APH vs. CDNS
Compare and contrast key facts about Amphenol Corporation (APH) and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: APH or CDNS.
Correlation
The correlation between APH and CDNS is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
APH vs. CDNS - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
APH:
1.76
CDNS:
0.33
APH:
2.12
CDNS:
0.72
APH:
1.33
CDNS:
1.09
APH:
2.71
CDNS:
0.46
APH:
8.87
CDNS:
0.98
APH:
5.22%
CDNS:
11.52%
APH:
26.38%
CDNS:
34.83%
APH:
-63.41%
CDNS:
-93.13%
APH:
-6.12%
CDNS:
-7.67%
Fundamentals
APH:
$89.53B
CDNS:
$85.39B
APH:
$1.75
CDNS:
$3.79
APH:
42.43
CDNS:
82.15
APH:
2.32
CDNS:
3.29
APH:
$14.23B
CDNS:
$4.35B
APH:
$4.76B
CDNS:
$3.91B
APH:
$3.50B
CDNS:
$1.49B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, APH achieves a 43.60% return, which is significantly higher than CDNS's 10.68% return. Over the past 10 years, APH has underperformed CDNS with an annualized return of 18.85%, while CDNS has yielded a comparatively higher 31.93% annualized return.
APH
43.60%
-0.22%
3.19%
44.83%
22.61%
18.85%
CDNS
10.68%
-0.84%
-5.31%
9.40%
33.94%
31.93%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
APH vs. CDNS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amphenol Corporation (APH) and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
APH vs. CDNS - Dividend Comparison
APH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, while CDNS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APH Amphenol Corporation | 0.78% | 0.86% | 1.06% | 0.73% | 0.80% | 0.89% | 1.09% | 0.80% | 0.86% | 1.01% | 0.84% | 0.68% |
CDNS Cadence Design Systems, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
APH vs. CDNS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum APH drawdown since its inception was -63.41%, smaller than the maximum CDNS drawdown of -93.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APH and CDNS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
APH vs. CDNS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amphenol Corporation (APH) is 8.16%, while Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) has a volatility of 9.93%. This indicates that APH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CDNS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
APH vs. CDNS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Amphenol Corporation and Cadence Design Systems, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities