PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LEAD vs. DSTL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LEAD vs. DSTL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF (LEAD) and Distillate U.S. Fundamental Stability & Value ETF (DSTL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LEAD achieves a 13.06% return, which is significantly higher than DSTL's 11.38% return.


LEAD

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.57%
6M
8.09%
YTD
13.06%
1Y
19.57%
3Y*
15.45%
5Y*
11.12%
10Y*
14.17%
ALL TIME*
14.29%

DSTL

1D
-0.37%
1M
5.06%
6M
9.47%
YTD
11.38%
1Y
21.28%
3Y*
13.05%
5Y*
10.39%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$4.23M$3.71M$4.59M

LEAD vs. DSTL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
LEAD
Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF
13.06%15.52%10.32%26.25%-18.16%29.69%23.41%33.75%-6.65%
DSTL
Distillate U.S. Fundamental Stability & Value ETF
11.38%8.71%12.78%22.71%-10.64%28.87%19.31%35.49%-8.42%

Correlation

The correlation between LEAD and DSTL is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2018

0.86

Over the past year, the correlation between LEAD and DSTL has dropped to 0.43 - well below their long-term average of 0.86, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

LEAD vs. DSTL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LEAD
DSTL

Technology

41.5%
28.6%

Industrials

33.3%
13.4%

Financial Services

15.8%
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
2.8%

Healthcare

2.1%
22.6%

Consumer Cyclical

1.8%
12.4%

Energy

1.5%
5.3%

Communication Services

0.1%
6.0%

Basic Materials

-

0.6%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

1.0%

Technology

LEAD
41.5%
DSTL
28.6%

Industrials

LEAD
33.3%
DSTL
13.4%

Financial Services

LEAD
15.8%
DSTL
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

LEAD
4.0%
DSTL
2.8%

Healthcare

LEAD
2.1%
DSTL
22.6%

Consumer Cyclical

LEAD
1.8%
DSTL
12.4%

Energy

LEAD
1.5%
DSTL
5.3%

Communication Services

LEAD
0.1%
DSTL
6.0%

Basic Materials

LEAD

-

DSTL
0.6%

Real Estate

LEAD

-

DSTL

-

Utilities

LEAD

-

DSTL
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LEAD vs. DSTL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LEAD

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


DSTL
DSTL Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
DSTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DSTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
DSTL Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
DSTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
DSTL Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LEAD vs. DSTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF (LEAD) and Distillate U.S. Fundamental Stability & Value ETF (DSTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LEADDSTLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.27

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

2.47

-0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.28

7.12

+1.16

LEAD vs. DSTL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LEAD Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is comparable to the DSTL Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LEAD and DSTL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LEAD vs. DSTL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LEAD drawdown since its inception was -32.19%, roughly equal to the maximum DSTL drawdown of -33.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEAD and DSTL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LEADDSTLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.19%

-33.09%

+0.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.65%

-8.30%

-0.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.86%

-16.92%

-0.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.93%

-20.10%

-4.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.25%

-2.50%

-3.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.41%

-4.11%

-0.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.37%

2.88%

-0.51%

Volatility

LEAD vs. DSTL - Volatility Comparison

Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF (LEAD) and Distillate U.S. Fundamental Stability & Value ETF (DSTL) have volatilities of 6.62% and 6.39%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LEADDSTLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.62%

6.39%

+0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.31%

10.59%

+2.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.27%

13.36%

+2.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.68%

16.00%

+1.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.75%

19.39%

-0.64%

LEAD vs. DSTL - Expense Ratio Comparison

LEAD has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than DSTL's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

LEAD vs. DSTL - Dividend Comparison

LEAD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DSTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DSTL
Distillate U.S. Fundamental Stability & Value ETF
1.13%1.31%1.34%1.30%1.35%1.01%0.83%0.97%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LEAD
Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF
0.58%0.70%0.93%1.13%1.27%1.79%0.81%1.32%1.38%0.97%1.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


LEAD and DSTL have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LEAD has higher volatility (6.62%) compared to DSTL (6.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LEAD dropped -32.19% vs DSTL's -33.09%.

On 5-year performance, LEAD leads with 11.12% vs 10.39% for DSTL. On fees, DSTL is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, DSTL has been the lower-risk option at 6.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, LEAD has performed better with a 11.12% return vs 10.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DSTL is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for LEAD.

DSTL has the higher dividend yield at 1.13%, compared with 0.58% for LEAD.

LEAD is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while DSTL is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: SRN Advisors and Distillate. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for LEAD and 0.39% for DSTL.

DSTL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LEAD and DSTL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer