LOVE vs. CLS
LOVE (The Lovesac Company) and CLS (Celestica Inc.) are both stocks. LOVE operates in Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances (Consumer Cyclical), while CLS operates in Electronic Components (Technology). Over the past 5 years, LOVE returned -28.60%/yr vs 121.36%/yr for CLS. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LOVE vs. CLS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LOVE achieves a 4.61% return, which is significantly lower than CLS's 54.98% return.
LOVE
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 0.06%
- YTD
- 4.61%
- 6M
- 9.36%
- 1Y
- -21.07%
- 3Y*
- -12.66%
- 5Y*
- -28.60%
- 10Y*
- —
CLS
- 1D
- -3.02%
- 1M
- 8.89%
- YTD
- 54.98%
- 6M
- 48.55%
- 1Y
- 277.82%
- 3Y*
- 226.85%
- 5Y*
- 121.36%
- 10Y*
- 45.51%
LOVE vs. CLS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LOVE The Lovesac Company | 4.61% | -37.66% | -7.40% | 16.08% | -66.78% | 53.77% | 168.47% | -30.03% | -4.38% |
CLS Celestica Inc. | 54.98% | 220.27% | 215.23% | 159.80% | 1.26% | 37.92% | -2.42% | -5.70% | -25.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between LOVE and CLS is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2018 | 0.25 |
The correlation between LOVE and CLS shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (1 year) to 0.28 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LOVE:
$226.55M
CLS:
$53.01B
LOVE:
$0.28
CLS:
$8.28
LOVE:
55.62
CLS:
55.30
LOVE:
0.32
CLS:
3.84
LOVE:
1.04
CLS:
25.26
LOVE:
$697.12M
CLS:
$13.81B
LOVE:
$393.22M
CLS:
$1.60B
LOVE:
$20.57M
CLS:
$1.32B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LOVE vs. CLS — Risk / Return Rank
LOVE
CLS
LOVE vs. CLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Lovesac Company (LOVE) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LOVE | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.37 | 3.96 | -4.33 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.18 | 3.41 | -3.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.46 | -0.48 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.43 | 9.57 | -10.00 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.77 | 24.15 | -24.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LOVE | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.37 | 3.96 | -4.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.43 | 2.14 | -2.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.92 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.07 | 0.28 | -0.36 |
Drawdowns
LOVE vs. CLS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LOVE drawdown since its inception was -90.79%, smaller than the maximum CLS drawdown of -96.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOVE and CLS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LOVE | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.79% | -96.93% | +6.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.55% | -29.24% | -20.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -72.72% | -53.96% | -18.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -88.47% | -53.96% | -34.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -80.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -83.12% | -3.02% | -80.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -55.00% | -73.38% | +18.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.54% | 11.57% | +15.97% |
Volatility
LOVE vs. CLS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for The Lovesac Company (LOVE) is 9.28%, while Celestica Inc. (CLS) has a volatility of 22.24%. This indicates that LOVE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LOVE | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.28% | 22.24% | -12.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.02% | 53.06% | -14.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.60% | 70.76% | -13.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.34% | 57.21% | +10.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 76.80% | 49.69% | +27.11% |
Dividends
LOVE vs. CLS - Dividend Comparison
Neither LOVE nor CLS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
LOVE vs. CLS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Lovesac Company and Celestica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LOVE vs. CLS - Profitability Comparison
LOVE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Lovesac Company reported a gross profit of 144.00M and revenue of 248.05M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.1%.
CLS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a gross profit of 437.20M and revenue of 4.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.8%.
LOVE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Lovesac Company reported an operating income of 44.94M and revenue of 248.05M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.1%.
CLS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported an operating income of 272.10M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.7%.
LOVE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Lovesac Company reported a net income of 32.11M and revenue of 248.05M, resulting in a net margin of 12.9%.
CLS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a net income of 212.30M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LOVE and CLS have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CLS has higher volatility (22.24%) compared to LOVE (9.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LOVE dropped -90.79% vs CLS's -96.93%.
CLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.96 vs -0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LOVE and CLS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer