LIDRW vs. TRGP
LIDRW (AEye Inc) and TRGP (Targa Resources Corp.) are both stocks. LIDRW operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology), while TRGP operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy). Over the past 5 years, LIDRW returned -61.63%/yr vs 45.56%/yr for TRGP. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LIDRW vs. TRGP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LIDRW achieves a -84.68% return, which is significantly lower than TRGP's 47.11% return.
LIDRW
- 1D
- -2.13%
- 1M
- -55.63%
- YTD
- -84.68%
- 6M
- -87.37%
- 1Y
- -72.40%
- 3Y*
- -7.26%
- 5Y*
- -61.63%
- 10Y*
- —
TRGP
- 1D
- 1.59%
- 1M
- -2.90%
- YTD
- 47.11%
- 6M
- 46.88%
- 1Y
- 66.86%
- 3Y*
- 60.15%
- 5Y*
- 45.56%
- 10Y*
- 26.03%
LIDRW vs. TRGP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LIDRW AEye Inc | -84.68% | 12.62% | 1,233.33% | -85.00% | -95.70% | -81.21% |
TRGP Targa Resources Corp. | 47.11% | 5.65% | 110.12% | 21.01% | 43.71% | 90.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between LIDRW and TRGP is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 6, 2021 | 0.01 |
Fundamentals
LIDRW:
-$0.98
TRGP:
$13.11
LIDRW:
1.79
TRGP:
2.66
LIDRW:
$270.00K
TRGP:
$16.38B
LIDRW:
-$389.00K
TRGP:
$3.62B
LIDRW:
-$35.49M
TRGP:
$4.49B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LIDRW vs. TRGP — Risk / Return Rank
LIDRW
TRGP
LIDRW vs. TRGP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AEye Inc (LIDRW) and Targa Resources Corp. (TRGP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LIDRW | TRGP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.38 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.75 | 4.12 | -4.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.01 | 13.33 | -14.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LIDRW vs. TRGP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LIDRW drawdown since its inception was -99.93%, roughly equal to the maximum TRGP drawdown of -95.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIDRW and TRGP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LIDRW | TRGP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.93% | -95.21% | -4.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -96.63% | -16.30% | -80.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -96.63% | -31.61% | -65.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.81% | -31.61% | -68.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -90.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.72% | -2.90% | -96.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -92.06% | -33.51% | -58.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 71.97% | 5.03% | +66.94% |
Volatility
LIDRW vs. TRGP - Volatility Comparison
AEye Inc (LIDRW) has a higher volatility of 63.20% compared to Targa Resources Corp. (TRGP) at 8.68%. This indicates that LIDRW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRGP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LIDRW | TRGP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 63.20% | 8.68% | +54.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 200.95% | 18.42% | +182.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 353.16% | 27.44% | +325.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 359.79% | 31.74% | +328.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 347.65% | 47.63% | +300.02% |
Dividends
LIDRW vs. TRGP - Dividend Comparison
LIDRW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TRGP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LIDRW AEye Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TRGP Targa Resources Corp. | 1.58% | 2.03% | 1.54% | 2.13% | 1.90% | 0.77% | 4.59% | 8.92% | 10.11% | 7.52% | 6.49% | 12.53% |
Financials
LIDRW vs. TRGP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AEye Inc and Targa Resources Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
LIDRW and TRGP have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LIDRW has higher volatility (63.20%) compared to TRGP (8.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIDRW dropped -99.93% vs TRGP's -95.21%.
TRGP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LIDRW and TRGP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer