LIDRW vs. CALM
LIDRW (AEye Inc) and CALM (Cal-Maine Foods, Inc.) are both stocks. LIDRW operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology), while CALM operates in Farm Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 5 years, LIDRW returned -60.33%/yr vs 22.19%/yr for CALM. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LIDRW vs. CALM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LIDRW achieves a -81.69% return, which is significantly lower than CALM's -0.36% return.
LIDRW
- 1D
- -10.81%
- 1M
- -50.89%
- YTD
- -81.69%
- 6M
- -83.37%
- 1Y
- -66.67%
- 3Y*
- 7.72%
- 5Y*
- -60.33%
- 10Y*
- —
CALM
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- 2.95%
- YTD
- -0.36%
- 6M
- -4.29%
- 1Y
- -17.12%
- 3Y*
- 26.51%
- 5Y*
- 22.19%
- 10Y*
- 9.47%
LIDRW vs. CALM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LIDRW AEye Inc | -81.69% | 12.62% | 1,233.33% | -85.00% | -95.70% | -81.21% |
CALM Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. | -0.36% | -15.61% | 87.00% | 14.48% | 51.87% | -0.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between LIDRW and CALM is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 6, 2021 | 0.02 |
The correlation between LIDRW and CALM shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.05 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LIDRW:
$746.04K
CALM:
$3.71B
LIDRW:
-$0.98
CALM:
$14.48
LIDRW:
2.14
CALM:
1.08
LIDRW:
0.01
CALM:
1.37
LIDRW:
$270.00K
CALM:
$3.46B
LIDRW:
-$389.00K
CALM:
$1.17B
LIDRW:
-$35.49M
CALM:
$1.05B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LIDRW vs. CALM — Risk / Return Rank
LIDRW
CALM
LIDRW vs. CALM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AEye Inc (LIDRW) and Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. (CALM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LIDRW | CALM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 0.93 | +0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.69 | -0.46 | -0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.92 | -0.70 | -0.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LIDRW vs. CALM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LIDRW drawdown since its inception was -99.93%, which is greater than CALM's maximum drawdown of -74.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIDRW and CALM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LIDRW | CALM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.93% | -74.08% | -25.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -96.63% | -37.00% | -59.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -96.63% | -37.00% | -59.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.81% | -37.00% | -62.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.67% | -31.05% | -68.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -92.07% | -30.31% | -61.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 72.47% | 24.57% | +47.90% |
Volatility
LIDRW vs. CALM - Volatility Comparison
AEye Inc (LIDRW) has a higher volatility of 69.81% compared to Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. (CALM) at 7.81%. This indicates that LIDRW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CALM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LIDRW | CALM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 69.81% | 7.81% | +62.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 203.48% | 20.65% | +182.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 354.85% | 33.06% | +321.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 360.12% | 32.70% | +327.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 347.71% | 31.18% | +316.53% |
Dividends
LIDRW vs. CALM - Dividend Comparison
LIDRW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CALM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.14%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CALM Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. | 6.14% | 10.90% | 2.82% | 7.51% | 3.17% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.98% | 1.03% | 0.00% | 2.70% | 4.10% |
LIDRW AEye Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
LIDRW vs. CALM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AEye Inc and Cal-Maine Foods, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
LIDRW and CALM have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LIDRW has higher volatility (69.81%) compared to CALM (7.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIDRW dropped -99.93% vs CALM's -74.08%.
LIDRW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.19 vs -0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LIDRW and CALM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer