APH vs. PWR

In the year-to-date period, APH achieves a 43.17% return, which is significantly lower than PWR's 52.33% return. Over the past 10 years, APH has underperformed PWR with an annualized return of 19.79%, while PWR has yielded a comparatively higher 26.03% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amphenol Corporation (APH) and Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current APH Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is comparable to the PWR Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APH and PWR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

APH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, more than PWR's 0.11% yield.

The maximum APH drawdown since its inception was -63.41%, smaller than the maximum PWR drawdown of -97.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APH and PWR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Amphenol Corporation (APH) is 7.41%, while Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) has a volatility of 7.84%. This indicates that APH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PWR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Amphenol Corporation and Quanta Services, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.