LEAD vs. SPY
LEAD (Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LEAD is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend Index, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LEAD returned 14.71%/yr vs 15.49%/yr for SPY. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LEAD charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
LEAD vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LEAD achieves a 15.75% return, which is significantly higher than SPY's 10.91% return. Over the past 10 years, LEAD has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 14.71%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 15.49% annualized return.
LEAD
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 4.84%
- YTD
- 15.75%
- 6M
- 14.25%
- 1Y
- 25.56%
- 3Y*
- 19.23%
- 5Y*
- 12.16%
- 10Y*
- 14.71%
SPY
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 5.05%
- YTD
- 10.91%
- 6M
- 10.91%
- 1Y
- 27.98%
- 3Y*
- 22.35%
- 5Y*
- 13.83%
- 10Y*
- 15.49%
LEAD vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LEAD Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF | 15.75% | 15.52% | 10.32% | 26.25% | -18.16% | 29.69% | 23.41% | 33.75% | -6.63% | 24.89% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 10.91% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 18.33% | 31.22% | -4.57% | 21.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between LEAD and SPY is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2016 | 0.86 |
The correlation between LEAD and SPY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
LEAD vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LEAD
SPY
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Communication Services
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
LEAD
SPY
Industrials
LEAD
SPY
Financial Services
LEAD
SPY
Healthcare
LEAD
SPY
Consumer Defensive
LEAD
SPY
Consumer Cyclical
LEAD
SPY
Energy
LEAD
SPY
Communication Services
LEAD
SPY
Basic Materials
LEAD
-
SPY
Real Estate
LEAD
-
SPY
Utilities
LEAD
-
SPY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LEAD vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
LEAD
SPY
LEAD vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF (LEAD) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LEAD | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.77 | 2.38 | -0.61 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.47 | 3.24 | -0.77 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.43 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.97 | 3.16 | -0.19 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.66 | 14.72 | -2.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LEAD | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.77 | 2.38 | -0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 0.82 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 | 0.87 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | 0.59 | +0.22 |
Drawdowns
LEAD vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LEAD drawdown since its inception was -32.19%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEAD and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LEAD | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.19% | -55.19% | +23.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.65% | -8.88% | +0.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.86% | -18.76% | +0.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.93% | -24.50% | -0.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.19% | -33.72% | +1.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.70% | +0.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.42% | -9.05% | +4.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.02% | 1.91% | +0.11% |
Volatility
LEAD vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF (LEAD) has a higher volatility of 4.12% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 2.84%. This indicates that LEAD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LEAD | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.12% | 2.84% | +1.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.33% | 8.90% | +2.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.56% | 11.83% | +2.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.34% | 17.05% | +0.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.65% | 17.94% | +0.71% |
LEAD vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
LEAD has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
LEAD vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
LEAD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, less than SPY's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LEAD Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF | 0.58% | 0.70% | 0.93% | 1.13% | 1.27% | 1.79% | 0.81% | 1.32% | 1.38% | 0.97% | 1.38% | 0.00% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 0.98% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LEAD and SPY have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LEAD has higher volatility (4.12%) compared to SPY (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LEAD dropped -32.19% vs SPY's -55.19%.
On 10-year performance, SPY leads with 15.49% vs 14.71% for LEAD. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPY has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPY has performed better with a 15.49% return vs 14.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for LEAD.
SPY has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.58% for LEAD.
LEAD is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. LEAD tracks Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend Index, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: SRN Advisors and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for LEAD and 0.09% for SPY.
SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LEAD and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer