11.23% | +9.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.37% | 10.76% | +13.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.76% | 12.04% | +10.72% |