PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LEAD vs. DFND
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

LEAD vs. DFND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF (LEAD) and Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LEAD vs. DFND - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LEAD
Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF
0.76%15.52%10.32%26.25%-18.16%29.69%23.41%33.75%-6.63%24.89%
DFND
Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF
0.00%10.37%8.48%12.13%-19.59%14.80%16.12%19.53%-1.83%16.33%

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, LEAD has outperformed DFND with an annualized return of 13.14%, while DFND has yielded a comparatively lower 6.81% annualized return.


LEAD

1D
2.93%
1M
-5.30%
YTD
0.76%
6M
1.13%
1Y
19.19%
3Y*
14.10%
5Y*
10.07%
10Y*
13.14%

DFND

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
1.22%
1Y
6.91%
3Y*
8.54%
5Y*
4.58%
10Y*
6.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LEAD vs. DFND - Expense Ratio Comparison

LEAD has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than DFND's 1.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

LEAD vs. DFND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LEAD
LEAD Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
LEAD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LEAD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
LEAD Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
LEAD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
LEAD Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

DFND
DFND Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
DFND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFND Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFND Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
DFND Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFND Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LEAD vs. DFND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF (LEAD) and Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LEADDFNDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.04

0.46

+0.58

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.57

0.81

+0.76

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.12

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.86

-0.05

+1.90

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.30

-0.12

+8.42

LEAD vs. DFND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LEAD Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is higher than the DFND Sharpe Ratio of 0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LEAD and DFND, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LEADDFNDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.04

0.46

+0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.21

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

0.36

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

0.36

+0.37

Correlation

The correlation between LEAD and DFND is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

LEAD vs. DFND - Dividend Comparison

LEAD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, more than DFND's 0.62% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
LEAD
Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF
0.66%0.70%0.93%1.13%1.27%1.79%0.81%1.32%1.38%0.97%1.38%
DFND
Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF
0.62%1.10%1.64%1.84%0.29%0.00%0.00%0.77%0.53%0.02%0.00%

Drawdowns

LEAD vs. DFND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LEAD drawdown since its inception was -32.19%, which is greater than DFND's maximum drawdown of -22.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEAD and DFND.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


LEADDFNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.19%

-22.65%

-9.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.87%

-7.48%

-3.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.93%

-22.65%

-2.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.19%

-22.65%

-9.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.97%

-3.69%

-2.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.48%

-5.73%

+1.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.43%

3.80%

-1.37%

Volatility

LEAD vs. DFND - Volatility Comparison

Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF (LEAD) has a higher volatility of 5.87% compared to Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND) at 0.00%. This indicates that LEAD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


LEADDFNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.87%

0.00%

+5.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.58%

8.52%

+3.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.53%

17.95%

+0.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.27%

22.58%

-5.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.60%

19.15%

-0.55%