LIF vs. APH
LIF (Life360, Inc.) and APH (Amphenol Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — LIF in Software - Application, APH in Electronic Components. Over the past year, LIF returned -25.93% vs 67.47% for APH. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LIF vs. APH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LIF achieves a -29.45% return, which is significantly lower than APH's 14.03% return.
LIF
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 17.44%
- YTD
- -29.45%
- 6M
- -33.03%
- 1Y
- -25.93%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
APH
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- 23.04%
- YTD
- 14.03%
- 6M
- 19.47%
- 1Y
- 67.47%
- 3Y*
- 57.45%
- 5Y*
- 36.37%
- 10Y*
- 27.74%
LIF vs. APH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
LIF Life360, Inc. | -29.45% | 55.42% | 58.73% |
APH Amphenol Corporation | 14.03% | 96.08% | 4.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between LIF and APH is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2024 | 0.30 |
The correlation between LIF and APH shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LIF:
$3.88B
APH:
$198.36B
LIF:
$1.75
APH:
$4.58
LIF:
25.86
APH:
33.54
LIF:
7.30
APH:
7.62
LIF:
6.49
APH:
14.19
LIF:
$528.98M
APH:
$25.90B
LIF:
$407.86M
APH:
$9.67B
LIF:
$26.53M
APH:
$7.45B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LIF vs. APH — Risk / Return Rank
LIF
APH
LIF vs. APH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Life360, Inc. (LIF) and Amphenol Corporation (APH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LIF | APH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.28 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.43 | 2.27 | -2.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.70 | 5.85 | -6.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LIF vs. APH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LIF drawdown since its inception was -65.64%, roughly equal to the maximum APH drawdown of -63.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIF and APH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LIF | APH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.64% | -63.41% | -2.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -65.64% | -28.19% | -37.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -28.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.73% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -59.19% | -7.31% | -51.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.35% | -13.56% | -7.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 40.82% | 10.92% | +29.90% |
Volatility
LIF vs. APH - Volatility Comparison
Life360, Inc. (LIF) has a higher volatility of 16.67% compared to Amphenol Corporation (APH) at 15.50%. This indicates that LIF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LIF | APH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.67% | 15.50% | +1.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 52.85% | 37.39% | +15.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.08% | 41.68% | +25.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.97% | 30.75% | +32.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.97% | 27.93% | +35.04% |
Dividends
LIF vs. APH - Dividend Comparison
LIF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while APH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APH Amphenol Corporation | 0.54% | 0.55% | 0.79% | 1.07% | 1.06% | 0.89% | 0.80% | 0.89% | 1.09% | 0.80% | 0.86% | 1.01% |
LIF Life360, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
LIF vs. APH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Life360, Inc. and Amphenol Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LIF vs. APH - Profitability Comparison
LIF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Life360, Inc. reported a gross profit of 110.56M and revenue of 143.12M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 77.3%.
APH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amphenol Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.80B and revenue of 7.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.
LIF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Life360, Inc. reported an operating income of -8.08M and revenue of 143.12M, resulting in an operating margin of -5.6%.
APH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amphenol Corporation reported an operating income of 1.83B and revenue of 7.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.0%.
LIF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Life360, Inc. reported a net income of 2.78M and revenue of 143.12M, resulting in a net margin of 1.9%.
APH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amphenol Corporation reported a net income of 2.35B and revenue of 7.62B, resulting in a net margin of 30.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LIF and APH have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LIF has higher volatility (16.67%) compared to APH (15.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIF dropped -65.64% vs APH's -63.41%.
APH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LIF and APH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer