WLFC vs. ABTC
WLFC (Willis Lease Finance Corporation) and ABTC (American Bitcoin Corp) are both stocks. WLFC operates in Rental & Leasing Services (Industrials), while ABTC operates in Capital Markets (Financial Services). At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
WLFC vs. ABTC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WLFC achieves a 54.64% return, which is significantly higher than ABTC's -52.25% return.
WLFC
- 1D
- 1.23%
- 1M
- 14.38%
- YTD
- 54.64%
- 6M
- 53.47%
- 1Y
- 51.53%
- 3Y*
- 75.23%
- 5Y*
- 37.09%
- 10Y*
- 25.11%
ABTC
- 1D
- -4.55%
- 1M
- -26.87%
- YTD
- -52.25%
- 6M
- -58.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WLFC vs. ABTC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WLFC Willis Lease Finance Corporation | 54.64% | -8.49% |
ABTC American Bitcoin Corp | -52.25% | -76.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between WLFC and ABTC is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 2, 2025 | 0.13 |
Fundamentals
WLFC:
$1.52B
ABTC:
$826.17M
WLFC:
$17.02
ABTC:
-$0.15
WLFC:
1.95
ABTC:
3.67
WLFC:
2.18
ABTC:
1.19
WLFC:
$757.62M
ABTC:
$206.04M
WLFC:
$405.87M
ABTC:
$40.82M
WLFC:
$416.98M
ABTC:
$85.98M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WLFC vs. ABTC — Risk / Return Rank
WLFC
ABTC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
WLFC vs. ABTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Willis Lease Finance Corporation (WLFC) and American Bitcoin Corp (ABTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WLFC | ABTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.63 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.22 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WLFC vs. ABTC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WLFC drawdown since its inception was -88.12%, roughly equal to the maximum ABTC drawdown of -91.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WLFC and ABTC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WLFC | ABTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.12% | -91.51% | +3.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.84% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.88% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.88% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -79.76% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.36% | -91.28% | +78.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.33% | -69.88% | +27.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.04% | — | — |
Volatility
WLFC vs. ABTC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WLFC | ABTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.54% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.11% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.33% | 100.04% | -52.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.93% | 100.04% | -57.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.02% | 100.04% | -49.02% |
Dividends
WLFC vs. ABTC - Dividend Comparison
WLFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, while ABTC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ABTC American Bitcoin Corp | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WLFC Willis Lease Finance Corporation | 0.69% | 0.85% | 0.72% |
Financials
WLFC vs. ABTC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Willis Lease Finance Corporation and American Bitcoin Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
WLFC and ABTC have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for WLFC and ABTC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer