PortfoliosLab logo
AJG vs. WHF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

AJG vs. WHF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (AJG) and WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. (WHF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

AJG:

0.92

WHF:

-0.62

Sortino Ratio

AJG:

1.36

WHF:

-0.77

Omega Ratio

AJG:

1.18

WHF:

0.90

Calmar Ratio

AJG:

1.76

WHF:

-0.59

Martin Ratio

AJG:

4.28

WHF:

-1.18

Ulcer Index

AJG:

5.05%

WHF:

11.70%

Daily Std Dev

AJG:

22.36%

WHF:

21.10%

Max Drawdown

AJG:

-53.86%

WHF:

-57.48%

Current Drawdown

AJG:

-9.20%

WHF:

-16.71%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AJG:

$81.45B

WHF:

$212.21M

EPS

AJG:

$6.49

WHF:

$0.39

PE Ratio

AJG:

49.01

WHF:

23.41

PEG Ratio

AJG:

1.29

WHF:

1.01

PS Ratio

AJG:

7.24

WHF:

2.46

PB Ratio

AJG:

3.65

WHF:

0.75

Total Revenue (TTM)

AJG:

$9.25B

WHF:

$47.16M

Gross Profit (TTM)

AJG:

$5.51B

WHF:

$36.43M

EBITDA (TTM)

AJG:

$2.72B

WHF:

$22.95M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AJG achieves a 11.79% return, which is significantly higher than WHF's 1.13% return. Over the past 10 years, AJG has outperformed WHF with an annualized return of 23.09%, while WHF has yielded a comparatively lower 9.55% annualized return.


AJG

YTD
11.79%
1M
-3.86%
6M
14.79%
1Y
20.37%
3Y*
24.93%
5Y*
27.73%
10Y*
23.09%

WHF

YTD
1.13%
1M
4.57%
6M
-0.21%
1Y
-13.06%
3Y*
-0.17%
5Y*
10.74%
10Y*
9.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.

WhiteHorse Finance, Inc.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

AJG vs. WHF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AJG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AJG is 7676
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AJG is 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AJG is 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AJG is 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AJG is 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AJG is 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

WHF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of WHF is 1212
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of WHF is 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of WHF is 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of WHF is 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of WHF is 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of WHF is 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

AJG vs. WHF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (AJG) and WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. (WHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current AJG Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is higher than the WHF Sharpe Ratio of -0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AJG and WHF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Correlation

The correlation between AJG and WHF is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

AJG vs. WHF - Dividend Comparison

AJG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, less than WHF's 19.75% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
AJG
Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.
0.79%0.85%0.98%1.08%1.13%1.46%1.81%2.23%2.47%2.93%3.62%3.06%
WHF
WhiteHorse Finance, Inc.
19.75%18.44%12.60%11.26%10.03%11.35%11.79%11.16%13.23%11.67%12.37%12.29%

Drawdowns

AJG vs. WHF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AJG drawdown since its inception was -53.86%, smaller than the maximum WHF drawdown of -57.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AJG and WHF.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

AJG vs. WHF - Volatility Comparison

Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (AJG) has a higher volatility of 6.22% compared to WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. (WHF) at 5.89%. This indicates that AJG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WHF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

AJG vs. WHF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. and WhiteHorse Finance, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00BJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025
3.73B
18.80M
(AJG) Total Revenue
(WHF) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AJG vs. WHF - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. and WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%JulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025
86.8%
42.9%
(AJG) Gross Margin
(WHF) Gross Margin
AJG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2025, Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. reported a gross profit of 3.24B and revenue of 3.73B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.8%.

WHF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2025, WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. reported a gross profit of 8.07M and revenue of 18.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.9%.

AJG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2025, Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. reported an operating income of 1.34B and revenue of 3.73B, resulting in an operating margin of 35.9%.

WHF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2025, WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. reported an operating income of 6.95M and revenue of 18.80M, resulting in an operating margin of 37.0%.

AJG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2025, Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. reported a net income of 704.40M and revenue of 3.73B, resulting in a net margin of 18.9%.

WHF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2025, WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. reported a net income of 6.95M and revenue of 18.80M, resulting in a net margin of 37.0%.