PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GDXU vs. GDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GDXU vs. GDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN (GDXU) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDXU achieves a -37.13% return, which is significantly lower than GDX's 2.66% return.


GDXU

1D
3.73%
1M
-5.99%
YTD
-37.13%
6M
-27.31%
1Y
85.47%
3Y*
52.20%
5Y*
-8.12%
10Y*

GDX

1D
1.58%
1M
1.08%
YTD
2.66%
6M
8.67%
1Y
64.94%
3Y*
42.66%
5Y*
19.85%
10Y*
14.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDXU vs. GDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GDXU
MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN
-37.13%796.47%-18.60%-21.36%-62.82%-54.93%4.66%
GDX
VanEck Gold Miners ETF
2.66%154.77%10.63%9.98%-9.01%-9.52%1.97%

Correlation

The correlation between GDXU and GDX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2020

0.99

The correlation between GDXU and GDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

GDXU vs. GDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GDXU
GDX

Basic Materials

100.0%
100.0%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Basic Materials

GDXU
100.0%
GDX
100.0%

Communication Services

GDXU

-

GDX

-

Consumer Cyclical

GDXU

-

GDX

-

Consumer Defensive

GDXU

-

GDX

-

Energy

GDXU

-

GDX

-

Financial Services

GDXU

-

GDX

-

Healthcare

GDXU

-

GDX

-

Industrials

GDXU

-

GDX

-

Real Estate

GDXU

-

GDX

-

Technology

GDXU

-

GDX

-

Utilities

GDXU

-

GDX

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GDXU vs. GDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDXU
GDXU Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
GDXU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDXU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDXU Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
GDXU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDXU Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

GDX
GDX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
GDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
GDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDXU vs. GDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN (GDXU) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GDXUGDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.63

1.44

-0.81

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.61

1.84

-0.23

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.26

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.62

2.44

-0.81

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.34

6.32

-2.99

GDXU vs. GDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GDXU Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is lower than the GDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GDXU and GDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GDXUGDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

1.44

-0.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.07

0.55

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.07

0.13

-0.20

Drawdowns

GDXU vs. GDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDXU drawdown since its inception was -94.39%, which is greater than GDX's maximum drawdown of -80.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXU and GDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GDXUGDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.39%

-80.34%

-14.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-73.99%

-30.84%

-43.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-73.99%

-30.84%

-43.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-92.93%

-46.51%

-46.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-70.82%

-23.99%

-46.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-69.76%

-40.44%

-29.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

35.93%

11.87%

+24.06%

Volatility

GDXU vs. GDX - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN (GDXU) has a higher volatility of 45.40% compared to VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) at 15.07%. This indicates that GDXU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GDXUGDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

45.40%

15.07%

+30.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

117.57%

37.34%

+80.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

138.28%

45.72%

+92.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

110.85%

36.39%

+74.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

109.97%

37.17%

+72.80%

GDXU vs. GDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDXU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than GDX's 0.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

GDXU vs. GDX - Dividend Comparison

GDXU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GDX
VanEck Gold Miners ETF
0.72%0.74%1.19%1.61%1.66%1.67%0.53%0.67%0.50%0.76%0.26%0.85%
GDXU
MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, GDXU and GDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GDXU has higher volatility (45.40%) compared to GDX (15.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDXU dropped -94.39% vs GDX's -80.34%.

On 5-year performance, GDX leads with 19.85% vs -8.12% for GDXU. On fees, GDX is cheaper at 0.51% per year. On volatility, GDX has been the lower-risk option at 15.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GDX has performed better with a 19.85% return vs -8.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GDX is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for GDXU.

GDX has the higher dividend yield at 0.72%, compared with 0.00% for GDXU.

GDXU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while GDX is Gold. GDXU tracks S-Network MicroSectors Gold Miners Index, while GDX tracks NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index. They also come from different issuers: BMO and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for GDXU and 0.51% for GDX.

GDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GDXU and GDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer