LCUT vs. AVGO
LCUT (Lifetime Brands, Inc.) and AVGO (Broadcom Inc.) are both stocks. LCUT operates in Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances (Consumer Cyclical), while AVGO operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past 10 years, LCUT returned -2.96%/yr vs 41.92%/yr for AVGO. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LCUT vs. AVGO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LCUT achieves a 141.74% return, which is significantly higher than AVGO's 21.29% return. Over the past 10 years, LCUT has underperformed AVGO with an annualized return of -2.96%, while AVGO has yielded a comparatively higher 41.92% annualized return.
LCUT
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 45.27%
- YTD
- 141.74%
- 6M
- 123.62%
- 1Y
- 187.17%
- 3Y*
- 27.45%
- 5Y*
- -8.45%
- 10Y*
- -2.96%
AVGO
- 1D
- -12.59%
- 1M
- -1.98%
- YTD
- 21.29%
- 6M
- 10.38%
- 1Y
- 61.75%
- 3Y*
- 75.80%
- 5Y*
- 57.68%
- 10Y*
- 41.92%
LCUT vs. AVGO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCUT Lifetime Brands, Inc. | 141.74% | -30.37% | -9.95% | -8.95% | -51.76% | 6.23% | 123.08% | -29.39% | -38.37% | -6.17% |
AVGO Broadcom Inc. | 21.29% | 50.63% | 110.49% | 104.18% | -13.27% | 56.48% | 44.88% | 29.05% | 2.18% | 48.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between LCUT and AVGO is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2009 | 0.22 |
The correlation between LCUT and AVGO shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (1 year) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LCUT:
-$1.69
AVGO:
$6.01
LCUT:
0.23
AVGO:
27.08
LCUT:
$651.36M
AVGO:
$75.47B
LCUT:
$244.23M
AVGO:
$50.53B
LCUT:
$3.18M
AVGO:
$41.76B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LCUT vs. AVGO — Risk / Return Rank
LCUT
AVGO
LCUT vs. AVGO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lifetime Brands, Inc. (LCUT) and Broadcom Inc. (AVGO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LCUT | AVGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.26 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.29 | 2.17 | +2.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.42 | 5.19 | +2.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LCUT | AVGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.16 | 1.39 | +0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.13 | 1.34 | -1.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.05 | 1.07 | -1.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.04 | 1.10 | -1.06 |
Drawdowns
LCUT vs. AVGO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCUT drawdown since its inception was -96.52%, which is greater than AVGO's maximum drawdown of -48.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCUT and AVGO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCUT | AVGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.52% | -48.30% | -48.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.88% | -28.67% | -15.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -73.35% | -41.15% | -32.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -83.39% | -41.15% | -42.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -83.39% | -48.30% | -35.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -57.59% | -13.01% | -44.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.71% | -7.97% | -35.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.33% | 11.94% | +13.39% |
Volatility
LCUT vs. AVGO - Volatility Comparison
Lifetime Brands, Inc. (LCUT) has a higher volatility of 43.13% compared to Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) at 18.29%. This indicates that LCUT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVGO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LCUT | AVGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 43.13% | 18.29% | +24.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 68.74% | 33.56% | +35.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 87.30% | 44.74% | +42.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.24% | 43.15% | +20.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 59.47% | 39.38% | +20.09% |
Dividends
LCUT vs. AVGO - Dividend Comparison
LCUT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, more than AVGO's 0.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVGO Broadcom Inc. | 0.59% | 0.70% | 0.94% | 1.71% | 3.02% | 2.24% | 3.05% | 3.54% | 3.11% | 1.87% | 1.43% | 1.13% |
LCUT Lifetime Brands, Inc. | 1.81% | 4.30% | 2.88% | 2.53% | 2.24% | 1.06% | 1.12% | 2.45% | 1.69% | 1.03% | 0.96% | 1.17% |
Financials
LCUT vs. AVGO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lifetime Brands, Inc. and Broadcom Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LCUT vs. AVGO - Profitability Comparison
LCUT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lifetime Brands, Inc. reported a gross profit of 54.17M and revenue of 143.51M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.8%.
AVGO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Broadcom Inc. reported a gross profit of 14.92B and revenue of 22.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.2%.
LCUT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lifetime Brands, Inc. reported an operating income of -2.23M and revenue of 143.51M, resulting in an operating margin of -1.6%.
AVGO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Broadcom Inc. reported an operating income of 10.87B and revenue of 22.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 49.0%.
LCUT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lifetime Brands, Inc. reported a net income of -4.77M and revenue of 143.51M, resulting in a net margin of -3.3%.
AVGO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Broadcom Inc. reported a net income of 9.31B and revenue of 22.19B, resulting in a net margin of 42.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LCUT and AVGO have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LCUT has higher volatility (43.13%) compared to AVGO (18.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCUT dropped -96.52% vs AVGO's -48.30%.
LCUT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LCUT and AVGO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer