LNG vs. BAESY
LNG (Cheniere Energy, Inc.) and BAESY (BAE Systems PLC) are both stocks. LNG operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy), while BAESY operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, LNG returned 22.78%/yr vs 18.72%/yr for BAESY. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LNG vs. BAESY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LNG achieves a 24.74% return, which is significantly higher than BAESY's 11.25% return. Over the past 10 years, LNG has outperformed BAESY with an annualized return of 22.78%, while BAESY has yielded a comparatively lower 18.72% annualized return.
LNG
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 0.79%
- YTD
- 24.74%
- 6M
- 28.05%
- 1Y
- 3.66%
- 3Y*
- 19.57%
- 5Y*
- 23.34%
- 10Y*
- 22.78%
BAESY
- 1D
- -4.00%
- 1M
- -1.83%
- YTD
- 11.25%
- 6M
- 13.51%
- 1Y
- 0.44%
- 3Y*
- 30.63%
- 5Y*
- 30.61%
- 10Y*
- 18.72%
LNG vs. BAESY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc. | 24.74% | -8.70% | 27.18% | 15.02% | 49.30% | 69.48% | -1.70% | 3.18% | 9.94% | 29.95% |
BAESY BAE Systems PLC | 11.25% | 65.51% | 1.23% | 40.91% | 46.40% | 14.56% | -3.43% | 34.69% | -22.16% | 13.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between LNG and BAESY is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2007 | 0.21 |
The correlation between LNG and BAESY shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LNG:
$50.79B
BAESY:
$77.52B
LNG:
$6.80
BAESY:
£5.29
LNG:
35.48
BAESY:
14.41
LNG:
0.19
BAESY:
2.65
LNG:
2.58
BAESY:
1.06
LNG:
13.53
BAESY:
4.92
LNG:
$20.28B
BAESY:
£54.56B
LNG:
$5.52B
BAESY:
£19.72B
LNG:
$5.81B
BAESY:
£7.74B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LNG vs. BAESY — Risk / Return Rank
LNG
BAESY
LNG vs. BAESY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) and BAE Systems PLC (BAESY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LNG | BAESY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.03 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.15 | 0.02 | +0.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.31 | 0.04 | +0.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LNG vs. BAESY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LNG drawdown since its inception was -97.84%, which is greater than BAESY's maximum drawdown of -59.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNG and BAESY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LNG | BAESY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.84% | -59.20% | -38.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.09% | -23.59% | -0.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.87% | -23.59% | -1.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.87% | -23.59% | -1.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.53% | -42.13% | -15.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.55% | -16.92% | -1.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.14% | -19.32% | -23.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.88% | 10.17% | +1.71% |
Volatility
LNG vs. BAESY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) is 7.19%, while BAE Systems PLC (BAESY) has a volatility of 10.68%. This indicates that LNG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BAESY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LNG | BAESY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.19% | 10.68% | -3.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.49% | 25.10% | -3.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.02% | 31.92% | -4.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.27% | 28.12% | +2.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.50% | 27.90% | +4.60% |
Dividends
LNG vs. BAESY - Dividend Comparison
LNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than BAESY's 1.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAESY BAE Systems PLC | 1.90% | 1.90% | 2.79% | 2.40% | 3.09% | 4.46% | 7.05% | 3.66% | 4.93% | 5.71% | 6.26% | 4.38% |
LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc. | 0.90% | 1.06% | 0.84% | 0.95% | 0.92% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
LNG vs. BAESY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cheniere Energy, Inc. and BAE Systems PLC. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LNG vs. BAESY - Profitability Comparison
LNG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 5.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
BAESY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BAE Systems PLC reported a gross profit of 1.34B and revenue of 14.67B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.2%.
LNG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of -3.49B and revenue of 5.87B, resulting in an operating margin of -59.4%.
BAESY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BAE Systems PLC reported an operating income of 1.34B and revenue of 14.67B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.2%.
LNG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a net income of -3.50B and revenue of 5.87B, resulting in a net margin of -59.7%.
BAESY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BAE Systems PLC reported a net income of 1.09B and revenue of 14.67B, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LNG and BAESY have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BAESY has higher volatility (10.68%) compared to LNG (7.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LNG dropped -97.84% vs BAESY's -59.20%.
LNG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.14 vs 0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LNG and BAESY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer