LOVE vs. CLS

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about The Lovesac Company (LOVE) and Celestica Inc. (CLS).

Performance

LOVE vs. CLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Lovesac Company (LOVE) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

LOVE vs. CLS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
LOVE The Lovesac Company	-0.95%	-37.66%	-7.40%	16.08%	-66.78%	53.77%	168.47%	-30.03%	-4.38%
CLS Celestica Inc.	-2.33%	220.27%	215.23%	159.80%	1.26%	37.92%	-2.42%	-5.70%	-25.49%

Fundamentals

Market Cap LOVE : $214.51M CLS : $33.46B
EPS LOVE : $0.28 CLS : $7.19
PE Ratio LOVE : 52.79 CLS : 40.14
PS Ratio LOVE : 0.31 CLS : 2.70
PB Ratio LOVE : 0.98 CLS : 15.13
Total Revenue (TTM) LOVE : $697.12M CLS : $12.41B
Gross Profit (TTM) LOVE : $393.22M CLS : $1.44B
EBITDA (TTM) LOVE : $20.57M CLS : $1.21B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LOVE achieves a -0.95% return, which is significantly higher than CLS's -2.33% return.

LOVE

• 1D: -1.08%
• 1M: 14.59%
• YTD: -0.95%
• 6M: -12.51%
• 1Y: -17.27%
• 3Y*: -20.34%
• 5Y*: -24.17%
• 10Y*: —

CLS

• 1D: 2.50%
• 1M: 8.15%
• YTD: -2.33%
• 6M: 14.72%
• 1Y: 265.20%
• 3Y*: 181.82%
• 5Y*: 101.42%
• 10Y*: 38.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

LOVE vs. CLS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LOVE

LOVE Risk / Return Rank: 29
LOVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
LOVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
LOVE Omega Ratio Rank: 31
LOVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
LOVE Martin Ratio Rank: 29

CLS

CLS Risk / Return Rank: 96
CLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
CLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
CLS Omega Ratio Rank: 92
CLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
CLS Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LOVE vs. CLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Lovesac Company (LOVE) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LOVE	CLS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.25	3.72	-3.97
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.09	3.33	-3.24
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	1.44	-0.43
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.39	9.11	-9.50
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.72	24.13	-24.86
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LOVE vs. CLS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LOVE Sharpe Ratio is -0.25, which is lower than the CLS Sharpe Ratio of 3.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LOVE and CLS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LOVE	CLS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.25	3.72	-3.97
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.35	1.83	-2.18
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.80	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.08	0.25	-0.33

Correlation

The correlation between LOVE and CLS is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

LOVE vs. CLS - Dividend Comparison

Neither LOVE nor CLS has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

LOVE vs. CLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LOVE drawdown since its inception was -90.79%, smaller than the maximum CLS drawdown of -96.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOVE and CLS.

Drawdown Indicators

	LOVE	CLS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-90.79%	-96.93%	+6.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-50.61%	-29.24%	-21.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-88.47%	-53.96%	-34.51%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-80.60%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-84.01%	-18.12%	-65.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-54.39%	-73.79%	+19.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	27.15%	11.04%	+16.11%

Volatility

LOVE vs. CLS - Volatility Comparison

The Lovesac Company (LOVE) and Celestica Inc. (CLS) have volatilities of 24.23% and 23.56%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LOVE	CLS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	24.23%	23.56%	+0.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	41.59%	55.01%	-13.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	68.98%	71.85%	-2.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	68.64%	55.71%	+12.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	77.44%	48.75%	+28.69%

Financials

LOVE vs. CLS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The Lovesac Company and Celestica Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

LOVE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Lovesac Company reported a gross profit of 144.00M and revenue of 248.05M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.1%.

CLS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a gross profit of 427.57M and revenue of 3.71B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.5%.

LOVE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Lovesac Company reported an operating income of 44.94M and revenue of 248.05M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.1%.

CLS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Celestica Inc. reported an operating income of 325.73M and revenue of 3.71B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.8%.

LOVE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Lovesac Company reported a net income of 32.11M and revenue of 248.05M, resulting in a net margin of 12.9%.

CLS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a net income of 271.61M and revenue of 3.71B, resulting in a net margin of 7.3%.