PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BAESY vs. GD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BAESY vs. GD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BAE Systems PLC (BAESY) and General Dynamics Corporation (GD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAESY achieves a 17.25% return, which is significantly higher than GD's 14.65% return. Over the past 10 years, BAESY has outperformed GD with an annualized return of 18.68%, while GD has yielded a comparatively lower 12.41% annualized return.


BAESY

1D
0.07%
1M
12.16%
6M
-2.22%
YTD
17.25%
1Y
11.55%
3Y*
33.26%
5Y*
30.57%
10Y*
18.68%
ALL TIME*
10.59%

GD

1D
-3.11%
1M
9.93%
6M
7.78%
YTD
14.65%
1Y
23.19%
3Y*
22.00%
5Y*
16.63%
10Y*
12.41%
ALL TIME*
15.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$30.47M$27.34M$30.55M
$482.58M$442.51M$444.60M

BAESY vs. GD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BAESY
BAE Systems PLC
17.25%65.51%1.23%40.91%46.40%14.56%-3.43%34.69%-22.16%13.28%
GD
General Dynamics Corporation
14.65%30.39%3.52%7.13%21.69%43.77%-13.14%14.80%-21.34%19.85%

Correlation

The correlation between BAESY and GD is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2007

0.39

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BAESY:

$78.93B

GD:

$103.02B

EPS

BAESY:

£5.29

GD:

$16.41

PE Ratio

BAESY:

15.33

GD:

23.21

PEG Ratio

BAESY:

2.82

GD:

2.93

PS Ratio

BAESY:

1.13

GD:

1.90

PB Ratio

BAESY:

5.23

GD:

3.89

Total Revenue (TTM)

BAESY:

£54.56B

GD:

$54.86B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BAESY:

£19.72B

GD:

$8.44B

EBITDA (TTM)

BAESY:

£7.74B

GD:

$5.97B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BAESY vs. GD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAESY
BAESY Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
BAESY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAESY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAESY Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
BAESY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAESY Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

GD
GD Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
GD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
GD Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
GD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
GD Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAESY vs. GD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BAE Systems PLC (BAESY) and General Dynamics Corporation (GD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BAESYGDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.20

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.49

1.60

-1.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.99

5.38

-4.39

BAESY vs. GD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAESY Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is lower than the GD Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAESY and GD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BAESY vs. GD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAESY drawdown since its inception was -59.20%, smaller than the maximum GD drawdown of -75.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAESY and GD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BAESYGDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.20%

-75.67%

+16.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.59%

-14.53%

-9.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.59%

-22.55%

-1.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.59%

-22.55%

-1.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.13%

-51.63%

+9.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.44%

-3.11%

-9.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.32%

-15.57%

-3.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.66%

4.32%

+7.34%

Volatility

BAESY vs. GD - Volatility Comparison

BAE Systems PLC (BAESY) has a higher volatility of 9.70% compared to General Dynamics Corporation (GD) at 6.59%. This indicates that BAESY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BAESYGDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.70%

6.59%

+3.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.89%

18.03%

+6.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.39%

21.83%

+10.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.46%

20.66%

+7.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.60%

22.82%

+4.78%

Dividends

BAESY vs. GD - Dividend Comparison

BAESY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, more than GD's 1.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BAESY
BAE Systems PLC
1.80%1.90%2.79%2.40%3.09%4.46%7.05%3.66%4.93%5.71%6.26%4.38%
GD
General Dynamics Corporation
1.62%1.76%2.12%2.01%2.00%2.24%2.90%2.26%2.31%1.61%1.72%1.96%

Financials

BAESY vs. GD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BAE Systems PLC and General Dynamics Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

BAESY vs. GD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between BAE Systems PLC and General Dynamics Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

BAESY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, BAE Systems PLC reported a gross profit of 1.34B and revenue of 14.67B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.2%.

GD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, General Dynamics Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.18B and revenue of 14.09B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.5%.

BAESY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, BAE Systems PLC reported an operating income of 1.34B and revenue of 14.67B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.2%.

GD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, General Dynamics Corporation reported an operating income of 1.46B and revenue of 14.09B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.4%.

BAESY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, BAE Systems PLC reported a net income of 1.09B and revenue of 14.67B, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.

GD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, General Dynamics Corporation reported a net income of 1.16B and revenue of 14.09B, resulting in a net margin of 8.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BAESY and GD have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BAESY has higher volatility (9.70%) compared to GD (6.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAESY dropped -59.20% vs GD's -75.67%.

GD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BAESY and GD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer