LEAD vs. VIG
LEAD (Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF) and VIG (Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LEAD is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend Index, while VIG is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LEAD returned 14.17%/yr vs 12.98%/yr for VIG. Their correlation of 0.85 means they have usually moved in the same direction. LEAD charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VIG.
Performance
LEAD vs. VIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LEAD achieves a 13.06% return, which is significantly higher than VIG's 10.16% return. Over the past 10 years, LEAD has outperformed VIG with an annualized return of 14.17%, while VIG has yielded a comparatively lower 12.98% annualized return.
LEAD
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.57%
- 6M
- 7.13%
- YTD
- 13.06%
- 1Y
- 19.57%
- 3Y*
- 15.45%
- 5Y*
- 11.12%
- 10Y*
- 14.17%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.29%
VIG
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 0.64%
- 6M
- 7.02%
- YTD
- 10.16%
- 1Y
- 19.59%
- 3Y*
- 15.82%
- 5Y*
- 10.56%
- 10Y*
- 12.98%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.24%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $232.65M | $242.03M | $260.72M |
LEAD vs. VIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LEAD Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF | 13.06% | 15.52% | 10.32% | 26.25% | -18.16% | 29.69% | 23.41% | 33.75% | -6.63% | 24.89% |
VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | 10.16% | 14.17% | 16.99% | 14.51% | -9.80% | 23.76% | 15.43% | 29.62% | -2.08% | 22.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between LEAD and VIG is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 6, 2016 | 0.85 |
The correlation between LEAD and VIG shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.90 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
LEAD vs. VIG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LEAD
VIG
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Communication Services
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Technology
LEAD
VIG
Industrials
LEAD
VIG
Financial Services
LEAD
VIG
Consumer Defensive
LEAD
VIG
Healthcare
LEAD
VIG
Consumer Cyclical
LEAD
VIG
Energy
LEAD
VIG
Communication Services
LEAD
VIG
Basic Materials
LEAD
-
VIG
Real Estate
LEAD
-
VIG
-
Utilities
LEAD
-
VIG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LEAD vs. VIG — Risk / Return Rank
LEAD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VIG
LEAD vs. VIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF (LEAD) and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LEAD | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.35 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.27 | 2.49 | -0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.28 | 10.11 | -1.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LEAD vs. VIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LEAD drawdown since its inception was -32.19%, smaller than the maximum VIG drawdown of -46.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEAD and VIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LEAD | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.19% | -46.81% | +14.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.65% | -7.91% | -0.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.86% | -14.95% | -2.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.93% | -20.39% | -4.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.19% | -31.72% | -0.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.25% | -0.66% | -5.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.41% | -5.47% | +1.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.37% | 1.94% | +0.43% |
Volatility
LEAD vs. VIG - Volatility Comparison
Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF (LEAD) has a higher volatility of 6.62% compared to Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) at 2.57%. This indicates that LEAD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LEAD | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.62% | 2.57% | +4.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.31% | 7.62% | +5.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.27% | 10.08% | +6.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.68% | 14.20% | +3.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.75% | 16.02% | +2.73% |
LEAD vs. VIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
LEAD has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than VIG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
LEAD vs. VIG - Dividend Comparison
LEAD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LEAD Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF | 0.58% | 0.70% | 0.93% | 1.13% | 1.27% | 1.79% | 0.81% | 1.32% | 1.38% | 0.97% | 1.38% | 0.00% |
VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | 1.49% | 1.62% | 1.73% | 1.88% | 1.96% | 1.55% | 1.63% | 1.71% | 2.08% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 2.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LEAD and VIG have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LEAD has higher volatility (6.62%) compared to VIG (2.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LEAD dropped -32.19% vs VIG's -46.81%.
On 10-year performance, LEAD leads with 14.17% vs 12.98% for VIG. On fees, VIG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VIG has been the lower-risk option at 2.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, LEAD has performed better with a 14.17% return vs 12.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VIG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for LEAD.
VIG has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 0.58% for LEAD.
LEAD is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VIG is Dividend. LEAD tracks Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend Index, while VIG tracks S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index. They also come from different issuers: SRN Advisors and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for LEAD and 0.04% for VIG.
VIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LEAD and VIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer