LFVN vs. LIDRW
LFVN (LifeVantage Corporation) and LIDRW (AEye Inc) are both stocks. LFVN operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive), while LIDRW operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology). Over the past 5 years, LFVN returned 1.51%/yr vs -60.81%/yr for LIDRW. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LFVN vs. LIDRW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LFVN achieves a 2.12% return, which is significantly higher than LIDRW's -84.35% return.
LFVN
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- -31.60%
- 6M
- -7.36%
- YTD
- 2.12%
- 1Y
- -47.08%
- 3Y*
- 15.63%
- 5Y*
- 1.51%
- 10Y*
- -7.26%
LIDRW
- 1D
- -8.44%
- 1M
- -36.20%
- 6M
- -88.05%
- YTD
- -84.35%
- 1Y
- -79.83%
- 3Y*
- 10.68%
- 5Y*
- -60.81%
- 10Y*
- —
LFVN vs. LIDRW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LFVN LifeVantage Corporation | 2.12% | -64.29% | 197.21% | 74.03% | -39.78% | -34.58% |
LIDRW AEye Inc | -84.35% | 12.62% | 1,233.33% | -85.00% | -95.70% | -81.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between LFVN and LIDRW is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 6, 2021 | 0.05 |
Fundamentals
LFVN:
$78.09M
LIDRW:
$56.82M
LFVN:
$0.45
LIDRW:
-$0.85
LFVN:
0.41
LIDRW:
2.11
LFVN:
2.35
LIDRW:
0.01
LFVN:
$195.32M
LIDRW:
$270.00K
LFVN:
$152.62M
LIDRW:
-$389.00K
LFVN:
$8.69M
LIDRW:
-$35.49M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LFVN vs. LIDRW — Risk / Return Rank
LFVN
LIDRW
LFVN vs. LIDRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LifeVantage Corporation (LFVN) and AEye Inc (LIDRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LFVN | LIDRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.19 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.66 | -0.83 | +0.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.92 | -1.06 | +0.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LFVN vs. LIDRW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LFVN drawdown since its inception was -99.57%, roughly equal to the maximum LIDRW drawdown of -99.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFVN and LIDRW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LFVN | LIDRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.57% | -99.93% | +0.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -71.73% | -96.63% | +24.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -83.90% | -96.63% | +12.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -83.90% | -99.81% | +15.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -83.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.65% | -99.72% | +6.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -89.58% | -92.13% | +2.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 50.95% | 75.03% | -24.08% |
Volatility
LFVN vs. LIDRW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for LifeVantage Corporation (LFVN) is 34.84%, while AEye Inc (LIDRW) has a volatility of 76.29%. This indicates that LFVN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LIDRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LFVN | LIDRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 34.84% | 76.29% | -41.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 68.97% | 199.82% | -130.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 77.26% | 352.41% | -275.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 66.42% | 360.71% | -294.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.97% | 346.90% | -284.93% |
Dividends
LFVN vs. LIDRW - Dividend Comparison
LFVN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.99%, while LIDRW has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LFVN LifeVantage Corporation | 2.99% | 2.84% | 0.88% | 8.33% | 2.42% |
LIDRW AEye Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
LFVN vs. LIDRW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LifeVantage Corporation and AEye Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
LFVN and LIDRW have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LIDRW has higher volatility (76.29%) compared to LFVN (34.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LFVN dropped -99.57% vs LIDRW's -99.93%.
LIDRW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.23 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LFVN and LIDRW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer