LCUT vs. NVO
LCUT (Lifetime Brands, Inc.) and NVO (Novo Nordisk A/S) are both stocks. LCUT operates in Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances (Consumer Cyclical), while NVO operates in Drug Manufacturers - General (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, LCUT returned -2.96%/yr vs 6.56%/yr for NVO. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LCUT vs. NVO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LCUT achieves a 141.74% return, which is significantly higher than NVO's -11.01% return. Over the past 10 years, LCUT has underperformed NVO with an annualized return of -2.96%, while NVO has yielded a comparatively higher 6.56% annualized return.
LCUT
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 45.27%
- YTD
- 141.74%
- 6M
- 123.62%
- 1Y
- 187.17%
- 3Y*
- 27.45%
- 5Y*
- -8.45%
- 10Y*
- -2.96%
NVO
- 1D
- 4.17%
- 1M
- -2.50%
- YTD
- -11.01%
- 6M
- -5.65%
- 1Y
- -36.44%
- 3Y*
- -15.71%
- 5Y*
- 3.74%
- 10Y*
- 6.56%
LCUT vs. NVO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCUT Lifetime Brands, Inc. | 141.74% | -30.37% | -9.95% | -8.95% | -51.76% | 6.23% | 123.08% | -29.39% | -38.37% | -6.17% |
NVO Novo Nordisk A/S | -11.01% | -39.22% | -15.93% | 54.84% | 22.66% | 63.52% | 23.33% | 28.70% | -12.98% | 52.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between LCUT and NVO is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 1991 | 0.10 |
Fundamentals
LCUT:
-$1.69
NVO:
$27.42
LCUT:
0.23
NVO:
0.59
LCUT:
$651.36M
NVO:
$327.80B
LCUT:
$244.23M
NVO:
$268.30B
LCUT:
$3.18M
NVO:
$181.54B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LCUT vs. NVO — Risk / Return Rank
LCUT
NVO
LCUT vs. NVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lifetime Brands, Inc. (LCUT) and Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LCUT | NVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 0.89 | +0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.29 | -0.66 | +4.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.42 | -0.99 | +8.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LCUT | NVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.16 | -0.70 | +2.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.13 | 0.10 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.05 | 0.20 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.04 | 0.47 | -0.43 |
Drawdowns
LCUT vs. NVO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCUT drawdown since its inception was -96.52%, which is greater than NVO's maximum drawdown of -74.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCUT and NVO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCUT | NVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.52% | -74.70% | -21.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.88% | -55.03% | +11.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -73.35% | -74.70% | +1.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -83.39% | -74.70% | -8.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -83.39% | -74.70% | -8.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -57.59% | -68.21% | +10.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.71% | -17.76% | -25.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.33% | 36.98% | -11.65% |
Volatility
LCUT vs. NVO - Volatility Comparison
Lifetime Brands, Inc. (LCUT) has a higher volatility of 43.13% compared to Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO) at 8.89%. This indicates that LCUT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LCUT | NVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 43.13% | 8.89% | +34.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 68.74% | 38.00% | +30.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 87.30% | 51.88% | +35.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.24% | 38.25% | +24.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 59.47% | 32.51% | +26.96% |
Dividends
LCUT vs. NVO - Dividend Comparison
LCUT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, less than NVO's 4.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCUT Lifetime Brands, Inc. | 1.81% | 4.30% | 2.88% | 2.53% | 2.24% | 1.06% | 1.12% | 2.45% | 1.69% | 1.03% | 0.96% | 1.17% |
NVO Novo Nordisk A/S | 4.12% | 3.31% | 1.68% | 1.00% | 1.20% | 1.35% | 1.87% | 2.14% | 1.45% | 1.52% | 2.87% | 0.92% |
Financials
LCUT vs. NVO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lifetime Brands, Inc. and Novo Nordisk A/S. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LCUT vs. NVO - Profitability Comparison
LCUT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lifetime Brands, Inc. reported a gross profit of 54.17M and revenue of 143.51M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.8%.
NVO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Novo Nordisk A/S reported a gross profit of 83.23B and revenue of 96.82B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.0%.
LCUT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lifetime Brands, Inc. reported an operating income of -2.23M and revenue of 143.51M, resulting in an operating margin of -1.6%.
NVO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Novo Nordisk A/S reported an operating income of 59.62B and revenue of 96.82B, resulting in an operating margin of 61.6%.
LCUT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lifetime Brands, Inc. reported a net income of -4.77M and revenue of 143.51M, resulting in a net margin of -3.3%.
NVO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Novo Nordisk A/S reported a net income of 48.56B and revenue of 96.82B, resulting in a net margin of 50.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LCUT and NVO have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LCUT has higher volatility (43.13%) compared to NVO (8.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCUT dropped -96.52% vs NVO's -74.70%.
LCUT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LCUT and NVO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer