PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LIDRW vs. TRGP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LIDRW vs. TRGP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AEye Inc (LIDRW) and Targa Resources Corp. (TRGP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LIDRW achieves a -84.68% return, which is significantly lower than TRGP's 47.11% return.


LIDRW

1D
-2.13%
1M
-55.63%
YTD
-84.68%
6M
-87.37%
1Y
-72.40%
3Y*
-7.26%
5Y*
-61.63%
10Y*

TRGP

1D
1.59%
1M
-2.90%
YTD
47.11%
6M
46.88%
1Y
66.86%
3Y*
60.15%
5Y*
45.56%
10Y*
26.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LIDRW vs. TRGP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
LIDRW
AEye Inc
-84.68%12.62%1,233.33%-85.00%-95.70%-81.21%
TRGP
Targa Resources Corp.
47.11%5.65%110.12%21.01%43.71%90.06%

Correlation

The correlation between LIDRW and TRGP is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 6, 2021

0.01

Fundamentals

EPS

LIDRW:

-$0.98

TRGP:

$13.11

PS Ratio

LIDRW:

1.79

TRGP:

2.66

Total Revenue (TTM)

LIDRW:

$270.00K

TRGP:

$16.38B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LIDRW:

-$389.00K

TRGP:

$3.62B

EBITDA (TTM)

LIDRW:

-$35.49M

TRGP:

$4.49B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LIDRW vs. TRGP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LIDRW
LIDRW Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
LIDRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LIDRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
LIDRW Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
LIDRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
LIDRW Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

TRGP
TRGP Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
TRGP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRGP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRGP Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
TRGP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRGP Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LIDRW vs. TRGP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AEye Inc (LIDRW) and Targa Resources Corp. (TRGP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LIDRWTRGPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.38

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.75

4.12

-4.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.01

13.33

-14.34

LIDRW vs. TRGP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LIDRW Sharpe Ratio is -0.21, which is lower than the TRGP Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LIDRW and TRGP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LIDRW vs. TRGP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LIDRW drawdown since its inception was -99.93%, roughly equal to the maximum TRGP drawdown of -95.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIDRW and TRGP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LIDRWTRGPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.93%

-95.21%

-4.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-96.63%

-16.30%

-80.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-96.63%

-31.61%

-65.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.81%

-31.61%

-68.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-90.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.72%

-2.90%

-96.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-92.06%

-33.51%

-58.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

71.97%

5.03%

+66.94%

Volatility

LIDRW vs. TRGP - Volatility Comparison

AEye Inc (LIDRW) has a higher volatility of 63.20% compared to Targa Resources Corp. (TRGP) at 8.68%. This indicates that LIDRW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRGP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LIDRWTRGPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

63.20%

8.68%

+54.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

200.95%

18.42%

+182.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

353.16%

27.44%

+325.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

359.79%

31.74%

+328.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

347.65%

47.63%

+300.02%

Dividends

LIDRW vs. TRGP - Dividend Comparison

LIDRW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TRGP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LIDRW
AEye Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TRGP
Targa Resources Corp.
1.58%2.03%1.54%2.13%1.90%0.77%4.59%8.92%10.11%7.52%6.49%12.53%

Financials

LIDRW vs. TRGP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AEye Inc and Targa Resources Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20222023202420252026
101.00K
4.09B
(LIDRW) Total Revenue
(TRGP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


LIDRW and TRGP have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LIDRW has higher volatility (63.20%) compared to TRGP (8.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIDRW dropped -99.93% vs TRGP's -95.21%.

TRGP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LIDRW and TRGP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer