PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LCUT vs. ULBI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LCUT vs. ULBI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lifetime Brands, Inc. (LCUT) and Ultralife Corporation (ULBI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCUT achieves a 126.52% return, which is significantly higher than ULBI's -2.97% return. Over the past 10 years, LCUT has underperformed ULBI with an annualized return of -3.48%, while ULBI has yielded a comparatively higher 1.74% annualized return.


LCUT

1D
5.78%
1M
5.28%
6M
120.93%
YTD
126.52%
1Y
105.60%
3Y*
20.02%
5Y*
-6.69%
10Y*
-3.48%

ULBI

1D
-3.48%
1M
-13.42%
6M
-21.16%
YTD
-2.97%
1Y
-35.47%
3Y*
3.61%
5Y*
-7.53%
10Y*
1.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCUT vs. ULBI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LCUT
Lifetime Brands, Inc.
126.52%-30.37%-9.95%-8.95%-51.76%6.23%123.08%-29.39%-38.37%-6.17%
ULBI
Ultralife Corporation
-2.97%-23.22%9.24%76.68%-36.09%-6.65%-12.45%9.48%3.05%32.32%

Correlation

The correlation between LCUT and ULBI is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 1992

0.10

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LCUT:

$200.67M

ULBI:

$92.44M

EPS

LCUT:

-$1.90

ULBI:

-$0.49

PS Ratio

LCUT:

0.19

ULBI:

0.49

Total Revenue (TTM)

LCUT:

$651.36M

ULBI:

$187.86M

Gross Profit (TTM)

LCUT:

$244.23M

ULBI:

$43.39M

EBITDA (TTM)

LCUT:

$3.18M

ULBI:

$6.73M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LCUT vs. ULBI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCUT
LCUT Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
LCUT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCUT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCUT Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
LCUT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCUT Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

ULBI
ULBI Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
ULBI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ULBI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
ULBI Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
ULBI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
ULBI Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCUT vs. ULBI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lifetime Brands, Inc. (LCUT) and Ultralife Corporation (ULBI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LCUTULBIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

0.92

+0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.84

-0.80

+3.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.43

-1.21

+6.64

LCUT vs. ULBI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCUT Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is higher than the ULBI Sharpe Ratio of -0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCUT and ULBI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LCUT vs. ULBI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCUT drawdown since its inception was -96.52%, roughly equal to the maximum ULBI drawdown of -92.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCUT and ULBI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LCUTULBIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.52%

-92.90%

-3.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.43%

-44.69%

+7.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-73.35%

-68.83%

-4.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-83.39%

-68.83%

-14.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-83.39%

-68.83%

-14.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-60.26%

-77.35%

+17.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.77%

-63.51%

+19.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.51%

29.35%

-9.84%

Volatility

LCUT vs. ULBI - Volatility Comparison

Lifetime Brands, Inc. (LCUT) has a higher volatility of 26.54% compared to Ultralife Corporation (ULBI) at 9.77%. This indicates that LCUT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ULBI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LCUTULBIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

26.54%

9.77%

+16.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

72.43%

40.49%

+31.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

85.33%

56.33%

+29.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

64.25%

59.06%

+5.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

59.95%

54.34%

+5.61%

Dividends

LCUT vs. ULBI - Dividend Comparison

LCUT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, while ULBI has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LCUT
Lifetime Brands, Inc.
1.94%4.30%2.88%2.53%2.24%1.06%1.12%2.45%1.69%1.03%0.96%1.17%
ULBI
Ultralife Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

LCUT vs. ULBI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lifetime Brands, Inc. and Ultralife Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


50.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
143.51M
47.45M
(LCUT) Total Revenue
(ULBI) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LCUT vs. ULBI - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lifetime Brands, Inc. and Ultralife Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
37.8%
21.3%
Portfolio components
LCUT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Lifetime Brands, Inc. reported a gross profit of 54.17M and revenue of 143.51M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.8%.

ULBI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Ultralife Corporation reported a gross profit of 10.11M and revenue of 47.45M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.3%.

LCUT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Lifetime Brands, Inc. reported an operating income of -2.23M and revenue of 143.51M, resulting in an operating margin of -1.6%.

ULBI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Ultralife Corporation reported an operating income of -215.00K and revenue of 47.45M, resulting in an operating margin of -0.5%.

LCUT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Lifetime Brands, Inc. reported a net income of -4.77M and revenue of 143.51M, resulting in a net margin of -3.3%.

ULBI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Ultralife Corporation reported a net income of -451.00K and revenue of 47.45M, resulting in a net margin of -1.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LCUT and ULBI have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LCUT has higher volatility (26.54%) compared to ULBI (9.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCUT dropped -96.52% vs ULBI's -92.90%.

LCUT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LCUT and ULBI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer