LIDRW vs. DTM

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

LIDRW (AEye Inc) and DTM (DT Midstream, Inc.) are both stocks. LIDRW operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology), while DTM operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy). Over the past 3 years, LIDRW returned -6.59%/yr vs 51.46%/yr for DTM. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

LIDRW vs. DTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AEye Inc (LIDRW) and DT Midstream, Inc. (DTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LIDRW achieves a -84.35% return, which is significantly lower than DTM's 22.73% return.

LIDRW

• 1D: -2.08%
• 1M: -54.66%
• YTD: -84.35%
• 6M: -84.33%
• 1Y: -72.88%
• 3Y*: -6.59%
• 5Y*: -61.42%
• 10Y*: —

DTM

• 1D: 1.21%
• 1M: -3.43%
• YTD: 22.73%
• 6M: 22.89%
• 1Y: 40.19%
• 3Y*: 51.46%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LIDRW vs. DTM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
LIDRW AEye Inc	-84.35%	12.62%	1,233.33%	-85.00%	-95.70%	-42.23%
DTM DT Midstream, Inc.	22.73%	24.13%	88.95%	4.71%	20.73%	27.38%

Correlation

The correlation between LIDRW and DTM is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.12
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.01
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021	0.01

The correlation between LIDRW and DTM shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap LIDRW : $637.52K DTM : $14.90B
EPS LIDRW : -$0.98 DTM : $4.55
PS Ratio LIDRW : 1.83 DTM : 11.66
PB Ratio LIDRW : 0.01 DTM : 3.13
Total Revenue (TTM) LIDRW : $270.00K DTM : $1.28B
Gross Profit (TTM) LIDRW : -$389.00K DTM : $810.00M
EBITDA (TTM) LIDRW : -$35.49M DTM : $1.06B

Return for Risk

LIDRW vs. DTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LIDRW

LIDRW Risk / Return Rank: 43
LIDRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
LIDRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
LIDRW Omega Ratio Rank: 71
LIDRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
LIDRW Martin Ratio Rank: 21

DTM

DTM Risk / Return Rank: 87
DTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
DTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
DTM Omega Ratio Rank: 84
DTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
DTM Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LIDRW vs. DTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AEye Inc (LIDRW) and DT Midstream, Inc. (DTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LIDRW	DTM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.21	1.89	-2.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.91	2.65	-0.74
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.34	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.76	4.13	-4.89
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.02	9.73	-10.74

LIDRW vs. DTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LIDRW Sharpe Ratio is -0.21, which is lower than the DTM Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LIDRW and DTM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LIDRW vs. DTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LIDRW drawdown since its inception was -99.93%, which is greater than DTM's maximum drawdown of -23.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIDRW and DTM.

Drawdown Indicators

	LIDRW	DTM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.93%	-23.56%	-76.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-96.56%	-9.77%	-86.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-96.56%	-23.56%	-73.00%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-99.81%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.72%	-3.43%	-96.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-92.05%	-5.99%	-86.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	71.71%	4.14%	+67.57%

Volatility

LIDRW vs. DTM - Volatility Comparison

AEye Inc (LIDRW) has a higher volatility of 63.25% compared to DT Midstream, Inc. (DTM) at 5.93%. This indicates that LIDRW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LIDRW	DTM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	63.25%	5.93%	+57.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	200.95%	15.30%	+185.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	353.85%	21.42%	+332.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	359.78%	25.75%	+334.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	347.77%	25.75%	+322.02%

Dividends

LIDRW vs. DTM - Dividend Comparison

LIDRW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DTM DT Midstream, Inc.	2.34%	2.74%	2.96%	5.04%	4.63%	2.50%
LIDRW AEye Inc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LIDRW and DTM in my portfolio?

LIDRW and DTM have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LIDRW or DTM?

LIDRW has higher volatility (63.25%) compared to DTM (5.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIDRW dropped -99.93% vs DTM's -23.56%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.