APH vs. CDNS
Compare and contrast key facts about Amphenol Corporation (APH) and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS).
Performance
APH vs. CDNS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
APH vs. CDNS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APH Amphenol Corporation | -5.32% | 96.08% | 41.30% | 31.85% | -11.96% | 35.25% | 22.09% | 34.91% | -6.82% | 31.81% |
CDNS Cadence Design Systems, Inc. | -10.36% | 4.03% | 10.31% | 69.55% | -13.80% | 36.59% | 96.70% | 59.52% | 3.97% | 65.82% |
Fundamentals
APH:
$164.57B
CDNS:
$76.47B
APH:
$3.34
CDNS:
$4.06
APH:
38.28
CDNS:
69.06
APH:
1.27
CDNS:
5.27
APH:
7.08
CDNS:
14.46
APH:
12.27
CDNS:
10.76
APH:
$23.09B
CDNS:
$5.30B
APH:
$8.52B
CDNS:
$5.09B
APH:
$6.89B
CDNS:
$1.74B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, APH achieves a -5.32% return, which is significantly higher than CDNS's -10.36% return. Over the past 10 years, APH has underperformed CDNS with an annualized return of 25.43%, while CDNS has yielded a comparatively higher 28.05% annualized return.
APH
- 1D
- 1.07%
- 1M
- -5.33%
- YTD
- -5.32%
- 6M
- 2.84%
- 1Y
- 94.65%
- 3Y*
- 47.44%
- 5Y*
- 31.94%
- 10Y*
- 25.43%
CDNS
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- -7.64%
- YTD
- -10.36%
- 6M
- -20.39%
- 1Y
- 8.27%
- 3Y*
- 10.07%
- 5Y*
- 14.64%
- 10Y*
- 28.05%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
APH vs. CDNS — Risk / Return Rank
APH
CDNS
APH vs. CDNS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amphenol Corporation (APH) and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| APH | CDNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.32 | 0.21 | +2.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.66 | 0.60 | +2.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.08 | +0.33 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.41 | 0.36 | +3.05 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.77 | 0.80 | +10.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| APH | CDNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.32 | 0.21 | +2.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.09 | 0.42 | +0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 | 0.84 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.22 | +0.40 |
Correlation
The correlation between APH and CDNS is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
APH vs. CDNS - Dividend Comparison
APH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, while CDNS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APH Amphenol Corporation | 0.65% | 0.55% | 0.79% | 1.07% | 1.06% | 0.89% | 0.80% | 0.89% | 1.09% | 0.80% | 0.86% | 1.01% |
CDNS Cadence Design Systems, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
APH vs. CDNS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum APH drawdown since its inception was -63.41%, smaller than the maximum CDNS drawdown of -93.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APH and CDNS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| APH | CDNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.41% | -93.13% | +29.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.19% | -28.09% | -0.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.73% | -29.59% | +0.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.56% | -32.12% | -5.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.04% | -24.96% | +1.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.55% | -39.79% | +26.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.16% | 12.71% | -4.55% |
Volatility
APH vs. CDNS - Volatility Comparison
Amphenol Corporation (APH) has a higher volatility of 13.75% compared to Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) at 7.54%. This indicates that APH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CDNS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| APH | CDNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.75% | 7.54% | +6.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.93% | 25.41% | +8.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.07% | 39.60% | +1.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.46% | 35.24% | -5.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.16% | 33.42% | -6.26% |
Financials
APH vs. CDNS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Amphenol Corporation and Cadence Design Systems, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities