LNG vs. FLKR
LNG (Cheniere Energy, Inc.) is a stock, while FLKR (Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF) is South Korea Equities fund tracking the FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index. Over the past 5 years, LNG returned 26.62%/yr vs 14.07%/yr for FLKR. Their 0.21 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
LNG vs. FLKR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LNG achieves a 36.26% return, which is significantly lower than FLKR's 61.37% return.
LNG
- 1D
- 2.14%
- 1M
- 8.06%
- 6M
- 25.23%
- YTD
- 36.26%
- 1Y
- 12.83%
- 3Y*
- 19.21%
- 5Y*
- 26.62%
- 10Y*
- 21.52%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.85%
FLKR
- 1D
- -2.28%
- 1M
- -15.74%
- 6M
- 29.07%
- YTD
- 61.37%
- 1Y
- 117.49%
- 3Y*
- 35.68%
- 5Y*
- 14.07%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.21%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $43.49M | $47.84M | $51.57M | |
| $449.81M | $470.16M | $533.59M |
LNG vs. FLKR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc. | 36.26% | -8.70% | 27.18% | 15.02% | 49.30% | 69.48% | -1.70% | 3.18% | 9.94% | 9.97% |
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF | 61.37% | 91.91% | -18.84% | 19.16% | -27.50% | -7.54% | 42.64% | 8.88% | -21.30% | 3.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between LNG and FLKR is -0.17, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017 | 0.21 |
The correlation between LNG and FLKR shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LNG vs. FLKR — Risk / Return Rank
LNG
FLKR
LNG vs. FLKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LNG | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.36 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.54 | 3.46 | -2.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.00 | 12.27 | -11.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LNG vs. FLKR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LNG drawdown since its inception was -97.84%, which is greater than FLKR's maximum drawdown of -50.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNG and FLKR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LNG | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.84% | -50.06% | -47.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.09% | -34.17% | +10.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.87% | -34.17% | +9.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.87% | -47.97% | +23.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.53% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.02% | -28.42% | +17.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.02% | -21.96% | -21.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.86% | 9.61% | +3.25% |
Volatility
LNG vs. FLKR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) is 9.48%, while Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) has a volatility of 21.39%. This indicates that LNG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLKR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LNG | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.48% | 21.39% | -11.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.32% | 50.33% | -27.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.45% | 53.42% | -26.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.42% | 32.16% | -1.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.28% | 29.79% | +2.49% |
Dividends
LNG vs. FLKR - Dividend Comparison
LNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than FLKR's 2.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF | 2.86% | 3.87% | 7.08% | 2.28% | 3.13% | 2.12% | 0.99% | 2.09% | 1.86% | 1.02% |
LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc. | 0.82% | 1.06% | 0.84% | 0.95% | 0.92% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LNG and FLKR have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLKR has higher volatility (21.39%) compared to LNG (9.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LNG dropped -97.84% vs FLKR's -50.06%.
FLKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LNG and FLKR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer