APH vs. GLW
Compare and contrast key facts about Amphenol Corporation (APH) and Corning Incorporated (GLW).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: APH or GLW.
Correlation
The correlation between APH and GLW is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
APH vs. GLW - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
APH:
1.09
GLW:
2.52
APH:
1.44
GLW:
3.34
APH:
1.23
GLW:
1.47
APH:
1.98
GLW:
1.19
APH:
5.50
GLW:
13.25
APH:
6.13%
GLW:
5.40%
APH:
31.05%
GLW:
28.47%
APH:
-63.41%
GLW:
-99.02%
APH:
-12.12%
GLW:
-29.84%
Fundamentals
APH:
$83.60B
GLW:
$45.30B
APH:
$1.92
GLW:
$0.58
APH:
35.95
GLW:
91.19
APH:
2.45
GLW:
0.55
APH:
$15.22B
GLW:
$13.12B
APH:
$5.14B
GLW:
$4.23B
APH:
$3.79B
GLW:
$2.29B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, APH achieves a -0.60% return, which is significantly lower than GLW's 11.30% return. Over the past 10 years, APH has outperformed GLW with an annualized return of 18.30%, while GLW has yielded a comparatively lower 10.80% annualized return.
APH
-0.60%
-0.56%
3.50%
31.94%
22.93%
18.30%
GLW
11.30%
6.12%
31.51%
70.62%
16.85%
10.80%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
APH vs. GLW — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
APH
GLW
APH vs. GLW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amphenol Corporation (APH) and Corning Incorporated (GLW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
APH vs. GLW - Dividend Comparison
APH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, less than GLW's 2.12% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APH Amphenol Corporation | 0.80% | 0.79% | 0.86% | 1.06% | 0.73% | 0.80% | 0.89% | 1.09% | 0.80% | 0.86% | 1.01% | 0.84% |
GLW Corning Incorporated | 2.12% | 2.36% | 3.68% | 3.38% | 2.58% | 2.44% | 2.75% | 2.38% | 1.94% | 2.22% | 2.63% | 1.74% |
Drawdowns
APH vs. GLW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum APH drawdown since its inception was -63.41%, smaller than the maximum GLW drawdown of -99.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APH and GLW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
APH vs. GLW - Volatility Comparison
Amphenol Corporation (APH) has a higher volatility of 17.33% compared to Corning Incorporated (GLW) at 13.21%. This indicates that APH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
APH vs. GLW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Amphenol Corporation and Corning Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities