LMB vs. GDXU
LMB (Limbach Holdings, Inc.) is a stock, while GDXU (MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040) is Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S-Network MicroSectors Gold Miners Index. Over the past 5 years, LMB returned 52.40%/yr vs -14.73%/yr for GDXU. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LMB vs. GDXU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LMB achieves a 1.59% return, which is significantly higher than GDXU's -56.00% return.
LMB
- 1D
- -2.80%
- 1M
- 10.25%
- YTD
- 1.59%
- 6M
- 4.13%
- 1Y
- -44.24%
- 3Y*
- 50.98%
- 5Y*
- 52.40%
- 10Y*
- 22.55%
GDXU
- 1D
- 8.84%
- 1M
- -50.11%
- YTD
- -56.00%
- 6M
- -55.92%
- 1Y
- 30.95%
- 3Y*
- 37.87%
- 5Y*
- -14.73%
- 10Y*
- —
LMB vs. GDXU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LMB Limbach Holdings, Inc. | 1.59% | -8.99% | 88.12% | 336.79% | 15.67% | -27.01% | 4.76% |
GDXU MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040 | -56.00% | 796.47% | -18.60% | -21.36% | -62.82% | -54.93% | 4.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between LMB and GDXU is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2020 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LMB vs. GDXU — Risk / Return Rank
LMB
GDXU
LMB vs. GDXU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Limbach Holdings, Inc. (LMB) and MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040 (GDXU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LMB | GDXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.18 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.79 | 0.37 | -1.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.14 | 0.80 | -1.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LMB vs. GDXU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LMB drawdown since its inception was -84.10%, smaller than the maximum GDXU drawdown of -94.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMB and GDXU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LMB | GDXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.10% | -94.39% | +10.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.92% | -83.97% | +28.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.92% | -83.97% | +28.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.92% | -92.44% | +36.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -84.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.11% | -79.58% | +32.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.63% | -69.77% | +38.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 38.98% | 38.59% | +0.39% |
Volatility
LMB vs. GDXU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Limbach Holdings, Inc. (LMB) is 18.28%, while MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040 (GDXU) has a volatility of 54.28%. This indicates that LMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDXU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LMB | GDXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.28% | 54.28% | -36.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 56.99% | 123.72% | -66.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 66.31% | 142.00% | -75.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.70% | 111.92% | -49.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 63.28% | 110.82% | -47.54% |
Dividends
LMB vs. GDXU - Dividend Comparison
Neither LMB nor GDXU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LMB and GDXU have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDXU has higher volatility (54.28%) compared to LMB (18.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LMB dropped -84.10% vs GDXU's -94.39%.
GDXU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.22 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LMB and GDXU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer