LFVN vs. WLFC
LFVN (LifeVantage Corporation) and WLFC (Willis Lease Finance Corporation) are both stocks. LFVN operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive), while WLFC operates in Rental & Leasing Services (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, LFVN returned -2.69%/yr vs 23.34%/yr for WLFC. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LFVN vs. WLFC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LFVN achieves a 49.30% return, which is significantly higher than WLFC's 40.80% return. Over the past 10 years, LFVN has underperformed WLFC with an annualized return of -2.69%, while WLFC has yielded a comparatively higher 23.34% annualized return.
LFVN
- 1D
- -4.64%
- 1M
- 72.82%
- YTD
- 49.30%
- 6M
- 41.49%
- 1Y
- -27.80%
- 3Y*
- 23.99%
- 5Y*
- 4.26%
- 10Y*
- -2.69%
WLFC
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- -10.11%
- YTD
- 40.80%
- 6M
- 43.65%
- 1Y
- 31.69%
- 3Y*
- 66.56%
- 5Y*
- 33.79%
- 10Y*
- 23.34%
LFVN vs. WLFC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LFVN LifeVantage Corporation | 49.30% | -64.29% | 197.21% | 74.03% | -39.78% | -32.19% | -40.29% | 18.35% | 177.10% | -41.60% |
WLFC Willis Lease Finance Corporation | 40.80% | -34.14% | 332.92% | -17.17% | 56.73% | 23.60% | -48.29% | 70.26% | 38.57% | -2.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between LFVN and WLFC is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 2004 | 0.08 |
The correlation between LFVN and WLFC shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (all time) to 0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LFVN:
$114.57M
WLFC:
$1.38B
LFVN:
$0.45
WLFC:
$17.02
LFVN:
20.25
WLFC:
11.18
LFVN:
0.50
WLFC:
0.00
LFVN:
0.60
WLFC:
1.78
LFVN:
3.44
WLFC:
1.99
LFVN:
$195.32M
WLFC:
$757.62M
LFVN:
$152.62M
WLFC:
$405.87M
LFVN:
$8.69M
WLFC:
$416.98M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LFVN vs. WLFC — Risk / Return Rank
LFVN
WLFC
LFVN vs. WLFC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LifeVantage Corporation (LFVN) and Willis Lease Finance Corporation (WLFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LFVN | WLFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.15 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.39 | 1.00 | -1.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.57 | 2.00 | -2.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LFVN vs. WLFC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LFVN drawdown since its inception was -99.57%, which is greater than WLFC's maximum drawdown of -88.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFVN and WLFC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LFVN | WLFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.57% | -88.12% | -11.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -71.73% | -31.84% | -39.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -83.90% | -49.88% | -34.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -83.90% | -49.88% | -34.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -83.90% | -79.76% | -4.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -90.72% | -20.21% | -70.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -89.57% | -42.35% | -47.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 48.66% | 15.87% | +32.79% |
Volatility
LFVN vs. WLFC - Volatility Comparison
LifeVantage Corporation (LFVN) has a higher volatility of 38.68% compared to Willis Lease Finance Corporation (WLFC) at 16.30%. This indicates that LFVN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WLFC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LFVN | WLFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 38.68% | 16.30% | +22.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 60.12% | 36.76% | +23.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 71.93% | 46.92% | +25.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 65.11% | 42.82% | +22.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.48% | 50.96% | +10.52% |
Dividends
LFVN vs. WLFC - Dividend Comparison
LFVN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, more than WLFC's 0.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LFVN LifeVantage Corporation | 2.04% | 2.84% | 0.88% | 8.33% | 2.42% |
WLFC Willis Lease Finance Corporation | 0.76% | 0.85% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
LFVN vs. WLFC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LifeVantage Corporation and Willis Lease Finance Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LFVN vs. WLFC - Profitability Comparison
LFVN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LifeVantage Corporation reported a gross profit of 34.54M and revenue of 43.72M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.0%.
WLFC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Willis Lease Finance Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 194.35M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
LFVN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LifeVantage Corporation reported an operating income of 1.68M and revenue of 43.72M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.8%.
WLFC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Willis Lease Finance Corporation reported an operating income of 33.79M and revenue of 194.35M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.4%.
LFVN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LifeVantage Corporation reported a net income of 1.36M and revenue of 43.72M, resulting in a net margin of 3.1%.
WLFC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Willis Lease Finance Corporation reported a net income of 23.66M and revenue of 194.35M, resulting in a net margin of 12.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LFVN and WLFC have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LFVN has higher volatility (38.68%) compared to WLFC (16.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LFVN dropped -99.57% vs WLFC's -88.12%.
WLFC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.68 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LFVN and WLFC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer