LIF vs. PLTR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LIF (Life360, Inc.) and PLTR (Palantir Technologies Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — LIF in Software - Application, PLTR in Software - Infrastructure. Over the past year, LIF returned -26.66% vs 6.78% for PLTR. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

LIF vs. PLTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Life360, Inc. (LIF) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LIF achieves a -27.95% return, which is significantly lower than PLTR's -20.00% return.

LIF

• 1D: -1.68%
• 1M: -0.15%
• YTD: -27.95%
• 6M: -38.40%
• 1Y: -26.66%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PLTR

• 1D: -6.55%
• 1M: -2.62%
• YTD: -20.00%
• 6M: -19.24%
• 1Y: 6.78%
• 3Y*: 113.95%
• 5Y*: 42.70%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LIF vs. PLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
LIF Life360, Inc.	-27.95%	55.42%	52.85%
PLTR Palantir Technologies Inc.	-20.00%	135.03%	217.91%

Correlation

The correlation between LIF and PLTR is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 7, 2024	0.39

Fundamentals

Market Cap LIF : $3.96B PLTR : $365.59B
EPS LIF : $1.75 PLTR : $0.89
PE Ratio LIF : 26.41 PLTR : 160.02
PS Ratio LIF : 7.45 PLTR : 69.88
PB Ratio LIF : 6.62 PLTR : 43.27
Total Revenue (TTM) LIF : $528.98M PLTR : $5.22B
Gross Profit (TTM) LIF : $407.86M PLTR : $4.39B
EBITDA (TTM) LIF : $26.53M PLTR : $2.01B

Return for Risk

LIF vs. PLTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LIF

LIF Risk / Return Rank: 26
LIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
LIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
LIF Omega Ratio Rank: 26
LIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
LIF Martin Ratio Rank: 29

PLTR

PLTR Risk / Return Rank: 43
PLTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
PLTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
PLTR Omega Ratio Rank: 42
PLTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
PLTR Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LIF vs. PLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Life360, Inc. (LIF) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LIF	PLTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.40	0.13	-0.53
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.18	0.53	-0.71
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	1.07	-0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.41	0.18	-0.59
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.67	0.33	-1.01
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LIF vs. PLTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LIF Sharpe Ratio is -0.40, which is lower than the PLTR Sharpe Ratio of 0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LIF and PLTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LIF	PLTR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.40	0.13	-0.53
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.66	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.50	0.88	-0.38

Drawdowns

LIF vs. PLTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LIF drawdown since its inception was -65.64%, smaller than the maximum PLTR drawdown of -84.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIF and PLTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	LIF	PLTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.64%	-84.62%	+18.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-65.64%	-38.19%	-27.45%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-40.61%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-79.14%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-58.33%	-31.36%	-26.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.88%	-40.31%	+19.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	39.65%	20.40%	+19.25%

Volatility

LIF vs. PLTR - Volatility Comparison

Life360, Inc. (LIF) has a higher volatility of 19.81% compared to Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) at 18.39%. This indicates that LIF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LIF	PLTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.81%	18.39%	+1.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	52.75%	38.32%	+14.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	66.79%	51.70%	+15.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	63.14%	65.41%	-2.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	63.14%	69.86%	-6.72%

Dividends

LIF vs. PLTR - Dividend Comparison

Neither LIF nor PLTR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

LIF vs. PLTR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Life360, Inc. and Palantir Technologies Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

LIF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Life360, Inc. reported a gross profit of 110.56M and revenue of 143.12M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 77.3%.

PLTR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palantir Technologies Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.42B and revenue of 1.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.8%.

LIF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Life360, Inc. reported an operating income of -8.08M and revenue of 143.12M, resulting in an operating margin of -5.6%.

PLTR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palantir Technologies Inc. reported an operating income of 754.00M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.2%.

LIF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Life360, Inc. reported a net income of 2.78M and revenue of 143.12M, resulting in a net margin of 1.9%.

PLTR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palantir Technologies Inc. reported a net income of 870.53M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in a net margin of 53.3%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LIF and PLTR in my portfolio?

LIF and PLTR have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LIF or PLTR?

LIF has higher volatility (19.81%) compared to PLTR (18.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIF dropped -65.64% vs PLTR's -84.62%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PLTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.13 vs -0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.