APH vs. CDNS
Compare and contrast key facts about Amphenol Corporation (APH) and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: APH or CDNS.
Correlation
The correlation between APH and CDNS is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
APH vs. CDNS - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
APH:
0.88
CDNS:
0.27
APH:
1.41
CDNS:
0.75
APH:
1.21
CDNS:
1.10
APH:
1.48
CDNS:
0.46
APH:
3.83
CDNS:
0.92
APH:
9.49%
CDNS:
14.61%
APH:
37.98%
CDNS:
41.61%
APH:
-63.42%
CDNS:
-93.13%
APH:
0.00%
CDNS:
-1.51%
Fundamentals
APH:
$104.18B
CDNS:
$87.04B
APH:
$2.06
CDNS:
$3.93
APH:
41.73
CDNS:
81.11
APH:
2.16
CDNS:
3.36
APH:
6.21
CDNS:
17.86
APH:
10.07
CDNS:
18.26
APH:
$16.78B
CDNS:
$4.87B
APH:
$5.69B
CDNS:
$4.56B
APH:
$4.26B
CDNS:
$1.64B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, APH achieves a 25.42% return, which is significantly higher than CDNS's 7.02% return. Over the past 10 years, APH has underperformed CDNS with an annualized return of 20.81%, while CDNS has yielded a comparatively higher 32.51% annualized return.
APH
25.42%
34.14%
23.79%
33.12%
34.77%
20.81%
CDNS
7.02%
24.03%
10.99%
11.29%
31.49%
32.51%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
APH vs. CDNS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
APH
CDNS
APH vs. CDNS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amphenol Corporation (APH) and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
APH vs. CDNS - Dividend Comparison
APH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, while CDNS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APH Amphenol Corporation | 0.70% | 0.79% | 0.86% | 1.06% | 0.73% | 0.80% | 0.89% | 1.09% | 0.80% | 0.86% | 1.01% | 0.84% |
CDNS Cadence Design Systems, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
APH vs. CDNS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum APH drawdown since its inception was -63.42%, smaller than the maximum CDNS drawdown of -93.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APH and CDNS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Loading data...
Volatility
APH vs. CDNS - Volatility Comparison
Amphenol Corporation (APH) has a higher volatility of 11.21% compared to Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) at 10.37%. This indicates that APH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CDNS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...
Financials
APH vs. CDNS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Amphenol Corporation and Cadence Design Systems, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
APH vs. CDNS - Profitability Comparison
APH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Amphenol Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.64B and revenue of 4.81B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.2%.
CDNS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cadence Design Systems, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.19B and revenue of 1.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.9%.
APH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Amphenol Corporation reported an operating income of 1.02B and revenue of 4.81B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.3%.
CDNS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cadence Design Systems, Inc. reported an operating income of 361.52M and revenue of 1.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.1%.
APH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Amphenol Corporation reported a net income of 737.80M and revenue of 4.81B, resulting in a net margin of 15.3%.
CDNS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cadence Design Systems, Inc. reported a net income of 273.58M and revenue of 1.24B, resulting in a net margin of 22.0%.