LIF vs. GSIB
LIF (Life360, Inc.) is a stock, while GSIB (Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF) is Financials Equities fund actively managed by Themes. Over the past year, LIF returned -27.35% vs 49.09% for GSIB. Their 0.31 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
LIF vs. GSIB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LIF achieves a -15.73% return, which is significantly lower than GSIB's 22.66% return.
LIF
- 1D
- -2.93%
- 1M
- -6.34%
- 6M
- -5.66%
- YTD
- -15.73%
- 1Y
- -27.35%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 40.57%
GSIB
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 6.55%
- 6M
- 18.14%
- YTD
- 22.66%
- 1Y
- 49.09%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 45.58%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.37M | $1.31M | $753.15K | |
| $29.00M | $30.44M | $34.94M |
LIF vs. GSIB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
LIF Life360, Inc. | -15.73% | 55.42% | 58.73% |
GSIB Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF | 22.66% | 61.67% | 13.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between LIF and GSIB is 0.28, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2024 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LIF vs. GSIB — Risk / Return Rank
LIF
GSIB
LIF vs. GSIB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Life360, Inc. (LIF) and Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LIF | GSIB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.43 | -0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.45 | 3.38 | -3.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.65 | 11.87 | -12.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LIF vs. GSIB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LIF drawdown since its inception was -65.64%, which is greater than GSIB's maximum drawdown of -17.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIF and GSIB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LIF | GSIB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.64% | -17.71% | -47.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -65.64% | -13.90% | -51.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.26% | -0.11% | -51.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.25% | -1.99% | -21.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 45.00% | 3.95% | +41.05% |
Volatility
LIF vs. GSIB - Volatility Comparison
Life360, Inc. (LIF) has a higher volatility of 16.79% compared to Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB) at 5.74%. This indicates that LIF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSIB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LIF | GSIB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.79% | 5.74% | +11.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 50.79% | 14.93% | +35.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 70.22% | 17.90% | +52.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.18% | 18.46% | +44.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 63.18% | 18.46% | +44.72% |
Dividends
LIF vs. GSIB - Dividend Comparison
LIF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GSIB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
GSIB Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF | 1.55% | 1.91% | 1.67% |
LIF Life360, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LIF and GSIB have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LIF has higher volatility (16.79%) compared to GSIB (5.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIF dropped -65.64% vs GSIB's -17.71%.
GSIB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LIF and GSIB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer