PortfoliosLab logo
APH vs. CDNS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between APH and CDNS is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

APH vs. CDNS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amphenol Corporation (APH) and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

APH:

0.88

CDNS:

0.27

Sortino Ratio

APH:

1.41

CDNS:

0.75

Omega Ratio

APH:

1.21

CDNS:

1.10

Calmar Ratio

APH:

1.48

CDNS:

0.46

Martin Ratio

APH:

3.83

CDNS:

0.92

Ulcer Index

APH:

9.49%

CDNS:

14.61%

Daily Std Dev

APH:

37.98%

CDNS:

41.61%

Max Drawdown

APH:

-63.42%

CDNS:

-93.13%

Current Drawdown

APH:

0.00%

CDNS:

-1.51%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

APH:

$104.18B

CDNS:

$87.04B

EPS

APH:

$2.06

CDNS:

$3.93

PE Ratio

APH:

41.73

CDNS:

81.11

PEG Ratio

APH:

2.16

CDNS:

3.36

PS Ratio

APH:

6.21

CDNS:

17.86

PB Ratio

APH:

10.07

CDNS:

18.26

Total Revenue (TTM)

APH:

$16.78B

CDNS:

$4.87B

Gross Profit (TTM)

APH:

$5.69B

CDNS:

$4.56B

EBITDA (TTM)

APH:

$4.26B

CDNS:

$1.64B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APH achieves a 25.42% return, which is significantly higher than CDNS's 7.02% return. Over the past 10 years, APH has underperformed CDNS with an annualized return of 20.81%, while CDNS has yielded a comparatively higher 32.51% annualized return.


APH

YTD

25.42%

1M

34.14%

6M

23.79%

1Y

33.12%

5Y*

34.77%

10Y*

20.81%

CDNS

YTD

7.02%

1M

24.03%

6M

10.99%

1Y

11.29%

5Y*

31.49%

10Y*

32.51%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

APH vs. CDNS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of APH is 8181
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of APH is 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of APH is 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of APH is 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of APH is 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of APH is 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

CDNS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CDNS is 6363
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CDNS is 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CDNS is 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CDNS is 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CDNS is 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CDNS is 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

APH vs. CDNS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amphenol Corporation (APH) and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current APH Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is higher than the CDNS Sharpe Ratio of 0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APH and CDNS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

APH vs. CDNS - Dividend Comparison

APH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, while CDNS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
APH
Amphenol Corporation
0.70%0.79%0.86%1.06%0.73%0.80%0.89%1.09%0.80%0.86%1.01%0.84%
CDNS
Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

APH vs. CDNS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APH drawdown since its inception was -63.42%, smaller than the maximum CDNS drawdown of -93.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APH and CDNS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

APH vs. CDNS - Volatility Comparison

Amphenol Corporation (APH) has a higher volatility of 11.21% compared to Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) at 10.37%. This indicates that APH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CDNS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

APH vs. CDNS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Amphenol Corporation and Cadence Design Systems, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20212022202320242025
4.81B
1.24B
(APH) Total Revenue
(CDNS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

APH vs. CDNS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Amphenol Corporation and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
34.2%
95.9%
(APH) Gross Margin
(CDNS) Gross Margin
APH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Amphenol Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.64B and revenue of 4.81B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.2%.

CDNS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cadence Design Systems, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.19B and revenue of 1.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.9%.

APH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Amphenol Corporation reported an operating income of 1.02B and revenue of 4.81B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.3%.

CDNS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cadence Design Systems, Inc. reported an operating income of 361.52M and revenue of 1.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.1%.

APH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Amphenol Corporation reported a net income of 737.80M and revenue of 4.81B, resulting in a net margin of 15.3%.

CDNS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cadence Design Systems, Inc. reported a net income of 273.58M and revenue of 1.24B, resulting in a net margin of 22.0%.