LIDRW vs. CALM

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

LIDRW (AEye Inc) and CALM (Cal-Maine Foods, Inc.) are both stocks. LIDRW operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology), while CALM operates in Farm Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 5 years, LIDRW returned -62.08%/yr vs 25.82%/yr for CALM. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

LIDRW vs. CALM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AEye Inc (LIDRW) and Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. (CALM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LIDRW achieves a -86.68% return, which is significantly lower than CALM's 12.43% return.

LIDRW

• 1D: -24.53%
• 1M: -52.94%
• 6M: -88.14%
• YTD: -86.68%
• 1Y: -79.52%
• 3Y*: 10.47%
• 5Y*: -62.08%
• 10Y*: —

CALM

• 1D: 3.42%
• 1M: 11.70%
• 6M: 16.00%
• YTD: 12.43%
• 1Y: -11.09%
• 3Y*: 33.05%
• 5Y*: 25.82%
• 10Y*: 10.18%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LIDRW vs. CALM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
LIDRW AEye Inc	-86.68%	12.62%	1,233.33%	-85.00%	-95.70%	-81.21%
CALM Cal-Maine Foods, Inc.	12.43%	-15.61%	87.00%	14.48%	51.87%	-0.69%

Correlation

The correlation between LIDRW and CALM is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.04
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.04
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.03
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 6, 2021	0.02

Fundamentals

Market Cap LIDRW : $42.53M CALM : $4.18B
EPS LIDRW : -$0.85 CALM : $14.48
PS Ratio LIDRW : 1.79 CALM : 1.22
PB Ratio LIDRW : 0.01 CALM : 1.55
Total Revenue (TTM) LIDRW : $270.00K CALM : $3.46B
Gross Profit (TTM) LIDRW : -$389.00K CALM : $1.17B
EBITDA (TTM) LIDRW : -$35.49M CALM : $1.05B

Return for Risk

LIDRW vs. CALM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LIDRW

LIDRW Risk / Return Rank: 42
LIDRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
LIDRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
LIDRW Omega Ratio Rank: 70
LIDRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
LIDRW Martin Ratio Rank: 21

CALM

CALM Risk / Return Rank: 31
CALM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
CALM Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
CALM Omega Ratio Rank: 27
CALM Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
CALM Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LIDRW vs. CALM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AEye Inc (LIDRW) and Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. (CALM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LIDRW	CALM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.23	-0.33	+0.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.71	-0.25	+1.96
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	0.97	+0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.82	-0.30	-0.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.05	-0.44	-0.61

LIDRW vs. CALM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LIDRW Sharpe Ratio is -0.23, which is higher than the CALM Sharpe Ratio of -0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LIDRW and CALM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LIDRW vs. CALM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LIDRW drawdown since its inception was -99.93%, which is greater than CALM's maximum drawdown of -74.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIDRW and CALM.

Drawdown Indicators

	LIDRW	CALM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.93%	-74.08%	-25.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-97.07%	-37.00%	-60.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-97.07%	-37.00%	-60.07%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-99.81%	-37.00%	-62.81%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.12%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.76%	-22.20%	-77.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-92.14%	-30.30%	-61.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	75.75%	25.34%	+50.41%

Volatility

LIDRW vs. CALM - Volatility Comparison

AEye Inc (LIDRW) has a higher volatility of 82.20% compared to Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. (CALM) at 11.13%. This indicates that LIDRW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CALM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LIDRW	CALM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	82.20%	11.13%	+71.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	200.92%	22.02%	+178.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	353.00%	34.13%	+318.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	361.00%	32.89%	+328.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	346.80%	31.28%	+315.52%

Dividends

LIDRW vs. CALM - Dividend Comparison

LIDRW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CALM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.44%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CALM Cal-Maine Foods, Inc.	5.44%	10.90%	2.82%	7.51%	3.17%	0.09%	0.00%	0.98%	1.03%	0.00%	2.70%	4.10%
LIDRW AEye Inc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LIDRW and CALM in my portfolio?

LIDRW and CALM have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LIDRW or CALM?

LIDRW has higher volatility (82.20%) compared to CALM (11.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIDRW dropped -99.93% vs CALM's -74.08%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LIDRW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.23 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.