LIF vs. QQQM
LIF (Life360, Inc.) is a stock, while QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Over the past year, LIF returned -26.66% vs 41.98% for QQQM. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LIF vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LIF achieves a -27.95% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's 21.39% return.
LIF
- 1D
- -1.68%
- 1M
- -0.15%
- YTD
- -27.95%
- 6M
- -38.40%
- 1Y
- -26.66%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQM
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 10.67%
- YTD
- 21.39%
- 6M
- 19.75%
- 1Y
- 41.98%
- 3Y*
- 28.89%
- 5Y*
- 18.07%
- 10Y*
- —
LIF vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
LIF Life360, Inc. | -27.95% | 55.42% | 52.85% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 21.39% | 20.85% | 10.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between LIF and QQQM is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 7, 2024 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LIF vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank
LIF
QQQM
LIF vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Life360, Inc. (LIF) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LIF | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.40 | 2.65 | -3.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.18 | 3.46 | -3.64 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.45 | -0.48 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.41 | 3.53 | -3.93 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.67 | 13.52 | -14.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LIF | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.40 | 2.65 | -3.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.85 | -0.35 |
Drawdowns
LIF vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LIF drawdown since its inception was -65.64%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIF and QQQM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LIF | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.64% | -35.04% | -30.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -65.64% | -11.96% | -53.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -58.33% | -0.20% | -58.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.88% | -8.25% | -12.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 39.65% | 3.11% | +36.54% |
Volatility
LIF vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison
Life360, Inc. (LIF) has a higher volatility of 19.81% compared to Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) at 4.48%. This indicates that LIF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LIF | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.81% | 4.48% | +15.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 52.75% | 12.05% | +40.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 66.79% | 15.91% | +50.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.14% | 22.24% | +40.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 63.14% | 22.12% | +41.02% |
Dividends
LIF vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison
LIF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LIF Life360, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 0.41% | 0.50% | 0.61% | 0.65% | 0.83% | 0.40% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LIF and QQQM have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LIF has higher volatility (19.81%) compared to QQQM (4.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIF dropped -65.64% vs QQQM's -35.04%.
QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs -0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LIF and QQQM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer