WLFC vs. SPY
WLFC (Willis Lease Finance Corporation) is a stock, while SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) is S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Over the past 10 years, WLFC returned 21.80%/yr vs 15.57%/yr for SPY. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
WLFC vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WLFC achieves a 29.16% return, which is significantly higher than SPY's 11.69% return. Over the past 10 years, WLFC has outperformed SPY with an annualized return of 21.80%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively lower 15.57% annualized return.
WLFC
- 1D
- 1.75%
- 1M
- -10.66%
- YTD
- 29.16%
- 6M
- 45.52%
- 1Y
- 30.85%
- 3Y*
- 65.03%
- 5Y*
- 32.26%
- 10Y*
- 21.80%
SPY
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 5.40%
- YTD
- 11.69%
- 6M
- 12.09%
- 1Y
- 29.62%
- 3Y*
- 22.64%
- 5Y*
- 14.20%
- 10Y*
- 15.57%
WLFC vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WLFC Willis Lease Finance Corporation | 29.16% | -34.14% | 332.92% | -17.17% | 56.73% | 23.60% | -48.29% | 70.26% | 38.57% | -2.38% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 11.69% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 18.33% | 31.22% | -4.57% | 21.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between WLFC and SPY is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 1996 | 0.21 |
Over the past year, WLFC and SPY have become more correlated (0.47) than their long-term average of 0.21, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WLFC vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
WLFC
SPY
WLFC vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Willis Lease Finance Corporation (WLFC) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WLFC | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.66 | 2.52 | -1.86 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.28 | 3.42 | -2.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.46 | -0.31 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.97 | 3.42 | -2.44 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.02 | 15.93 | -13.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WLFC | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 | 2.52 | -1.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | 0.84 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.87 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.59 | -0.39 |
Drawdowns
WLFC vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WLFC drawdown since its inception was -88.12%, which is greater than SPY's maximum drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WLFC and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WLFC | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.12% | -55.19% | -32.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.84% | -8.88% | -22.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.88% | -18.76% | -31.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.88% | -24.50% | -25.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -79.76% | -33.72% | -46.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.81% | 0.00% | -26.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.37% | -9.05% | -33.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.33% | 1.91% | +13.42% |
Volatility
WLFC vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
Willis Lease Finance Corporation (WLFC) has a higher volatility of 22.87% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 2.75%. This indicates that WLFC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WLFC | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.87% | 2.75% | +20.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.85% | 8.89% | +27.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.81% | 11.81% | +35.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.70% | 17.05% | +25.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.93% | 17.94% | +32.99% |
Dividends
WLFC vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
WLFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, less than SPY's 0.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 0.97% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
WLFC Willis Lease Finance Corporation | 0.83% | 0.85% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WLFC and SPY have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WLFC has higher volatility (22.87%) compared to SPY (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WLFC dropped -88.12% vs SPY's -55.19%.
SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WLFC and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer