LCUT vs. CAMT
LCUT (Lifetime Brands, Inc.) and CAMT (Camtek Ltd) are both stocks. LCUT operates in Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances (Consumer Cyclical), while CAMT operates in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials (Technology). Over the past 10 years, LCUT returned -3.48%/yr vs 51.90%/yr for CAMT. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LCUT vs. CAMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LCUT achieves a 126.52% return, which is significantly higher than CAMT's 39.09% return. Over the past 10 years, LCUT has underperformed CAMT with an annualized return of -3.48%, while CAMT has yielded a comparatively higher 51.90% annualized return.
LCUT
- 1D
- 5.78%
- 1M
- 5.28%
- 6M
- 120.93%
- YTD
- 126.52%
- 1Y
- 105.60%
- 3Y*
- 20.02%
- 5Y*
- -6.69%
- 10Y*
- -3.48%
CAMT
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -18.83%
- 6M
- 2.45%
- YTD
- 39.09%
- 1Y
- 62.53%
- 3Y*
- 51.50%
- 5Y*
- 35.12%
- 10Y*
- 51.90%
LCUT vs. CAMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCUT Lifetime Brands, Inc. | 126.52% | -30.37% | -9.95% | -8.95% | -51.76% | 6.23% | 123.08% | -29.39% | -38.37% | -6.17% |
CAMT Camtek Ltd | 39.09% | 31.66% | 18.33% | 215.94% | -52.30% | 110.13% | 102.31% | 63.19% | 20.41% | 77.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between LCUT and CAMT is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2000 | 0.13 |
The correlation between LCUT and CAMT shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.16 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LCUT:
$200.67M
CAMT:
$6.90B
LCUT:
-$1.90
CAMT:
$0.98
LCUT:
0.19
CAMT:
14.54
LCUT:
$651.36M
CAMT:
$499.09M
LCUT:
$244.23M
CAMT:
$250.68M
LCUT:
$3.18M
CAMT:
$122.77M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LCUT vs. CAMT — Risk / Return Rank
LCUT
CAMT
LCUT vs. CAMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lifetime Brands, Inc. (LCUT) and Camtek Ltd (CAMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LCUT | CAMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.19 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.84 | 1.76 | +1.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.43 | 4.73 | +0.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LCUT vs. CAMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCUT drawdown since its inception was -96.52%, roughly equal to the maximum CAMT drawdown of -97.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCUT and CAMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCUT | CAMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.52% | -97.71% | +1.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.43% | -35.77% | -1.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -73.35% | -63.16% | -10.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -83.39% | -63.16% | -20.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -83.39% | -63.16% | -20.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -60.26% | -28.70% | -31.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.77% | -55.60% | +11.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.51% | 13.26% | +6.25% |
Volatility
LCUT vs. CAMT - Volatility Comparison
Lifetime Brands, Inc. (LCUT) and Camtek Ltd (CAMT) have volatilities of 26.54% and 27.39%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LCUT | CAMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 26.54% | 27.39% | -0.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 72.43% | 54.64% | +17.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 85.33% | 67.55% | +17.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 64.25% | 56.89% | +7.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 59.95% | 52.53% | +7.42% |
Dividends
LCUT vs. CAMT - Dividend Comparison
LCUT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, while CAMT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAMT Camtek Ltd | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.57% | 2.07% | 2.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LCUT Lifetime Brands, Inc. | 1.94% | 4.30% | 2.88% | 2.53% | 2.24% | 1.06% | 1.12% | 2.45% | 1.69% | 1.03% | 0.96% | 1.17% |
Financials
LCUT vs. CAMT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lifetime Brands, Inc. and Camtek Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LCUT vs. CAMT - Profitability Comparison
LCUT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Lifetime Brands, Inc. reported a gross profit of 54.17M and revenue of 143.51M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.8%.
CAMT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Camtek Ltd reported a gross profit of 60.93M and revenue of 121.66M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.1%.
LCUT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Lifetime Brands, Inc. reported an operating income of -2.23M and revenue of 143.51M, resulting in an operating margin of -1.6%.
CAMT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Camtek Ltd reported an operating income of 27.27M and revenue of 121.66M, resulting in an operating margin of 22.4%.
LCUT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Lifetime Brands, Inc. reported a net income of -4.77M and revenue of 143.51M, resulting in a net margin of -3.3%.
CAMT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Camtek Ltd reported a net income of 31.65M and revenue of 121.66M, resulting in a net margin of 26.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LCUT and CAMT have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CAMT has higher volatility (27.39%) compared to LCUT (26.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCUT dropped -96.52% vs CAMT's -97.71%.
LCUT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LCUT and CAMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer