APH vs. PWR
Compare and contrast key facts about Amphenol Corporation (APH) and Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: APH or PWR.
Correlation
The correlation between APH and PWR is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
APH vs. PWR - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
APH:
1.76
PWR:
2.13
APH:
2.12
PWR:
2.89
APH:
1.32
PWR:
1.38
APH:
2.75
PWR:
4.46
APH:
8.63
PWR:
13.45
APH:
5.43%
PWR:
5.12%
APH:
26.71%
PWR:
32.26%
APH:
-63.41%
PWR:
-97.07%
APH:
-7.67%
PWR:
-2.61%
Fundamentals
APH:
$84.22B
PWR:
$49.81B
APH:
$1.74
PWR:
$5.43
APH:
39.90
PWR:
62.15
APH:
2.14
PWR:
2.01
APH:
$10.90B
PWR:
$17.12B
APH:
$3.66B
PWR:
$2.26B
APH:
$2.68B
PWR:
$1.41B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, APH achieves a -0.04% return, which is significantly lower than PWR's 6.81% return. Over the past 10 years, APH has underperformed PWR with an annualized return of 18.80%, while PWR has yielded a comparatively higher 29.33% annualized return.
APH
-0.04%
-1.64%
5.31%
43.44%
22.38%
18.80%
PWR
6.81%
5.29%
30.60%
67.35%
52.78%
29.33%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
APH vs. PWR — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
APH
PWR
APH vs. PWR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amphenol Corporation (APH) and Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
APH vs. PWR - Dividend Comparison
APH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, more than PWR's 0.11% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APH Amphenol Corporation | 0.79% | 0.79% | 0.86% | 1.06% | 0.73% | 0.80% | 0.89% | 1.09% | 0.80% | 0.86% | 1.01% | 0.84% |
PWR Quanta Services, Inc. | 0.11% | 0.09% | 0.15% | 0.25% | 0.16% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
APH vs. PWR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum APH drawdown since its inception was -63.41%, smaller than the maximum PWR drawdown of -97.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APH and PWR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
APH vs. PWR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amphenol Corporation (APH) is 8.42%, while Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) has a volatility of 9.13%. This indicates that APH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PWR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
APH vs. PWR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Amphenol Corporation and Quanta Services, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities