PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LOVE vs. NVDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LOVE vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Lovesac Company (LOVE) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LOVE achieves a 4.61% return, which is significantly lower than NVDA's 15.15% return.


LOVE

1D
-0.26%
1M
0.06%
YTD
4.61%
6M
9.36%
1Y
-21.07%
3Y*
-12.66%
5Y*
-28.60%
10Y*

NVDA

1D
-3.62%
1M
8.20%
YTD
15.15%
6M
19.59%
1Y
52.10%
3Y*
76.15%
5Y*
65.05%
10Y*
68.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LOVE vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
LOVE
The Lovesac Company
4.61%-37.66%-7.40%16.08%-66.78%53.77%168.47%-30.03%-4.38%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
15.15%38.92%171.25%239.02%-50.26%125.48%122.30%76.94%-43.28%

Correlation

The correlation between LOVE and NVDA is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2018

0.27

Over the past year, the correlation between LOVE and NVDA has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.27, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LOVE:

$226.55M

NVDA:

$5.24T

EPS

LOVE:

$0.28

NVDA:

$6.53

PE Ratio

LOVE:

55.62

NVDA:

32.91

PS Ratio

LOVE:

0.32

NVDA:

20.72

PB Ratio

LOVE:

1.04

NVDA:

26.80

Total Revenue (TTM)

LOVE:

$697.12M

NVDA:

$253.49B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LOVE:

$393.22M

NVDA:

$187.95B

EBITDA (TTM)

LOVE:

$20.57M

NVDA:

$192.76B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LOVE vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LOVE
LOVE Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
LOVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LOVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
LOVE Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
LOVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
LOVE Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LOVE vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Lovesac Company (LOVE) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LOVENVDADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.26

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.43

2.59

-3.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.77

6.36

-7.13

LOVE vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LOVE Sharpe Ratio is -0.37, which is lower than the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LOVE and NVDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LOVENVDADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.37

1.53

-1.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.43

1.27

-1.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.07

0.63

-0.70

Drawdowns

LOVE vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LOVE drawdown since its inception was -90.79%, roughly equal to the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOVE and NVDA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LOVENVDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.79%

-89.72%

-1.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.55%

-20.21%

-29.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-72.72%

-36.88%

-35.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-88.47%

-66.34%

-22.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-83.12%

-8.90%

-74.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-55.00%

-36.21%

-18.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.54%

8.21%

+19.33%

Volatility

LOVE vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The Lovesac Company (LOVE) is 9.28%, while NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a volatility of 12.53%. This indicates that LOVE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LOVENVDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.28%

12.53%

-3.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.02%

25.54%

+13.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.60%

34.22%

+23.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

67.34%

51.69%

+15.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

76.80%

49.80%

+27.00%

Dividends

LOVE vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

LOVE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LOVE
The Lovesac Company
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.02%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%

Financials

LOVE vs. NVDA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Lovesac Company and NVIDIA Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20222023202420252026
248.05M
81.62B
(LOVE) Total Revenue
(NVDA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LOVE vs. NVDA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The Lovesac Company and NVIDIA Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
58.1%
74.9%
Portfolio components
LOVE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Lovesac Company reported a gross profit of 144.00M and revenue of 248.05M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.1%.

NVDA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a gross profit of 61.16B and revenue of 81.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.9%.

LOVE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Lovesac Company reported an operating income of 44.94M and revenue of 248.05M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.1%.

NVDA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported an operating income of 53.54B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 65.6%.

LOVE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Lovesac Company reported a net income of 32.11M and revenue of 248.05M, resulting in a net margin of 12.9%.

NVDA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a net income of 58.32B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in a net margin of 71.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LOVE and NVDA have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVDA has higher volatility (12.53%) compared to LOVE (9.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LOVE dropped -90.79% vs NVDA's -89.72%.

NVDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs -0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LOVE and NVDA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer