LCUT vs. TXN

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

LCUT (Lifetime Brands, Inc.) and TXN (Texas Instruments Incorporated) are both stocks. LCUT operates in Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances (Consumer Cyclical), while TXN operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past 10 years, LCUT returned -2.96%/yr vs 20.68%/yr for TXN. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

LCUT vs. TXN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lifetime Brands, Inc. (LCUT) and Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCUT achieves a 141.74% return, which is significantly higher than TXN's 78.06% return. Over the past 10 years, LCUT has underperformed TXN with an annualized return of -2.96%, while TXN has yielded a comparatively higher 20.68% annualized return.

LCUT

• 1D: 0.43%
• 1M: 45.27%
• YTD: 141.74%
• 6M: 123.62%
• 1Y: 187.17%
• 3Y*: 27.45%
• 5Y*: -8.45%
• 10Y*: -2.96%

TXN

• 1D: -1.04%
• 1M: 8.67%
• YTD: 78.06%
• 6M: 71.51%
• 1Y: 64.61%
• 3Y*: 25.10%
• 5Y*: 13.12%
• 10Y*: 20.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCUT vs. TXN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LCUT Lifetime Brands, Inc.	141.74%	-30.37%	-9.95%	-8.95%	-51.76%	6.23%	123.08%	-29.39%	-38.37%	-6.17%
TXN Texas Instruments Incorporated	78.06%	-4.47%	13.14%	6.41%	-9.86%	17.53%	31.70%	39.56%	-7.17%	46.75%

Correlation

The correlation between LCUT and TXN is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.07
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.14
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.19
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 1991	0.16

The correlation between LCUT and TXN shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.21 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS LCUT : -$1.69 TXN : $5.88
PS Ratio LCUT : 0.23 TXN : 15.13
Total Revenue (TTM) LCUT : $651.36M TXN : $18.44B
Gross Profit (TTM) LCUT : $244.23M TXN : $10.57B
EBITDA (TTM) LCUT : $3.18M TXN : $8.21B

Return for Risk

LCUT vs. TXN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCUT

LCUT Risk / Return Rank: 87
LCUT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
LCUT Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
LCUT Omega Ratio Rank: 84
LCUT Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
LCUT Martin Ratio Rank: 82

TXN

TXN Risk / Return Rank: 80
TXN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
TXN Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
TXN Omega Ratio Rank: 84
TXN Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
TXN Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCUT vs. TXN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lifetime Brands, Inc. (LCUT) and Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LCUT	TXN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.16	1.65	+0.51
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.01	2.52	+0.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.35	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.29	2.20	+2.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.42	4.60	+2.82
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LCUT vs. TXN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCUT Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is higher than the TXN Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCUT and TXN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LCUT	TXN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.16	1.65	+0.51
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.13	0.41	-0.54
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.05	0.67	-0.72
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.04	0.30	-0.26

Drawdowns

LCUT vs. TXN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCUT drawdown since its inception was -96.52%, which is greater than TXN's maximum drawdown of -85.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCUT and TXN.

Drawdown Indicators

	LCUT	TXN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.52%	-85.81%	-10.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-43.88%	-29.57%	-14.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-73.35%	-33.41%	-39.94%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-83.39%	-33.41%	-49.98%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-83.39%	-33.41%	-49.98%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-57.59%	-6.01%	-51.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-43.71%	-34.79%	-8.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	25.33%	14.07%	+11.26%

Volatility

LCUT vs. TXN - Volatility Comparison

Lifetime Brands, Inc. (LCUT) has a higher volatility of 43.13% compared to Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) at 12.17%. This indicates that LCUT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TXN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LCUT	TXN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	43.13%	12.17%	+30.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	68.74%	30.34%	+38.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	87.30%	39.27%	+48.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	63.24%	32.18%	+31.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	59.47%	31.04%	+28.43%

Dividends

LCUT vs. TXN - Dividend Comparison

LCUT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, less than TXN's 1.84% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LCUT Lifetime Brands, Inc.	1.81%	4.30%	2.88%	2.53%	2.24%	1.06%	1.12%	2.45%	1.69%	1.03%	0.96%	1.17%
TXN Texas Instruments Incorporated	1.84%	3.17%	2.81%	2.94%	2.84%	2.23%	2.27%	2.50%	2.78%	2.03%	2.25%	2.55%

Financials

LCUT vs. TXN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lifetime Brands, Inc. and Texas Instruments Incorporated over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

LCUT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lifetime Brands, Inc. reported a gross profit of 54.17M and revenue of 143.51M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.8%.

TXN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Texas Instruments Incorporated reported a gross profit of 2.80B and revenue of 4.83B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.0%.

LCUT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lifetime Brands, Inc. reported an operating income of -2.23M and revenue of 143.51M, resulting in an operating margin of -1.6%.

TXN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Texas Instruments Incorporated reported an operating income of 1.81B and revenue of 4.83B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.5%.

LCUT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lifetime Brands, Inc. reported a net income of -4.77M and revenue of 143.51M, resulting in a net margin of -3.3%.

TXN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Texas Instruments Incorporated reported a net income of 1.55B and revenue of 4.83B, resulting in a net margin of 32.0%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LCUT and TXN in my portfolio?

LCUT and TXN have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LCUT or TXN?

LCUT has higher volatility (43.13%) compared to TXN (12.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCUT dropped -96.52% vs TXN's -85.81%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LCUT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.