LIF vs. PANW

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Life360, Inc. (LIF) and Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW).

Performance

LIF vs. PANW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Life360, Inc. (LIF) and Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

LIF vs. PANW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
LIF Life360, Inc.	-36.36%	55.42%	52.85%
PANW Palo Alto Networks, Inc.	-12.96%	1.23%	22.98%

Fundamentals

Market Cap LIF : $3.48B PANW : $114.31B
EPS LIF : $1.77 PANW : $1.81
PE Ratio LIF : 23.04 PANW : 88.75
PS Ratio LIF : 7.10 PANW : 11.50
PB Ratio LIF : 6.34 PANW : 12.17
Total Revenue (TTM) LIF : $489.48M PANW : $9.89B
Gross Profit (TTM) LIF : $380.84M PANW : $7.27B
EBITDA (TTM) LIF : $33.47M PANW : $2.04B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LIF achieves a -36.36% return, which is significantly lower than PANW's -12.96% return.

LIF

• 1D: 7.08%
• 1M: -22.47%
• YTD: -36.36%
• 6M: -61.60%
• 1Y: 6.33%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PANW

• 1D: 3.87%
• 1M: 7.66%
• YTD: -12.96%
• 6M: -21.27%
• 1Y: -6.05%
• 3Y*: 17.09%
• 5Y*: 24.01%
• 10Y*: 19.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

LIF vs. PANW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LIF

LIF Risk / Return Rank: 45
LIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
LIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
LIF Omega Ratio Rank: 47
LIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
LIF Martin Ratio Rank: 43

PANW

PANW Risk / Return Rank: 33
PANW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
PANW Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
PANW Omega Ratio Rank: 31
PANW Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
PANW Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LIF vs. PANW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Life360, Inc. (LIF) and Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LIF	PANW	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.09	-0.17	+0.26
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.64	0.02	+0.62
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.00	+0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.09	-0.20	+0.29
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.19	-0.51	+0.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LIF vs. PANW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LIF Sharpe Ratio is 0.09, which is higher than the PANW Sharpe Ratio of -0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LIF and PANW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LIF	PANW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.09	-0.17	+0.26
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.59	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.51	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.42	0.60	-0.19

Correlation

The correlation between LIF and PANW is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

LIF vs. PANW - Dividend Comparison

Neither LIF nor PANW has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

LIF vs. PANW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LIF drawdown since its inception was -65.62%, which is greater than PANW's maximum drawdown of -47.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIF and PANW.

Drawdown Indicators

	LIF	PANW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.62%	-47.98%	-17.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-65.62%	-36.01%	-29.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-36.01%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-47.98%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-63.19%	-27.58%	-35.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.95%	-14.71%	-2.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	30.33%	14.18%	+16.15%

Volatility

LIF vs. PANW - Volatility Comparison

Life360, Inc. (LIF) has a higher volatility of 24.94% compared to Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) at 12.66%. This indicates that LIF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PANW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LIF	PANW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	24.94%	12.66%	+12.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	53.25%	25.18%	+28.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	68.76%	36.74%	+32.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	62.14%	40.61%	+21.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	62.14%	38.47%	+23.67%

Financials

LIF vs. PANW - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Life360, Inc. and Palo Alto Networks, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

LIF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Life360, Inc. reported a gross profit of 109.66M and revenue of 145.98M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 75.1%.

PANW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.91B and revenue of 2.59B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 73.6%.

LIF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Life360, Inc. reported an operating income of 8.95M and revenue of 145.98M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.1%.

PANW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. reported an operating income of 397.00M and revenue of 2.59B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.3%.

LIF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Life360, Inc. reported a net income of 129.66M and revenue of 145.98M, resulting in a net margin of 88.8%.

PANW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. reported a net income of 432.00M and revenue of 2.59B, resulting in a net margin of 16.7%.