PortfoliosLab logo
BAESY vs. LMT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between BAESY and LMT is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

BAESY vs. LMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BAE Systems PLC (BAESY) and Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BAESY:

1.19

LMT:

0.15

Sortino Ratio

BAESY:

1.98

LMT:

0.31

Omega Ratio

BAESY:

1.26

LMT:

1.05

Calmar Ratio

BAESY:

2.07

LMT:

0.09

Martin Ratio

BAESY:

4.66

LMT:

0.18

Ulcer Index

BAESY:

9.11%

LMT:

16.13%

Daily Std Dev

BAESY:

34.20%

LMT:

23.45%

Max Drawdown

BAESY:

-54.58%

LMT:

-70.23%

Current Drawdown

BAESY:

-2.58%

LMT:

-22.76%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BAESY:

$69.66B

LMT:

$109.73B

EPS

BAESY:

$3.40

LMT:

$23.21

PE Ratio

BAESY:

27.92

LMT:

20.18

PEG Ratio

BAESY:

4.78

LMT:

1.69

PS Ratio

BAESY:

2.65

LMT:

1.53

PB Ratio

BAESY:

4.52

LMT:

16.31

Total Revenue (TTM)

BAESY:

$12.48B

LMT:

$71.81B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BAESY:

$1.10B

LMT:

$7.35B

EBITDA (TTM)

BAESY:

$1.77B

LMT:

$9.08B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAESY achieves a 66.89% return, which is significantly higher than LMT's -2.91% return. Over the past 10 years, BAESY has outperformed LMT with an annualized return of 16.11%, while LMT has yielded a comparatively lower 12.26% annualized return.


BAESY

YTD

66.89%

1M

5.74%

6M

47.69%

1Y

40.22%

5Y*

36.35%

10Y*

16.11%

LMT

YTD

-2.91%

1M

0.91%

6M

-11.24%

1Y

3.09%

5Y*

7.28%

10Y*

12.26%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BAESY vs. LMT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAESY
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BAESY is 8787
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BAESY is 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BAESY is 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BAESY is 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BAESY is 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BAESY is 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

LMT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LMT is 5151
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LMT is 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LMT is 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LMT is 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LMT is 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LMT is 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BAESY vs. LMT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BAE Systems PLC (BAESY) and Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current BAESY Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is higher than the LMT Sharpe Ratio of 0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAESY and LMT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

BAESY vs. LMT - Dividend Comparison

BAESY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, less than LMT's 2.75% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
BAESY
BAE Systems PLC
1.80%2.77%2.45%3.16%4.45%7.23%3.75%5.11%3.49%3.94%4.36%4.62%
LMT
Lockheed Martin Corporation
2.75%2.62%2.68%2.34%2.98%2.76%2.31%3.13%2.32%2.71%2.83%2.85%

Drawdowns

BAESY vs. LMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAESY drawdown since its inception was -54.58%, smaller than the maximum LMT drawdown of -70.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAESY and LMT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

BAESY vs. LMT - Volatility Comparison

BAE Systems PLC (BAESY) has a higher volatility of 9.63% compared to Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) at 6.85%. This indicates that BAESY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

BAESY vs. LMT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BAE Systems PLC and Lockheed Martin Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


5.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20212022202320242025
12.48B
17.96B
(BAESY) Total Revenue
(LMT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items