LOVE vs. RH
LOVE (The Lovesac Company) and RH (RH) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — LOVE in Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances, RH in Specialty Retail. Over the past 5 years, LOVE returned -28.60%/yr vs -24.30%/yr for RH. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LOVE vs. RH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LOVE achieves a 4.61% return, which is significantly higher than RH's -14.90% return.
LOVE
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 0.06%
- YTD
- 4.61%
- 6M
- 9.36%
- 1Y
- -21.07%
- 3Y*
- -12.66%
- 5Y*
- -28.60%
- 10Y*
- —
RH
- 1D
- -2.36%
- 1M
- 24.60%
- YTD
- -14.90%
- 6M
- -6.07%
- 1Y
- -13.73%
- 3Y*
- -15.45%
- 5Y*
- -24.30%
- 10Y*
- 16.18%
LOVE vs. RH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LOVE The Lovesac Company | 4.61% | -37.66% | -7.40% | 16.08% | -66.78% | 53.77% | 168.47% | -30.03% | -4.38% |
RH RH | -14.90% | -54.48% | 35.03% | 9.09% | -50.15% | 19.76% | 109.61% | 78.18% | -17.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between LOVE and RH is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2018 | 0.47 |
The correlation between LOVE and RH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
LOVE:
$226.55M
RH:
$3.00B
LOVE:
$0.28
RH:
$6.32
LOVE:
55.62
RH:
24.13
LOVE:
0.32
RH:
0.88
LOVE:
1.04
RH:
49.58
LOVE:
$697.12M
RH:
$3.44B
LOVE:
$393.22M
RH:
$1.52B
LOVE:
$20.57M
RH:
$501.48M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LOVE vs. RH — Risk / Return Rank
LOVE
RH
LOVE vs. RH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Lovesac Company (LOVE) and RH (RH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LOVE | RH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.37 | -0.23 | -0.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.18 | 0.08 | -0.26 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.01 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.43 | -0.25 | -0.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.77 | -0.46 | -0.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LOVE | RH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.37 | -0.23 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.43 | -0.40 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.25 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.07 | 0.21 | -0.28 |
Drawdowns
LOVE vs. RH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LOVE drawdown since its inception was -90.79%, which is greater than RH's maximum drawdown of -84.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOVE and RH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LOVE | RH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.79% | -84.72% | -6.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.55% | -55.04% | +5.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -72.72% | -75.17% | +2.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -88.47% | -84.72% | -3.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -84.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -83.12% | -79.36% | -3.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -55.00% | -34.97% | -20.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.54% | 30.17% | -2.63% |
Volatility
LOVE vs. RH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for The Lovesac Company (LOVE) is 9.28%, while RH (RH) has a volatility of 14.98%. This indicates that LOVE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LOVE | RH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.28% | 14.98% | -5.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.02% | 44.90% | -5.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.60% | 60.54% | -2.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.34% | 61.60% | +5.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 76.80% | 64.28% | +12.52% |
Dividends
LOVE vs. RH - Dividend Comparison
Neither LOVE nor RH has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
LOVE vs. RH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Lovesac Company and RH. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LOVE vs. RH - Profitability Comparison
LOVE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Lovesac Company reported a gross profit of 144.00M and revenue of 248.05M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.1%.
RH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RH reported a gross profit of 361.43M and revenue of 842.62M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.9%.
LOVE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Lovesac Company reported an operating income of 44.94M and revenue of 248.05M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.1%.
RH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RH reported an operating income of 93.37M and revenue of 842.62M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.1%.
LOVE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Lovesac Company reported a net income of 32.11M and revenue of 248.05M, resulting in a net margin of 12.9%.
RH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RH reported a net income of 28.78M and revenue of 842.62M, resulting in a net margin of 3.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LOVE and RH have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RH has higher volatility (14.98%) compared to LOVE (9.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LOVE dropped -90.79% vs RH's -84.72%.
RH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.23 vs -0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LOVE and RH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer