PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GDXU vs. XAUUSD=X
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GDXU vs. XAUUSD=X - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN (GDXU) and Gold Spot Price US Dollar (XAUUSD=X). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDXU achieves a -57.24% return, which is significantly lower than XAUUSD=X's 0.12% return.


GDXU

1D
-26.76%
1M
-45.48%
YTD
-57.24%
6M
-49.69%
1Y
27.82%
3Y*
32.66%
5Y*
-15.65%
10Y*

XAUUSD=X

1D
-3.29%
1M
-7.74%
YTD
0.12%
6M
3.08%
1Y
29.08%
3Y*
30.14%
5Y*
18.01%
10Y*
13.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDXU vs. XAUUSD=X - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GDXU
MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN
-57.24%796.47%-18.60%-21.36%-62.82%-54.93%4.66%
XAUUSD=X
Gold Spot Price US Dollar
0.12%64.75%27.24%13.14%-0.25%-3.50%2.87%

Correlation

The correlation between GDXU and XAUUSD=X is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2020

0.76

The correlation between GDXU and XAUUSD=X has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GDXU vs. XAUUSD=X — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDXU
GDXU Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
GDXU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDXU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDXU Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
GDXU Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDXU Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

XAUUSD=X
XAUUSD=X Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
XAUUSD=X Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XAUUSD=X Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
XAUUSD=X Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
XAUUSD=X Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
XAUUSD=X Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDXU vs. XAUUSD=X - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN (GDXU) and Gold Spot Price US Dollar (XAUUSD=X). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GDXUXAUUSD=XDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.21

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.35

1.14

-0.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.76

2.87

-2.12

GDXU vs. XAUUSD=X - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GDXU Sharpe Ratio is 0.20, which is lower than the XAUUSD=X Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GDXU and XAUUSD=X, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GDXUXAUUSD=XDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

1.00

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.14

0.97

-1.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.13

0.58

-0.71

Drawdowns

GDXU vs. XAUUSD=X - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDXU drawdown since its inception was -94.39%, which is greater than XAUUSD=X's maximum drawdown of -44.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXU and XAUUSD=X.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GDXUXAUUSD=XDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.39%

-44.69%

-49.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-80.15%

-20.13%

-60.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-80.15%

-20.13%

-60.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-92.93%

-20.81%

-72.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-80.15%

-20.13%

-60.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-69.78%

-16.42%

-53.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

36.86%

8.77%

+28.09%

Volatility

GDXU vs. XAUUSD=X - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN (GDXU) has a higher volatility of 50.45% compared to Gold Spot Price US Dollar (XAUUSD=X) at 5.61%. This indicates that GDXU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XAUUSD=X based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GDXUXAUUSD=XDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

50.45%

5.61%

+44.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

122.04%

21.67%

+100.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

140.24%

22.90%

+117.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

111.46%

16.58%

+94.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

110.56%

15.11%

+95.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


GDXU and XAUUSD=X have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GDXU has higher volatility (50.45%) compared to XAUUSD=X (5.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDXU dropped -94.39% vs XAUUSD=X's -44.69%.

XAUUSD=X currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.00 vs 0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GDXU and XAUUSD=X

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer