PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GDXU vs. XAUUSD=X
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GDXU vs. XAUUSD=X - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040 (GDXU) and Gold Spot Price US Dollar (XAUUSD=X). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDXU achieves a -64.44% return, which is significantly lower than XAUUSD=X's -6.92% return.


GDXU

1D
4.85%
1M
-45.28%
YTD
-64.44%
6M
-69.38%
1Y
19.80%
3Y*
32.85%
5Y*
-12.23%
10Y*

XAUUSD=X

1D
0.60%
1M
-10.74%
YTD
-6.92%
6M
-10.77%
1Y
20.75%
3Y*
27.90%
5Y*
17.70%
10Y*
11.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDXU vs. XAUUSD=X - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GDXU
MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040
-64.44%796.47%-18.60%-21.36%-62.82%-54.93%4.32%
XAUUSD=X
Gold Spot Price US Dollar
-6.92%64.75%27.24%13.14%-0.25%-3.50%3.44%

Correlation

The correlation between GDXU and XAUUSD=X is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2020

0.76

The correlation between GDXU and XAUUSD=X has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GDXU vs. XAUUSD=X — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDXU
GDXU Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
GDXU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDXU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDXU Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
GDXU Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDXU Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

XAUUSD=X
XAUUSD=X Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
XAUUSD=X Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XAUUSD=X Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
XAUUSD=X Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
XAUUSD=X Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
XAUUSD=X Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDXU vs. XAUUSD=X - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040 (GDXU) and Gold Spot Price US Dollar (XAUUSD=X). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GDXUXAUUSD=XDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.15

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.24

0.63

-0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.49

1.73

-1.25

GDXU vs. XAUUSD=X - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GDXU Sharpe Ratio is 0.14, which is lower than the XAUUSD=X Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GDXU and XAUUSD=X, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GDXU vs. XAUUSD=X - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDXU drawdown since its inception was -94.39%, which is greater than XAUUSD=X's maximum drawdown of -44.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXU and XAUUSD=X.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GDXUXAUUSD=XDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.39%

-44.69%

-49.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-84.26%

-26.19%

-58.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-84.26%

-26.19%

-58.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-91.30%

-26.19%

-65.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-83.50%

-25.74%

-57.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-69.82%

-16.49%

-53.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

40.80%

10.53%

+30.27%

Volatility

GDXU vs. XAUUSD=X - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040 (GDXU) has a higher volatility of 54.90% compared to Gold Spot Price US Dollar (XAUUSD=X) at 8.40%. This indicates that GDXU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XAUUSD=X based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GDXUXAUUSD=XDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

54.90%

8.40%

+46.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

126.32%

21.67%

+104.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

144.77%

23.76%

+121.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

112.57%

16.81%

+95.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

111.32%

15.18%

+96.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


GDXU and XAUUSD=X have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GDXU has higher volatility (54.90%) compared to XAUUSD=X (8.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDXU dropped -94.39% vs XAUUSD=X's -44.69%.

XAUUSD=X currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.69 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GDXU and XAUUSD=X

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer