PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LNG vs. AJG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LNG vs. AJG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) and Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (AJG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LNG achieves a 22.32% return, which is significantly higher than AJG's -17.35% return. Over the past 10 years, LNG has outperformed AJG with an annualized return of 21.91%, while AJG has yielded a comparatively lower 17.92% annualized return.


LNG

1D
-0.93%
1M
-1.23%
YTD
22.32%
6M
18.42%
1Y
-1.71%
3Y*
18.32%
5Y*
22.98%
10Y*
21.91%

AJG

1D
-1.67%
1M
7.22%
YTD
-17.35%
6M
-10.08%
1Y
-34.63%
3Y*
1.87%
5Y*
9.17%
10Y*
17.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LNG vs. AJG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LNG
Cheniere Energy, Inc.
22.32%-8.70%27.18%15.02%49.30%69.48%-1.70%3.18%9.94%29.95%
AJG
Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.
-17.35%-8.03%27.34%20.51%12.44%39.02%32.12%31.79%19.19%25.04%

Correlation

The correlation between LNG and AJG is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 14, 1997

0.19

Fundamentals

EPS

LNG:

$6.80

AJG:

$5.74

PE Ratio

LNG:

34.79

AJG:

37.04

PEG Ratio

LNG:

0.19

AJG:

3.84

PS Ratio

LNG:

2.53

AJG:

3.97

Total Revenue (TTM)

LNG:

$20.28B

AJG:

$13.94B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LNG:

$5.52B

AJG:

$7.63B

EBITDA (TTM)

LNG:

$5.81B

AJG:

$3.66B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LNG vs. AJG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LNG
LNG Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
LNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
LNG Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
LNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
LNG Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

AJG
AJG Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
AJG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AJG Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
AJG Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
AJG Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
AJG Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LNG vs. AJG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) and Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (AJG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LNGAJGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

0.78

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.07

-0.85

+0.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.15

-1.47

+1.33

LNG vs. AJG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LNG Sharpe Ratio is -0.06, which is higher than the AJG Sharpe Ratio of -1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LNG and AJG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LNGAJGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

-1.25

+1.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.40

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

0.78

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.47

-0.31

Drawdowns

LNG vs. AJG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LNG drawdown since its inception was -97.84%, which is greater than AJG's maximum drawdown of -57.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNG and AJG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LNGAJGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.84%

-57.49%

-40.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.09%

-40.64%

+16.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.87%

-44.40%

+19.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.87%

-44.40%

+19.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.53%

-44.40%

-13.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.12%

-38.26%

+18.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.16%

-12.83%

-30.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.67%

24.06%

-12.39%

Volatility

LNG vs. AJG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) is 7.91%, while Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (AJG) has a volatility of 8.97%. This indicates that LNG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AJG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LNGAJGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.91%

8.97%

-1.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.87%

22.42%

-0.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.75%

27.95%

-0.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.28%

22.96%

+7.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.59%

23.08%

+9.51%

Dividends

LNG vs. AJG - Dividend Comparison

LNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, less than AJG's 1.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AJG
Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.
1.27%1.00%0.85%0.98%1.08%1.13%1.46%1.81%2.23%2.47%2.93%3.62%
LNG
Cheniere Energy, Inc.
0.92%1.06%0.84%0.95%0.92%0.33%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

LNG vs. AJG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cheniere Energy, Inc. and Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B20222023202420252026
5.87B
3.63B
(LNG) Total Revenue
(AJG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LNG vs. AJG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cheniere Energy, Inc. and Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%202220232024202520260
39.1%
Portfolio components
LNG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 5.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

AJG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. reported a gross profit of 1.42B and revenue of 3.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.1%.

LNG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of -3.49B and revenue of 5.87B, resulting in an operating margin of -59.4%.

AJG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. reported an operating income of 341.00M and revenue of 3.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.4%.

LNG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a net income of -3.50B and revenue of 5.87B, resulting in a net margin of -59.7%.

AJG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. reported a net income of 151.00M and revenue of 3.63B, resulting in a net margin of 4.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LNG and AJG have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AJG has higher volatility (8.97%) compared to LNG (7.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LNG dropped -97.84% vs AJG's -57.49%.

LNG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.06 vs -1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LNG and AJG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer