LIF vs. QQQM
LIF (Life360, Inc.) is a stock, while QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Over the past year, LIF returned -23.09% vs 43.37% for QQQM. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LIF vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LIF achieves a -26.72% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's 21.64% return.
LIF
- 1D
- -2.37%
- 1M
- 2.73%
- YTD
- -26.72%
- 6M
- -37.06%
- 1Y
- -23.09%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQM
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 10.70%
- YTD
- 21.64%
- 6M
- 20.29%
- 1Y
- 43.37%
- 3Y*
- 28.98%
- 5Y*
- 18.52%
- 10Y*
- —
LIF vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
LIF Life360, Inc. | -26.72% | 55.42% | 52.85% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 21.64% | 20.85% | 10.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between LIF and QQQM is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 7, 2024 | 0.49 |
The correlation between LIF and QQQM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LIF vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank
LIF
QQQM
LIF vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Life360, Inc. (LIF) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LIF | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.35 | 2.74 | -3.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.08 | 3.56 | -3.64 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.47 | -0.48 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.40 | 3.72 | -4.12 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.66 | 14.29 | -14.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LIF | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.35 | 2.74 | -3.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.85 | -0.34 |
Drawdowns
LIF vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LIF drawdown since its inception was -65.64%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIF and QQQM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LIF | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.64% | -35.04% | -30.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -65.64% | -11.96% | -53.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -57.62% | 0.00% | -57.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.80% | -8.26% | -12.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 39.48% | 3.11% | +36.37% |
Volatility
LIF vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison
Life360, Inc. (LIF) has a higher volatility of 19.76% compared to Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) at 4.47%. This indicates that LIF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LIF | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.76% | 4.47% | +15.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 52.96% | 12.06% | +40.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 66.88% | 15.92% | +50.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.19% | 22.24% | +40.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 63.19% | 22.13% | +41.06% |
Dividends
LIF vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison
LIF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LIF Life360, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 0.41% | 0.50% | 0.61% | 0.65% | 0.83% | 0.40% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LIF and QQQM have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LIF has higher volatility (19.76%) compared to QQQM (4.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIF dropped -65.64% vs QQQM's -35.04%.
QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs -0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LIF and QQQM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer